Loving the financial detective work and debate guys, keep it coming. My view based on everything you guys have put forward is somewhere in tjr middle. I think the family have bailed them out in the past and they have definitely misrepresented it - making out the super stressful boss babe investor buyout was to regain total control over the business rather than a family backed divestment of a failing business. And as others have suggested any investment the Woodwards or Mills made would all be very sensibly managed/ advised on - if necessary used as losses against their massive income or gains every year
![Nauseated face :nauseated_face: 🤢](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f922.png)
I work in valuation for tax purposes so see some trust structures and it appals me how little tax these people often get away with paying
The most importnat thing is that for people like this, Ella, Matt and their children's personal assets and standard of living will never be at risk. They're never going to lose their million pound house in London and their kids are always going to go to private school. Somehow they will always manage to shield themselves from personal loss and that's why it's so false and unbelievable when she acts like she's any sort of self made woman because she will never know what it's like to not have the most luxurious of safety nets.
Making out she is a working mum working all hours God sends to make or break her (silly vanity) business, with kids sick from nursery... it's just an insult to people who really are in that situation when she could just 'call your dad and he would stop it all'