A woman set it up after the loss of her baby, James didn’t set that up himselfThat’s just hilarious. Why Black bereaved mothers specifically? That’s such as strange charity demographic. Why are they more in need than white bereaved mothers, or black bereaved fathers?
I can’t understand how James doesn’t know he is a basically a parody account (of himself).
it’s just him attempting to prove he isn't racist "I'm not racist, I donated to a charity supported black mothers!" in the same way that people say "I'm not racist - i have a black friend" as if they proves anything. and tbh, people who say that kind of thing usually ARE racist. especially given that he shared photo to prove a point after using the term "coloured people".That’s just hilarious. Why Black bereaved mothers specifically? That’s such as strange charity demographic. Why are they more in need than white bereaved mothers, or black bereaved fathers?
I can’t understand how James doesn’t know he is a basically a parody account (of himself).
"If we don't help her, she will be alone cold, and very vulnerable"I was just scrolling through my Twitter feed. I never cross the streams ie I don’t follow anyone who I talk about on Tattle.
But this appeared on my feed. James is paying for ad space!
View attachment 2685980
Hang on a second - these are paid for by donations aren't they? Why are people paying them back? Depher is getting the money twice then?Is there no end to this man’s talents? He’s also a loan shark too
It appears so - not to mention the fact they absolutely are NOT authorised to be loaning money to anyone let alone the vulnerable!!Hang on a second - these are paid for by donations aren't they? Why are people paying them back? Depher is getting the money twice then?
What’s all this about hardcore porn he’s been viewing? I bet babs won’t be happy with our Jimmy🫠
Does he have any authority to lend people money through a CIC? This simply must be reported.Is there no end to this man’s talents? He’s also a loan shark too
He would be much better off legally if he had just given out away, IMHO (I am not a lawyer). Running an ad hoc lending scheme as a CIC seems really risky, financially and legally. Also donating money to random fundraisers.£2,400 repayable at £2 per week = 23 years. He's given that money away
I am a lawyer and what he’s doing tells me he isn’t or he wouldn’t sleep for anxiety. He is so problematic it is unreal.He would be much better off legally if he had just given out away, IMHO (I am not a lawyer). Running an ad hoc lending scheme as a CIC seems really risky, financially and legally. Also donating money to random fundraisers.
In the kindest interpretation*, James is motivated by wanting to help people in need who are vulnerable. But as soon as you are doing that with other people's money through a legally recognised vehicle ( a CIC) you can't just do whatever you feel like doing. I can see it must feel frustrating to think that you're trying to help and be criticised at every turn, but there are legal and financial obligations that come with trying to do this kind of thing.
*I'm more leaning towards less kind interpretations myself, including buying a nice car through the business and showering himself in glory and media attention, but let's give him the benefit of the doubt
No he absolutely does not have any authority to lend people money. Especially not those who are destitute and vulnerable.Does he have any authority to lend people money through a CIC? This simply must be reported.
How would he mitigate for:
How he assessed them, and under what criteria
How he will assure the money is paid back in full and therefore able to be used for its original purpose?
What would he do if the family refused to pay or disappeared?
His resharing of a bunch of people he’s “helped” make me feel ill. One man pictured with his invoice has “91 years old, prostate problems” on.I do not like anyone who posts pictures, faces or not, of vulnerable people as part of so-called altruistic acts that are the exact opposite
BIB - YES, exactly this. I have worked for large charities in the past and I remember getting into an argument with a friend who wanted to set up her own charity and "Do it right, without spending money on admin or people." It's admin and people that ensure you fulfil your stated charitable objectives effectively, efficiently and transparently with the money that is donated to you by well-meaning people who want to help the cause you purport to support.CIC are the Chancers dream, Jodie marsh has One as well. It’s like a charity for thickos and/or con artists.
Charities are not easy or cheap to run but I’ve no qualms with larger charities who are open about it. I’ve no idea what James is running beyond a vanity product funded by the very people he purports to help.
>>
I know I sound like a miserable bitch but I get so pissed off at the amount of charity scams out there, it’s horrendous
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?