how many kids did she have?I read somewhere she went missing? Why? Are the kids with her?
- Notice
carriebooboo
VIP Member
Did TH have a job when all this was happening? I can't find it mentioned in any of the recaps.
CariettaWhite
Active member
Do they?? I wasn’t sure… well I do hope so!
Ah tha k you for such
It looks like this trial will go the way you suggested, with only intermittent updates and not proper, in court, live updates. There's no image of the perpetrators. It's unusual I thought.
I looked at the court listings on Monday and said their names in the afternoon. So interesting it's back off the Court listings.
Ah thank you, very informative and helpful reply! Really appreciate it. Its just when I found this story and saw it would be on same website as Arthur's I figured I'd start reading into it in the hope I'd see justice done.As someone who follows a lot of murder trials (currently 24 with another due to start today) I would say reporting is very patchy at the moment.
I've got a few ongoing trials on my list, that I know are sitting every day, as I can see them on the court listings, yet there has been nothing reported. I was following a case that suddenly stopped and I have no idea why. It was reported on initially and then nothing, although that could be for legal reasons. Some you get great reporting every day live from court. Some you only get live reporting on day one (outlining the csse) and then intermittently when something interesting happens - for example a defendant giving evidence. Some you don't get to hear about until sentencing. Some not at all, although that is rare. But there's a case local to me (East London) with an Asian victim stabbed to death. Several defendants involved. I know it sat for weeks at The Old Bailey, I know they have all been sentenced, because I saw it on the court listings, yet absolutely nothing, not even in the local paper and yet it was a big splash at the time of the killing.
It is extremely frustrating to say the least.
Birmingham Live is usually pretty decent for updates, although I have a case on my list at the moment in the area, where there was live reporting on the first day then nothing (woman killed by her partner) I strongly suspect the live reporting is determined by clicks so, if they're getting a lot of traffic to the site, they'll continue reporting every day on the case. If not, they'll stop. The more appalling or salacious the case is, the more coverage it will get sadly. Without wishing to be accused of "race baiting", I think it's pretty much accepted that victims from ethnic minorities sometimes get less coverage. I also think it could be down to staff shortages with Covid - they can't afford to let someone sit in court every day as they need them in the office covering someone who is not there.
In the case you have mentioned, I quickly checked the court listings and can't see that it is sitting today
My best advice would be to keep checking the court listings and do a Google search every day of the victim's name. I trawl through my list around 5pm and then again before bed usually. I got a hit on a new trial that started yesterday last night just before I was about to go to sleep, which then led to a Facebook trawl for another half an hour with a plan to return to that today! It is like a full time job sometimes
It looks like this trial will go the way you suggested, with only intermittent updates and not proper, in court, live updates. There's no image of the perpetrators. It's unusual I thought.
I looked at the court listings on Monday and said their names in the afternoon. So interesting it's back off the Court listings.
CerianDevroe
Active member
They only cut the TVs/Channels where that specific person was located and it was considered a high profile, provocative case such as this one. There’d be little need to cut the TVs in New Hall if the person was placed in Eastwood Park. There are considerably less prisons for females so it’s more noticeable when the TVs go down.
BettyBeau
VIP Member
I mean a show house no sign of a child living there
nichew
VIP Member
https://www.thetelegraphandargus.co...duckworth-lane-stabbing-murder-trial---day-2/ are you following this one? started yesterdayAs someone who follows a lot of murder trials (currently 24 with another due to start today) I would say reporting is very patchy at the moment.
I've got a few ongoing trials on my list, that I know are sitting every day, as I can see them on the court listings, yet there has been nothing reported. I was following a case that suddenly stopped and I have no idea why. It was reported on initially and then nothing, although that could be for legal reasons. Some you get great reporting every day live from court. Some you only get live reporting on day one (outlining the csse) and then intermittently when something interesting happens - for example a defendant giving evidence. Some you don't get to hear about until sentencing. Some not at all, although that is rare. But there's a case local to me (East London) with an Asian victim stabbed to death. Several defendants involved. I know it sat for weeks at The Old Bailey, I know they have all been sentenced, because I saw it on the court listings, yet absolutely nothing, not even in the local paper and yet it was a big splash at the time of the killing.
