I can assure you this website has nothing to do with MSN. A lot of copywriters offer to write guest posts for a fee to put on this website exactly because it gets picked up by the Microsoft Start app and others, giving their articles some kind of legitimacy when in fact they are nothing more than another form of paid advertising. The other staff writers listed on FabWorldToday have very generic American names and given that this website is listed as being based in India, with some of the English of the articles not being quite right, I'll let you deduce whether Mia Rodriguez and friends are really staff writers based in the USA...It depends whether the content creator is doing this on behalf of MSN. If not, I can't imagine MSN would be too pleased & they would want to ensure it didn't look like they were endorsing someone without having made their own checks via in house staff.
In a world of fake news, content managers from organisations with brand names worth protecting are careful about their claims.
It's a bit like when websites use other companies' logos to imply gravitas or endorsement without a relationship or permission from the company.
Some sites have been told to remove the logos.
It's the way she uses her kids to curate her image ("Business-owning, world-changing, single-parent academic girlboss") or as theatrical props in her drama ("Misogynist homophobes are stalking us and putting OUR KIDS in danger!"), when they don't live with her and she doesn't do any day-to-day parenting. They don't seem to exist as people in their own right. They're just walk-on characters in the Jessica Taylor Show, to be used in any way that makes Jess look good. And if you see through that and are uncomfortable with it, well, you're just a misogynist.View attachment 2753039
Well Jess, generally we do disapprove of dads who leave their kids to run off with a much younger woman/man so he can live the high life travelling and bragging about his career, while also enjoying the status that comes with fatherhood. So you can't complain that you're being treated that way for doing the same thing
She claims to keep them off all social media to protect them! As teenage boys they must be mortified by her posts and photos etc, which they and their friends are absolutely going to be seeing.I wonder how much of her new book will be about her kids. I hope for their sakes it isn't, and I really hope she doesn't dwell on things that will hurt them to be shared so publicly.
They're teenagers now, and will be able to read it for themselves.
I did see her comment on someone’s message that the kids ‘are with her’ but this may be her twisting the truth to suit her again I.e they were with her at that moment.It's the way she uses her kids to curate her image ("Business-owning, world-changing, single-parent academic girlboss") or as theatrical props in her drama ("Misogynist homophobes are stalking us and putting OUR KIDS in danger!"), when they don't live with her and she doesn't do any day-to-day parenting. They don't seem to exist as people in their own right. They're just walk-on characters in the Jessica Taylor Show, to be used in any way that makes Jess look good. And if you see through that and are uncomfortable with it, well, you're just a misogynist.
Typical narc. Is clearly the aggressor in that exchange, with the other person being reasonable, but somehow manages to see herself as the victim. Mind blowing.A great example of how she can’t answer simple questions by professionals. And then plays victimView attachment 2753924
She really is such a textbook narcissist isn’t she? I was thinking that reading the post from @AccidentalAcademic. She is always the main character, everybody else exists to meet her needs.Typical narc. Is clearly the aggressor in that exchange, with the other person being reasonable, but somehow manages to see herself as the victim. Mind blowing.
She shared loads of images of them a couple of years ago. I could have picked them both out of a line up. She even set up a page when she home schooled them for that week.She wrote that book about her oldest too, and was always sharing personal information on him. Even without using images of them, she's still finds ways to monetise them which is my absolute number 1 hate of social media 'celebs'.
---
Not to mention that they didn't consent to any of it as babies and aren't old enough to give informed consent now.
I'm quite surprised at her trying to insist on the word 'homicide' seeing as it clearly derives from homo, the Latin word for man! I would have thought her tirade would have been about 'even the word for murder represents the patriarchy, why not femicide?!!' And before she accuses me of elitism and snobbery I went to an inner-city comprehensive, but did have Latin as an option....What is her problem anyway? The wording has been changed to include suicides that may have previously been overlooked. Jesus, she just loves the sound of her own voice! And indeed why the aggression and the constant implication that any questioning is part of a campaign rather than just a question??A great example of how she can’t answer simple questions by professionals. And then plays victimView attachment 2753924
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?