She's said nothing of substance to defend their own position and gone in the attack. It speaks volumes.Jaimi was just 20 in the first pics, so saying 2019 when she was 21 probably sounds more established in her 20s, rather than let people think she may have been involved with a teenager.
Also, she probably doesn't want people working out there was a crossover as I'm pretty sure it was an affair when they got together.
I just found a comment from Jaimi attacking people for questioning why there was a voluntary research assistant role (for a company that makes so much money), Jaimi implies that private schools and their teacher are unethical - but hiring 3 private tutors is ethical!?!
Also, that comments she makes about the role and why it's free are bollocks because she says its for people who can't earn due to benefits and goes on about generously giving expenses. I have volunteered a lot and it's standard to give expenses, i actually thought it was a legal thing because it always happens.
Also, the thing not being able to earn is double bollocks. You can work part time and it not affect your benefits. In fact, if you're just on child tax credits, you will get more benefits working through working tax credits. There is a sweet spot where that tips, and a point where you might as well be on benefits and earn the same amount for working, then you push through that to earning more. Obviously there are factors like childcare being the main one, it's easy to lose money working then, but the role was flexible and remote.
Basically I think it's a cop out and what Jaimi says I know had come straight out of Jess' as she'd said the exact same thing. Jaimi has never been on benefits so wouldn't understand the system, nor Jess actually, come to think of it, if her 12 years of working and studying stands up.
Selling unpaid work as some sort of golden opportunity for poor women is really quite astounding given their line of work. It makes me furious.