Quoth the Depher, "not no more"‘Not no more’ for thread title
If we could work a 'discusting' in too that would be great‘Not no more’ for thread title
(tbh ‘their truths and my mistakes’ should probably be in there somewhere too
And why would any parent consent to all of those conditions? Crazy.He just doxxed a four year old. I censored the name. I'm shocked. He really is that stupid.
View attachment 2937112
DPA 2018 / GDPR include several relevant principles here:He just doxxed a four year old. I censored the name. I'm shocked. He really is that stupid.
View attachment 2937112
Done, but I would encourage a ‘strength in numbers’ approach.The way it's not only for the CIC but for his personal use as James Anderson, it just makes me sick.
I think the ICO needs to be alerted again because he should not be posting the full names of infants, identifying them as somebody who has received support from his organisation. It's incredibly inappropriate and exploitative.
Absolute NONCE'I give permission for a video of my child to be used on any James Anderson Social Media pages'
Omg how could he even include that?
He is such a dangerous fool.
That is the worst example of a completed consent form he could have chosen.DPA 2018 / GDPR include several relevant principles here:
- lawful & fair - consent must be given &/or the processing must be necessary
- data must be accurate & up to date
- held no longer than necessary
- kept secure
Likewise there are several rights that individuals have, including:
- the right to erasure or to restrict processing
- the right to rectification
In fact, the withdrawal of consent alone may be enough to deem the processing of the personal data against the provisions of this legislation.
Someone's forgotten their GDPR training, haven't they?!
GAS! PPE!
im confused with this form. It does look as if they’ve crossed out everything but the bottom one. Meaning they’ve not consented to anything and they have read and understood.That is the worst example of a completed consent form he could have chosen.
Only the last box is ticked, so not unambiguous as is required by GDPR and ICO
View attachment 2937402
And surely all the ticks on the right would void it (for such a sensitive subject?im confused with this form. It does look as if they’ve crossed out everything but the bottom one. Meaning they’ve not consented to anything and they have read and understood.
(it’s also a copy and paste template)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?