It is extremely frustrating to say the least.
Birmingham Live is usually pretty decent for updates, although I have a case on my list at the moment in the area, where there was live reporting on the first day then nothing (woman killed by her partner) I strongly suspect the live reporting is determined by clicks so, if they're getting a lot of traffic to the site, they'll continue reporting every day on the case. If not, they'll stop. The more appalling or salacious the case is, the more coverage it will get sadly. Without wishing to be accused of "race baiting", I think it's pretty much accepted that victims from ethnic minorities sometimes get less coverage. I also think it could be down to staff shortages with Covid - they can't afford to let someone sit in court every day as they need them in the office covering someone who is not there.
In the case you have mentioned, I quickly checked the court listings and can't see that it is sitting today
My best advice would be to keep checking the court listings and do a Google search every day of the victim's name. I trawl through my list around 5pm and then again before bed usually. I got a hit on a new trial that started yesterday last night just before I was about to go to sleep, which then led to a Facebook trawl for another half an hour with a plan to return to that today! It is like a full time job sometimes
yeah i also wondered where labinjo came from, i presumed her dads side but the sun had a interview with him who went by the name halcrow. strange...
heatmagazine
Chatty Member
I think she would of have parental responsibility taken away when she was sent to prison.
how many kids did she have?I read somewhere she went missing? Why? Are the kids with her? Z
do you know why she went missing before? Was her kids taken away from her?
SmudgeTheCat
Chatty Member
It is but how I wish it was true
Just wondering if I've got this part right. I'm not in any way slating. Just curious.
Arthur's maternal grandmother. I so feel for her. She is obviously distraught as is her daughter. And I do not blame OH at all. I can't imagine the pain she and Madeline (?) are going through.
She mentioned on a clip I saw of her on the good morning show(I haven't watched it all) that the Hughes family raised their concerns with her, came over, when they left it was 9.30pm and I'm sure she said too late to do anything...that's what the hughes family claim in their recent fb statement, that at least they didn't think it was too Late to do anything. That's what I'm taking from it anyway.
Did anyone else hear or think this? I'm not at all trying to badmouth a grieving grandmother. Just curious.i could've picked it all up wrong.
Arthur's maternal grandmother. I so feel for her. She is obviously distraught as is her daughter. And I do not blame OH at all. I can't imagine the pain she and Madeline (?) are going through.
She mentioned on a clip I saw of her on the good morning show(I haven't watched it all) that the Hughes family raised their concerns with her, came over, when they left it was 9.30pm and I'm sure she said too late to do anything...that's what the hughes family claim in their recent fb statement, that at least they didn't think it was too Late to do anything. That's what I'm taking from it anyway.
Did anyone else hear or think this? I'm not at all trying to badmouth a grieving grandmother. Just curious.i could've picked it all up wrong.
tinkertailorsoldierspy
Chatty Member
You're not alone in feeling the way you're feeling. I can't even think about it without feeling these pangs of despair. Poor, poor little boy.
whathastheworldcometo
VIP Member
I thought that was the year before
heatmagazine
Chatty Member
Yes she will. Unsure even quite doubtful if Hughes will be able to tho, hopefully he doesn’t want to go.
Urbanbunny
VIP Member
i wondered that too
whathastheworldcometo
VIP Member
It didn't seem like the child was harmed, so SS would not have done anything.
She said on TV how happy the child was.
I don't know whether the mother saw him in prison. I thought they first said that the mother joined the army?
If the grandparents have no rights, as another user advised, then she would have been guilty of harassment if she would have done all these things and the free legal advice would most likely have told her that she could only alert SS and the police to report her concerns - which she did.
The parties that had the power here were: SS and the police.