I'm laughing at the tenuous 'study'. But then you knew that.
There's no evidence anyone did go on to develop CJD after taking a vaccine.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
There's no evidence anyone did go on to develop CJD after taking a vaccine.
Must be a bizarre coincidence that they developed it so soon after getting vaccinated. Must be alarming enough for all those involved in the study and those who peer reviewed it. But yeah so funny.
Just saw your wee edit. Yes I did know you’re laughing at the study, one which talks about vaccinated people who went on to develop CJD. Thanks for verifying my point. If you think that’s funny I feel sorry for you.
In case you missed it:
In order for CJD diagnosis to be associated with the vaccine, the cause-effect relationship between them must be revealed. Therefore, further studies are needed in this area.
Jesse didn’t believe the wet market theory’s and was made out to be a liar.
nypost.com
NIH director confirms agency hid early COVID genes at request of Chinese scientists
National Institutes of Health Acting Director Lawrence Tabek confirmed that US health officials concealed early genomic sequences of COVID-19 at the request of Chinese scientists.
nypost.com
No I didn’t miss it I can read thanks. Like I say it must be a bizarre coincidence for all those involved in the study and those peer reviewing taking such an interest in it. As always you’re right the vaccine won’t do no harm and everyone else in the world is wrong.
I am indeed right. Glad you're finally seeing it.
NIH ADMITS to funding gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses at China's Wuhan lab despite Dr. Fauci repeatedly insisting to Congress that it did not happen
NIH ADMITS to funding gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses
The National Institutes of Health has finally admitted to funding gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses in it's Wuhan laboratory despite Dr. Fauci's constant denials to congress.
www.dailymail.co.uk
Just you carry on laughing at a study about people who have CJD after having vaccines. What a charmer.
Will do.
Exactly, conclusions cannot really be drawn. The title “Alarming New Data Confirms COVID Vaccine Link to Fatal Brain Disorder” is a tad misleading as it has not been 100% confirmed.
My sister was telling me today of 2 clients she has who have recently got neurological problems after their boosters.
Someone posts possible vaccine side effects/damage and immediately, sure as night follows day,up pops the usual suspects who for some unfathomable reasons find it funny to pour scorn and denial all over peoples suffering. Talk about insulting.
Someone posts possible vaccine side effects/damage and immediately, sure as night follows day,up pops the usual suspects who for some unfathomable reasons find it funny to pour scorn and denial all over peoples suffering. Talk about insulting.
Safe and effective baby powder
www.reuters.com
J&J knew for decades that asbestos lurked in its Baby Powder
Johnson & Johnson says its Baby Powder is safe. But Reuters found its talc was sometimes tainted with asbestos, a fact it kept from regulators and the public.
Yep. Someone who gets it rather than someone who tries to twist what I'm saying. But then that's always been their MO, as they do it with you too.
Wait until it’s on YouTube might be more credible then!
It’s pretty clear what you are trying to say as well as what can be concluded from that study.Yep. Someone who gets it rather than someone who tries to twist what I'm saying. But then that's always been their MO, as they do it with you too.
Well, you think it's credible if it's posted on some rando Twitter account.
The study itself concluded -
“In order for CJD diagnosis to be associated with the vaccine, the cause-effect relationship between them must be revealed. Therefore, further studies are needed in this area.”
The YouTube video cited an opinion and anecdotal experience. The tweet linked a peer reviewed study - not quite the same. But you know that.Well, you think it's credible if it's posted on some rando Twitter account.
Must be a case of parotitis going around here think this is the third time this has been quoted, getting abit boring for everyone else reading the thread. Incase you’ve not established everyone here can in fact read.
A peer reviewed study that had no clear conclusion, yeah.
- Status