I agree with you especially the one in the white bikini but her parents are ok with itIm sorry but I dont agree with Kaci's latest insta pictures. At the end of the day shes still a child.
I agree with you especially the one in the white bikini but her parents are ok with itIm sorry but I dont agree with Kaci's latest insta pictures. At the end of the day shes still a child.
Im sorry but I dont agree with Kaci's latest insta pictures. At the end of the day shes still a child.
If it had her face in the picture and wasnt just focused on her top then I would agree with you but its taken to look 'sexy' regardless of if anything is on display.Thereâs nothing wrong with it , sheâs wearing a crop top and what looks like cargo pants ⌠literally nothing is on show besides her stomach, if someone looks at it and sexualises her from it then thatâs on them as sheâs not showing anything explicit at all
If it had her face in the picture and wasnt just focused on her top then I would agree with you but its taken to look 'sexy' regardless of if anything is on display.
Its what she wants it to come across as, otherwise she would have included her face. The top is basically see through and she has her thumb down her trousers.But thatâs you taking it as sexy . Sheâs not put any inappropriate body parts on display , itâs you that is seeing it as a sexy image when all the has out is her stomach
Its what she wants it to come across as, otherwise she would have included her face. The top is basically see through and she has her thumb down her trousers.
Im all for girls can wear what they want and it shouldnt be a sign for abuse ect but there is no way I would like my 16 yr old pose like that.
If youre happy for a 16 year old to pose like that though then good for you. I would personally like to protect my daughters modesty as a child and teach her she doesn't need to take photos like that to attract attention and 'likes' from strangers on the Internet.
Id agree with you if she wasnt posting it to thousands of strangers!Wow âitâs what she wants â has she told you that ? No . What youâre doing is sexualising a child for what sheâs wearing , sheâs taken a picture of her outfit with nothing inappropriate showing , that top is actually lined if youâd ever seen it in person.
Thereâs nothing not modest about only showing her stomach .
You are the problem sexualising the photo saying itâs what she wants , sheâs showing abit of her belly and everything is covered
Id agree with you if she wasnt posting it to thousands of strangers!
Itâs very easy to shame the people who are showing concern for these kids with this âitâs you thatâs making it sexualâ line. Do you know who doesnât care if âitâs on themâ that theyâre making it sexual? Do you know the kinds of people that are being handed this kind of material on a plate? Of course itâs vile, disgusting and unfair but it happens. Thatâs why people donât want pictures of kids like this online. Shaming people who are concerned might shut them up but rather than empowering the kids or whatever, all it does is put them at risk.But if those strangers are sexualising her like you are then theyâre the problem not Kaci ! Your problem should be with people sexualising children not a child thatâs posting something thatâs not explicit
Itâs very easy to shame the people who are showing concern for these kids with this âitâs you thatâs making it sexualâ line. Do you know who doesnât care if âitâs on themâ that theyâre making it sexual? Do you know the kinds of people that are being handed this kind of material on a plate? Of course itâs vile, disgusting and unfair but it happens. Thatâs why people donât want pictures of kids like this online. Shaming people who are concerned might shut them up but rather than empowering the kids or whatever, all it does is put them at risk.
No one is shaming Kaci. Her parents shouldnât be allowing her to post things like this. It all lies with them.My problem is instead of shaming Kaci for posting this photo which many people shams women and teens for why they post they should be more interested in the people that have disgusting views . Itâs her body she should be able to post it as she chooses without shame and if someone sexualises it then people should be more focused on them instead of shaming Kaci for posting a completely normal photo with nothing showing
Why should she have to dress modestly? That may be your view but itâs not necessarily hers or her parents, which is absolutely fine.Im sorry but that corest top is not modest at all. It is also not a bloody top so why r people wearing it out as if it is
Because her body should be normal what shouldnât be normal is the perverts sexualising herWhy are we normalising underage girls walking around inappropriate corsets? When we know how many disgusting perverts exist.
Im sorry but as a mother id never let my child walk out looking like that
Fair point and I couldnât agree more! Those girls are the reason their channel is so big. Theyâre the driest couple on social media without their children. I donât think the girls will struggle money wise, as their social media and opportunities start to grow, I just find it incredibly sad that their parents clearly have completely forgot âthe struggleâ they claim to have gone through as first time parents. Baffles me how they havenât even tried to instil some humbleness and work ethic knowing what itâs like to be on the breadline.In a normal set up, Iâd agree with you. But itâs pretty much all the girls money. Realistically no one is tuning in for the parents alone and Joelâs rough cut editing before it goes to the actual editor isnât going to be much so all the familyâs money is down to the girls. Obviously Iâd rather see it put away for them (or them to not be used online at all) but Iâd rather see it wasted on designer gear for them then sitting in the bank accounts of their work shy, exploitive parents. I know the girls arenât learning anything that way but itâs really the tip of the iceberg problem wise. Canât even imagine how much the parents will be claiming as their share while they sit in their arse for it.