Daisy May Cooper #2

New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I always thought AIBU was a panel show like Would I Lie To You 😂 After reading this thread I'm on ep 4, series 1 and loving it!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 8
You can kind of understand leaving something on a cliffhanger. But to just leave out jens entire motive was weird
We are literally no further forward with Jen than we were in S1. No idea if she likes Daisy May's character or hates her. Does she like the women she stalks? And why on earth would Nik trust her with her big secret after the memorial stunt?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
I couldn’t make it to the end of Season 2 and gave up. I think she is a talented writer and all the interviews she does she comes across really down to earth and aware of her fame, her enhancements etc. I just think there was too much of a gap between S1 and S2. Also far too many side characters in S2 that were just hit and miss.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
Loved Season 1, and started off enjoying Season 2 (other than being utterly distracted by Daisy’s lips) but then it just descended into a load of old rubbish, trying too hard to be surreal and quirky, but actually falling flat and not funny. So disappointed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
I love Am I Being Unreasonable? And I think DMC is mostly brilliant (was disappointed by her on NMTB) but I don’t know about her glow up. I saw her talking about series 2 of AIBU taking place just half an hour after the end of series 1 but that she’s had her lips done, so one minute she has “no lips” and then the next she has filler. I think it’s a bit more than lips, isn’t it?! To me, she looks like Handsome Squidward.
IMG_2274.jpeg
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 19
I thought series 2 was awful, one of the most bizarre shows I've ever seen. Nothing like series 1 and had to stop halfway through
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
I re-watched season 1 before 2. Watching them together, (aside from her looking completely different) the worst bits were the forced jokes. Watching them together it really showed how they went away from good storytelling to making "wacky out-there jokes". The taxi scene was painful and I hate to say it because I love Charlie, but his whole character was so off and unnecessarily weird. I get his bit was needed to feed her fears but why make him such a lame joke of a stereotype?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
£17k a month to rent? Without sounding like “that person”, why doesn’t she just buy? Tbh she sounds like a nightmare
The landlord sounds like a major gob, grade II listed doesn’t mandate that only F&B can be used. As per the pictures it doesn’t even stop unsympathetic modern barn house renovations! We’re in a listed building and I’m a scummy valsper colour match girl. Not yet been imprisoned for crimes against national heritage for doing so 😂 what a terminal grade snob.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 41
The landlord sounds like a major gob, grade II listed doesn’t mandate that only F&B can be used. As per the pictures it doesn’t even stop unsympathetic modern barn house renovations! We’re in a listed building and I’m a scummy valsper colour match girl. Not yet been imprisoned for crimes against national heritage for doing so 😂 what a terminal grade snob.
My thoughts exactly. Interesting pics they’ve chosen to go with in that article. The house was apparently painted in heritage approved colours to go with its historic listing but the kitchen looks a generic Instagram new build and the bedroom furniture and decor is straight from the 1980’s. And she can’t keep pets because the landlady’s daughter is allergic to cats? wtf, man. I’m suspicious of an allergy that’s affecting her from a house she doesn’t even Iive in.

Not to defend DMC, but if the landlady wants to keep her property looking like a show home, don’t rent it out. Painting a room a different colour isn’t structural damage and if I was paying 17 grand a month to live there I’d tell her to shove it up her a.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 47
My thoughts exactly. Interesting pics they’ve chosen to go with in that article. The house was apparently painted in heritage approved colours to go with its historic listing but the kitchen looks a generic Instagram new build and the bedroom furniture and decor is straight from the 1980’s. And she can’t keep pets because the landlady’s daughter is allergic to cats? wtf, man. I’m suspicious of an allergy that’s affecting her from a house she doesn’t even Iive in.

Not to defend DMC, but if the landlady wants to keep her property looking like a show home, don’t rent it out. Painting a room a different colour isn’t structural damage and if I was paying 17 grand a month to live there I’d tell her to shove it up her a.
100%, she’s maliciously weaponising heritage policies which imo is really against the spirit of preserving community heritage? Like the whole idea is to be a steward for future generations to enjoy seeing their local history still in existence in their area. Not be a hateful troll to anyone who doesn’t comply with your narrow minded idea of what a listed property must look like. It’s sadly not that uncommon. If she was so concerned about heritage I’d argue that she wouldn’t rent it out? 🤷‍♀️

£17k per month gives her plenty of margin to pay a local trade to come out and paint it back to a colour on the made up approved list that her made up heritage officer gave her 🤥
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18
I'm honestly baffled by paying £17k to rent somewhere, would you not just buy a (smaller) house?
That's £200k a year on rent 😱

I suspect both parties here are hard work, the landlady sounds demanding and I can't imagine DMC is the easiest tenant to deal with either!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 25
I'm honestly baffled by paying £17k to rent somewhere, would you not just buy a (smaller) house?
That's £200k a year on rent 😱

I suspect both parties here are hard work, the landlady sounds demanding and I can't imagine DMC is the easiest tenant to deal with either!
Agree, I don’t think it paints either of them in a good light, I should have been clearer in my original post!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
And she can’t keep pets because the landlady’s daughter is allergic to cats? wtf, man. I’m suspicious of an allergy that’s affecting her from a house she doesn’t even Iive in.
More common than you think

Apparently, a lot of landlords are still banning/refusing pets, though this as a reason may be more specific to cats, because their fur gets everywhere and if the next tenant has an allergy they have would have to get the whole place professionally cleaned for that specific purpose (it's not just a good hoover basically)

Some tenants also don't consider houses that have had animals in them for the above reason, so landlord feel like they're shutting out potential customers basically
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Some tenants also don't consider houses that have had animals in them for the above reason, so landlord feel like they're shutting out potential customers basically
It also works both ways. Not allowing pets shuts out potential customers who want or already have pets.
I’m probably biased though. OT, but I hate the way the housing market has gone, where houses are seen as an investment rather than somewhere to make a home. I have no real skin in the game atm, as we bought our house to live in and intend to stay there til we die, but it worries me what the future holds for my kids.

Back to DMC though. Agree with everyone saying it’s bonkers to shell that much money out when she could just buy something. I also wonder how she’s affording it. I honestly wouldn’t imagine she’s earning that amount for that lifestyle. Her house on her stories during lockdown seemed much smaller.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 14
The rental rules are changing in the summer and landlords can't refuse pets amongst other things my landlord is selling up we when move out because he doesn't want to be told who he can't rent to
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4