She's also said that both her and Tony claim 100% of phone, device and usage and internet as a business expense. When surely 95% of her internet use is for her own greed and narcissism.Exactly. There is plenty of evidence to suggest she does as much as possible to avoid paying tax without having to actually see her accounts.
Forgot about that. Hmrc should really look into them. I also think the office and the storage unit were ways to avoid tax too, since she has plenty of space in her house. She didn't even use the office.She's also said that both her and Tony claim 100% of phone, device and usage and internet as a business expense. When surely 95% of her internet use is for her own greed and narcissism.
I think she charged £4.99 for this new book didn't she? I thought I saw that it was a special offer on her birthday or somethingI think the big money she has recently spent on her business is an actual book (professional printing service), we all know she struggles with writing 1500 words so I think it will be ghost written (another cost). But I think that's what she's been hinting at. The pamphlets are a way to find out numbers who would be interested and get their details for the hard sell later on...
Yes I remember now, something like that. Who’s idiot enough to pay for anything from Emma?! Just look at the shit show of her life and you soon realise there is nothing of anything value or worth she can teach you.I think she charged £4.99 for this new book didn't she? I thought I saw that it was a special offer on her birthday or something
Thank m sure she’d find some way to slimy wriggle out of it.Can we report her to ICO for not being registered? Not only is she not registered but she’s passing peoples info onto a third party to make and ship these products. That’s a huge breach
She always has an excuse or a back up - all still bullshit though.Thank m sure she’d find some way to slimy wriggle out of it.
Most of type 2 diabetes is self inflicted tbh and Emma takes the absolute piss about it, there's no way she's still in remission I'm sure after her hot chocolate and cherry lips diet.I felt guilty when my husband and I were invited for the vaccine too (we're under 40 and he's healthy - just got a text from our GP surgery inviting us to go over the next morning!). But at the end of the day, the less people we have needing hospital treatment as a result of Covid, the better positioned our NHS is to treat others.
Also, I don't agree that type 2 diabetes is self-inflicted - if it were that simple, all obese people would be diabetic and there would be no thin diabetics. If you are diabetic though, it is important that you look after yourself - which Emma does not do as evidences by her endless hot chocolates and junk food.
please I can not prone Emma, I just can’t DONT make meMy reason for being annoyed about the vaccine are as follows:
- They have almost certainly been offered it due to health reasons of their own making (i.e obesity related).
- Emma was fortunate enough to be able to afford a weight loss tool which could have enabled her to significantly improve her health, but she thew it away.
- They spent nearly all last year making unnecessary shopping trips to B&M etc. This will likely continue this year and they will have zero regard for anyone who has not yet been offered a vaccine.
- They are tax avoiders. Tax funds the NHS.
- They aren't on the front line as key workers. They sit at home all day posting shit on the internet and painting figurines. How would we feel if say a 65 year old supermarket worker who they have jumped ahead of in the queue contracts Covid and dies?
I do however 100% appreciate that it is far cheaper to vaccinate the pair of them then have their mounds of flesh taking up an ICU bed.
Agree totally. My husband doesn’t use social media and the only app that I use a lot is IG, and that’s purely for nursing memes and teaching tools. I rarely share anything on there; I think the only thing I overshared was when I was pregnant 3 years ago!Yeah this weirds me out a bit. I rarely post anything on social media, the odd pics of my cats/ my boyfriend but I haven’t posted anything personal this year. I’ll share funny things on fb though. I always thought I was weird for not sharing my life but actually, I think they’re the weird ones for letting everyone into their lives.
I’m 28, my cousin is 25 and there is a MASSIVE difference with how we use social media. All my friends my age post pictures of holidays/ pets and that’s about it. My cousin and her friends post so many selfies and over share. I’m lucky I was the last gen to not have computers for most of my school kids, I played out on the fields etc. Private life is a happy life, right?
She always has an excuse or a back up - all still bullshit though.
For her Etsy shop she’s doesn’t need to be registered. She needs to have a privacy policy though. Because she is being given the information for legitimate purposes, her privacy policy should state she shares it. However, she cannot obtain data for those free booklets and then use if for something else without telling people. She can voluntarily sign up to the ICO.Can we report her to ICO for not being registered? Not only is she not registered but she’s passing peoples info onto a third party to make and ship these products. That’s a huge breach
Thank you for this. Yes you are quite right, we should say she minimises her tax contributions rather than avoids them. What gets me is her willingness to take from society when she gives so little in return. I can well imagine that in years to come, the pair of them will require NHS treatment for obesity related illnesses, and it's infuriating to think that honest hardworking tax payers will fund this, whilst contributions she should have been making will have been spent on Kate Spade bags, Disney Porn, hot chocolate machines, cat themed shit etc.She is like a cat and has 9 lives. I have no idea how but she does major fuck ups but seems to get away with it.
