Depher/CPH CIC #5 No Weddings and One Funeral

[CuriousTherapyCat]

No wonder he’s now trying to deny everything.
He could be facing many charges and fines

fraud by misrepresentation
Smoking in a workplace (allowing as an employer)
GDPR fines/ convictions
And the CIC struck off.
possibly more

 

[gimm3more]

No wonder he’s now trying to deny everything.
He could be facing many charges and fines

fraud by misrepresentation
Smoking in a workplace (allowing as an employer)
GDPR fines/ convictions
And the CIC struck off.
possibly more

Yeh I don’t think “it was a mistake” and “I did it because trolls” will hold up in a court of law lmfao

 

[Tin Can Crook]

Find it interesting that he felt the need to tell everybody about the incident with his ex partner where he pushed her over when there was nothing about that in the documentary. I suspect there's a lot that's still not been unearthed.
---
He's back to reposting old work. We saw these the other week.

 

[FlashBoof]

Praying the BBC release the full unedited footage - lizard fondling and all, to counter his claims. My god, there will be a couple of hours there absolute minimum, for us to cackle at. They record everything - even when setting up and taking down, in the hope of an indiscreet ‘off camera’ comment or hot mike moment. As evidenced by the recording of them entering and walking up the stairs/shaking hands.

 

[lilykestrel]

"this is the side of James that people don't really see"

it's on the socials?

wonder if it was a Bombay Bad Boy

 

[gimm3more]

"this is the side of James that people don't really see"

it's on the socials?

wonder if it was a Bombay Bad Boy

None of that foreign muck for r Jimmy, thanks!

 

[Girty Drifter]

Where is this ‘John Wiseman Brown’ during all this? I’m beginning to wonder if there’s a bit of a story there tbh.

 

[gimm3more]

Anyone know why this random toothless woman is his fb cover photo?!
Notice how he changed “BCAv” (which he still uses on TikTok) to “TBC”. James your reward was rescinded you moron. And “TBC” isn’t a bleeping official title.

 

[lilykestrel]

I've just given myself a headache trying to parse this

(a) 'we strongly believe that the BBC have used a post of the noose with a picture of Joyce'

well no. They showed you the picture that was posted of you and Joyce, alongside the post about the suicide rescue. They then showed you a separate post you made of the noose, referring to the same story.

(b) 'we also have proof that these individuals have been working with the both journalists'

well done Sherlock, that's not up for debate

(c) 'the BBC have only shown 2 photos, one of Joyce with her face covered and the noose picture, without any of the other photos of Joyce that were shown in the article'

i) see (a)
ii) but also, not true, at two points in the film they showed multiple posts using the original picture of James and Joyce against all the other posts about her, and then the post alongside the suicide story with the photo of Joyce with her face covered
iii) but also, if they were shown with the article that reports on the film, then the BBC have shown them. But they'd shown them anyway, because they were in the film

 

[gimm3more]

View attachment 2943254

I've just given myself a headache trying to parse this

(a) 'we strongly believe that the BBC have used a post of the noose with a picture of Joyce'

well no. They showed you the picture that was posted of you and Joyce, alongside the post about the suicide rescue. They then showed you a separate post you made of the noose, referring to the same story.

(b) 'we also have proof that these individuals have been working with the both journalists'

well done Sherlock, that's not up for debate

(c) 'the BBC have only shown 2 photos, one of Joyce with her face covered and the noose picture, without any of the other photos of Joyce that were shown in the article'

i) see (a)
ii) but also, not true, at two points in the film they showed multiple posts using the original picture of James and Joyce against all the other posts about her, and then the post alongside the suicide story with the photo of Joyce with her face covered
iii) but also, if they were shown with the article that reports on the film, then the BBC have shown them. But they'd shown them anyway, because they were in the film

I genuinely don’t think he’ll stop any of this unless:
a) the cash completely runs out (we know he had £600k cash at hand by April 2023)
b) he is arrested and charged (although he would probably keep at the social media tit and long lies of defence he uses)
c) the CIC is struck off.

