Apologies if I’ve missed it but do we know that the BBC thing is TV and not radio?
Well, given the r*pe allegations I wouldn’t hold your breath…He knows that, just as a person can give consent, a person also has the right to withdraw consent, right?
Oh do shut up Girty, of course he doesn’t, and he will utterly disbelieve any one who tells him this.
Good point. The radio programme on the Post Office scandal was outstanding.Apologies if I’ve missed it but do we know that the BBC thing is TV and not radio?
Yeh he says BBC have an agenda but I have posted on here previously that BBC have actually been one of his biggest cheerleaders and have been complicit in his grift for years - including referring to Depher as a charity and charitable organisation. They deserve to backtrack and actually publish the truth about Saint Jimmy.Good point. The radio programme on the Post Office scandal was outstanding.
Speaking of radio Jimmy was interviewed Feb 23 for Radio 4s 'Gap Finders' - so he can't say the BBC have always had an agenda.
It's worth a listen if you can get past the gums smacking
The interviewer asks if he has a god complex and he says 'I believe in God'. And lots of sentimentality as usual.
He also says they had 67 subcontractors all over the UK - did we know this? He never mentions them or any boiler work outside of the Burnley area does he?
![]()
You and Yours - Gap Finders - James Anderson - BBC Sounds
The plumber offering free and discounted services to disabled and elderly people.www.bbc.co.uk
Notice how he’s not actually denying it?View attachment 2922706
I just don't get his argument here. He keeps saying 'can't be me as that isn't my name' instead of ever saying 'can't be me as I didn't do it and I consider it libellous to even suggest that'. Surely it is easily proven one way or the other?
Quoting myself just to apologise for referring to this twitter user as a dissenter. I was trying to explain the validity of what she was saying and the implications of her being interviewed to provide further context and by "dissenter" I meant somebody who objects to the actions and behaviours of James Anderson/Depher. I did not meant to cause offense or imply it was a bad thing to be calling him out and will refrain from using the term again. Sorry to have upset anybody by saying this.Cant remember if this was posted here but here's what the green witch (one of his main dissenters) has said regarding the BBC for those not on twitter. She was one of the people interviewed.
It's been passed by legal so if there is a criminal record it'll all have been okayed and verified.
View attachment 2922548
I understood it that way but can see why she isn’t happy - I just refer to her as MG whenever she has something to shareQuoting myself just to apologise for referring to this twitter user as a dissenter. I was trying to explain the validity of what she was saying and the implications of her being interviewed to provide further context and by "dissenter" I meant somebody who objects to the actions and behaviours of James Anderson/Depher. I did not meant to cause offense or imply it was a bad thing to be calling him out and will refrain from using the term again. Sorry to have upset anybody by saying this.
I didn’t see the upset but I think it was clear what you meant. Anyone with a lick of sense can tell the general tone on these threads and that nobody here is saying it’s bad to call him out. You just run out of ways to describe the people when you’re not allowed to use names/usernames.Quoting myself just to apologise for referring to this twitter user as a dissenter. I was trying to explain the validity of what she was saying and the implications of her being interviewed to provide further context and by "dissenter" I meant somebody who objects to the actions and behaviours of James Anderson/Depher. I did not meant to cause offense or imply it was a bad thing to be calling him out and will refrain from using the term again. Sorry to have upset anybody by saying this.
As AIM is all through schools as far as I can tell, I’d be having strong words with the headteacher and getting them to go after Saint Jim.I know he's a nasty piece of work and it might not be worth it depending on your situation but personally if he had pictures of any of the kids in my family on his posts and refused to take them down I'd be collaring him on his doorstep the sweaty little herbert.
Imagine booking a jolly plumber and he turns upI think it’ll be very easily proven considering he has gone by that name and his age and location lines up.
I don’t get the link or the need for him to be even doing that. All DEPHER does is pump cash into AIM. That’s it. There should be no need for Jimmy to be posting photos of the kids taking part in their activities. He’s not personally there making the kids work up a sweat by chasing them with a screwdriver. Absolute weirdoAs AIM is all through schools as far as I can tell, I’d be having strong words with the headteacher and getting them to go after Saint Jim.
There are so many red flags with this latest stunt of his, I don’t know where to begin.I don’t get the link or the need for him to be even doing that. All DEPHER does is pump cash into AIM. That’s it. There should be no need for Jimmy to be posting photos of the kids taking part in their activities. He’s not personally there making the kids work up a sweat by chasing them with a screwdriver. Absolute weirdo
Just checking in to make sure they haven’t died yet probsIf I recall correctly he's made some pretty weird posts about lifelong visits to some people so I'm wondering if he means services when he talks about that?