I always thought AIBU was a panel show like Would I Lie To You
After reading this thread I'm on ep 4, series 1 and loving it!
You can kind of understand leaving something on a cliffhanger. But to just leave out jens entire motive was weird
I also loved season 2, and also much prefer her season 1 lipsI loved series 2, absolutely brilliant. Her lips look terrible.
The landlord sounds like a major gob, grade II listed doesn’t mandate that only F&B can be used. As per the pictures it doesn’t even stop unsympathetic modern barn house renovations! We’re in a listed building and I’m a scummy valsper colour match girl. Not yet been imprisoned for crimes against national heritage for doing so£17k a month to rent? Without sounding like “that person”, why doesn’t she just buy? Tbh she sounds like a nightmare
Also why would the landlord leave the keys to quad bikes if they weren't to be used?£17k a month to rent? Without sounding like “that person”, why doesn’t she just buy? Tbh she sounds like a nightmare
My thoughts exactly. Interesting pics they’ve chosen to go with in that article. The house was apparently painted in heritage approved colours to go with its historic listing but the kitchen looks a generic Instagram new build and the bedroom furniture and decor is straight from the 1980’s. And she can’t keep pets because the landlady’s daughter is allergic to cats? wtf, man. I’m suspicious of an allergy that’s affecting her from a house she doesn’t even Iive in.The landlord sounds like a major gob, grade II listed doesn’t mandate that only F&B can be used. As per the pictures it doesn’t even stop unsympathetic modern barn house renovations! We’re in a listed building and I’m a scummy valsper colour match girl. Not yet been imprisoned for crimes against national heritage for doing sowhat a terminal grade snob.
100%, she’s maliciously weaponising heritage policies which imo is really against the spirit of preserving community heritage? Like the whole idea is to be a steward for future generations to enjoy seeing their local history still in existence in their area. Not be a hateful troll to anyone who doesn’t comply with your narrow minded idea of what a listed property must look like. It’s sadly not that uncommon. If she was so concerned about heritage I’d argue that she wouldn’t rent it out?My thoughts exactly. Interesting pics they’ve chosen to go with in that article. The house was apparently painted in heritage approved colours to go with its historic listing but the kitchen looks a generic Instagram new build and the bedroom furniture and decor is straight from the 1980’s. And she can’t keep pets because the landlady’s daughter is allergic to cats? wtf, man. I’m suspicious of an allergy that’s affecting her from a house she doesn’t even Iive in.
Not to defend DMC, but if the landlady wants to keep her property looking like a show home, don’t rent it out. Painting a room a different colour isn’t structural damage and if I was paying 17 grand a month to live there I’d tell her to shove it up her a.
Agree, I don’t think it paints either of them in a good light, I should have been clearer in my original post!I'm honestly baffled by paying £17k to rent somewhere, would you not just buy a (smaller) house?
That's £200k a year on rent
I suspect both parties here are hard work, the landlady sounds demanding and I can't imagine DMC is the easiest tenant to deal with either!
More common than you thinkAnd she can’t keep pets because the landlady’s daughter is allergic to cats? wtf, man. I’m suspicious of an allergy that’s affecting her from a house she doesn’t even Iive in.
It also works both ways. Not allowing pets shuts out potential customers who want or already have pets.Some tenants also don't consider houses that have had animals in them for the above reason, so landlord feel like they're shutting out potential customers basically