Tax avoidance and legal tax minimisation are two different things. I agree it is a big accusation but it is justified as others have mentioned and given examples. For the most part she does minimise her liability such as spending the money on equipment, paying for BS courses and buying other blogs/domain names. Perfectly legal and encouraged by most accountants. But things such as buying apple products to flog on ebay a few months later is wrong and that is where she falls foul of the law. And this is where it becomes morally unforgivable.
She also resells on a personal ebay account and does not declare the income.
For the most part she does minimise the liability but there is definitely avoidance/evasion behaviour there too. That's why I don't think it is a stretch to suggest her of it. We've seen her do a couple of key things that would fall into this category. She made a big song and dance about people who buy to resell on a personal ebay but then she sold 5 barbie dolls as her "personal" itemsThank you for this. Yes you are quite right, we should say she minimises her tax contributions rather than avoids them. What gets me is her willingness to take from society when she gives so little in return. I can well imagine that in years to come, the pair of them will require NHS treatment for obesity related illnesses, and it's infuriating to think that honest hardworking tax payers will fund this, whilst contributions she should have been making will have been spent on Kate Spade bags, Disney Porn, hot chocolate machines, cat themed shit etc.
Exactly. Agree on all pointsFor the most part she does minimise the liability but there is definitely avoidance/evasion behaviour there too. That's why I don't think it is a stretch to suggest her of it. We've seen her do a couple of key things that would fall into this category. She made a big song and dance about people who buy to resell on a personal ebay but then she sold 5 barbie dolls as her "personal" items
And I understand where you are coming from but just to say not every overweight person has weight related health problems. Emma will take, take, take to make herself richer but she won't give anything in return regardless of whether it is healthcare, too good to go boxes or general decent human behaviour.
Not at all (well, other than Plague and having to work from home, which I hate because it means no interaction with other living beings other than the cat, Mr D and the nice man from Amazon - vaccine tomorrow, though). I am, however, size 24Are you very stressed? That sounds v high (not a medical professional )
Just looked at the original post - is Tony’s RHR really 90?! Now I’m thinking maybe mine’s not normalhe’s a lot younger than me.
This is the thing it’s not necerssarily about the legality it’s about the ethics of it. Where does the line get drawn? I mean we know she has no ethics but still, I don’t understand how she doesn’t feel some sort of guilt about not paying her fair share of tax. Realistically taxes help everyone and you don’t know when you’re going to need help from over peoples tax payments. It’s all well and good saying oh I’ll never need assistance from the government but if last years taught anything it’s that nothing guaranteed. And also give 10 -15 years and she’s gunna be needing a shit tonne of NHS help if she carry’s on with her lifestyle and I can guarantee she has not contributed barely any of the cost of health assistance she’ll be needingShe is like a cat and has 9 lives. I have no idea how but she does major fuck ups but seems to get away with it.
Tax avoidance and legal tax minimisation are two different things. I agree it is a big accusation but it is justified as others have mentioned and given examples. For the most part she does minimise her liability such as spending the money on equipment, paying for BS courses and buying other blogs/domain names. Perfectly legal and encouraged by most accountants. But things such as buying apple products to flog on ebay a few months later is wrong and that is where she falls foul of the law. And this is where it becomes morally unforgivable.
She also resells on a personal ebay account and does not declare the income.
without sounding like a communist, society only works by helping out everyone around you wether it’s through paying the correct taxes or dropping shopping to a neighbour. Without basic morals and ethical codes society failsThis is the thing it’s not necerssarily about the legality it’s about the ethics of it. Where does the line get drawn? I mean we know she has no ethics but still, I don’t understand how she doesn’t feel some sort of guilt about not paying her fair share of tax. Realistically taxes help everyone and you don’t know when you’re going to need help from over peoples tax payments. It’s all well and good saying oh I’ll never need assistance from the government but if last years taught anything it’s that nothing guaranteed. And also give 10 -15 years and she’s gunna be needing a shit tonne of NHS help if she carry’s on with her lifestyle and I can guarantee she has not contributed barely any of the cost of health assistance she’ll be needing
I fucking ate her
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?