 

[MurielSnark]

I genuinely don’t think he’ll stop any of this unless:
a) the cash completely runs out (we know he had £600k cash at hand by April 2023)
b) he is arrested and charged (although he would probably keep at the social media tit and long lies of defence he uses)
c) the CIC is struck off.

Or

d) a bunch of Depher victims (or their next of kin) form a class action lawsuit (or whatever the UK equivalent is) and sue the fuckin' pants off him.

 

[ahkrin]

If he's such a top bloke he must have loads of friends. Why are none of them telling him to stop posting?

 

[L3moning]

If he's such a top bloke he must have loads of friends. Why are none of them telling him to stop posting?

Because they know he'd call them "criminal trolls" if they did!

 

[Seaford Haggington]

What a load of shite! He wrote a massive prebuttal FB post on May 8th denying lots of stuff that the BBC had asked him about and vaguely accusing trolls but said nothing about photos being doctored! He’s too thick to see how this just shows what a liar he is!

"BBC News and online trolls..."

 

[CuriousTherapyCat]

I genuinely don’t think he’ll stop any of this unless:
a) the cash completely runs out (we know he had £600k cash at hand by April 2023)
b) he is arrested and charged (although he would probably keep at the social media tit and long lies of defence he uses)
c) the CIC is struck off.

I don’t think he’d stop if CIC is struck off

 

[gimm3more]

I don’t think he’d stop if CIC is struck off

Well he wouldn’t have a business or license to trade so he would legally have to. Unless he set up a private Ltd company

 

[Seaford Haggington]

Because he can't transfer the money out of the CIC when it is closes (because of the asset lock) he has a perverse incentive to burn through the money in there if he senses the end is nigh.

 

[Tin Can Crook]

Right. Let’s put this “the trolls doctored the photos” narrative to bed for us viewers at home. The BBC will undoubtedly have proof that James posted those now deleted tweets. Here’s a little evidence that they are not edited by anybody outside of Depher.

Here is James this morning claiming that he never posted an image of Joyce with that story.

Archived here.

Here is the tweet. You want to know where I took this screenshot? On the wayback machine. It was archived on the 12th of June 2022 when he wrote and published that tweet associating the picture of Joyce with the fabricated suicide story. It cannot be doctored, it has been archived on the web for everybody to see coming from his account.

It was a challenge tracking down this archive link as the tweets are deleted and it wasn't readily available on the archive of his acocunt URL but it’s here and it’s indisputable.

Now, I’m sure James might want to argue that he doesn’t control the depheruk twitter account any more. The handle was taken over by somebody else a while back now. However, at the time this tweet was made and archived, he was in control of the account. There is plenty of evidence of this.

If you go to an archive of his website from the same time period this tweet was published,

And click on the twitter icon in the top left corner, it takes you straight to the depheruk twitter account archive. He was promoting that twitter account as his account at the time. If it wasn’t his twitter, why would he be promoting it?

Sidenote: Many of the archives that are more readily available (I had to really mess around to find the above ones now that the tweets are deleted and direct links aren’t searchable) are linked to his harassment of BWC and the other victims. Archiving is wonderful because it’s hard for people like James to claim screenshots were tampered with when the full webpage is archived in its original form. Those who have been archiving his misgivings for a long time have done a lot to discredit him. I’m unsure whether the Joyce tweet was manually archived by somebody or it was done by a bot as a routine scrape but the archived website and proof that this is his account is almost certainly related to their manual archival work.

Trolls didn't do this. You did, James.

Editing to add: The noose photo, I've not managed to secure an archive of it but there was a now deleted tweet on the 13th of August 2023 regarding it.

 

[Girty Drifter]

Where is this ‘John Wiseman Brown’ during all this? I’m beginning to wonder if there’s a bit of a story there tbh.

QMLAN. I’ve dug a bit. His house (the address listed the first time he was a director of Depher) was listed on rightmove October 23, but records still state that the last time it was sold was 2012, so assume it was taken off the market for whatever reason. He certainly didn’t stay in it unless some serious reno was done as the place was pretty much gutted in the RM pictures.

He was reinstated as a director in Feb ‘24.

 

[mchops]

He won't be fitting boilers much longer . He won't be gas safe. He'll be struck off.