Yeah, my brother and sister both have children. I'd back whatever they decide is right for their children.
After all, it's their call and, as intelligent people, I trust them to do their own research and come to their own decision based on that.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
After all, it's their call and, as intelligent people, I trust them to do their own research and come to their own decision based on that.
Well, yes, but obviously different parents have different views on how they protect.Even for those with little intelligence the instinct is to protect
To the best of their ability as they see it.
You do have to wait . I thought it was 3 months (for kids ) between infection and vaccine? maybe contact your GP or vaccine centre and they’ll advise you .
Maybe those litter grabbers could come in useful for more than rubbishSurely it's better to just refrain for a week or so.
https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-infections-rise-by-nearly-half-a-million-in-a-week-12635566COVID-19: Infections rise by nearly half a million in a week
Last edited:
Do we really need to keep getting jabbed? I find It a bit ridiculous how people are having to get jabbed twice a year. Does this mean the initial two jabs are useless now?
It’s up to you what you do, ultimately. I haven’t had any of the jabs at all. Depends how long ago you had the first 2 to know how useless they are now. The protection they offer you wains overtime and probably not as effective on the newer variants either.
I had my 2 jabs last March. I got the first one, but read about the side effects so put off getting the second one. I got the second one last March, a few months after the first. I don't think I want another one, although I'm unsure what the protocols will be or if they will change again.
Was just about to post this too as I just seen it on Twitter. Very worrying for those that have had the vaccine. A lady that I work with is currently off as she is vaccine injured after getting her booster recently so she can go on a holiday.
The study says:
The French study found the onset of symptoms within 11.38 days of being vaccinated, while the case study in Turkey has found symptoms appearing one day after vaccination.
Which would imply anyone who feels fine more than a couple of weeks after being vaccinated probably doesn't need to worry about keeling over with CJD.
The French study found the onset of symptoms within 11.38 days of being vaccinated, while the case study in Turkey has found symptoms appearing one day after vaccination.
Which would imply anyone who feels fine more than a couple of weeks after being vaccinated probably doesn't need to worry about keeling over with CJD.
It also concludes:
In order for CJD diagnosis to be associated with the vaccine, the cause-effect relationship between them must be revealed. Therefore, further studies are needed in this area.
This is a frightening read. My brother in law is having neurological problems after his vaccines too. He took a seizure while driving, only for a colleague being in the car and able to promptly take control of the vehicle or he would be dead. Absolutely frightening what is happening. Sickening people are still labelling us with concerns as conspiracy theorists.
Small world 
José Baselga (1959–2021), oncologist who revolutionized breast cancer treatment
José Baselga, oncologist who revolutionized breast cancer treatment, died Sunday of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease at his home in Spain at the age of 61.
www.legacy.com
Which begs the question, why didn't they wait for the further studies to be done before publishing?
Further studies require time and money . Same could be said of Astrazeneca and co pushing the vaccine. 
Some of us having been “begging the question” why the vaccines were made available under emergency use before any of these outcomes were found or ruled out, further investigations needed to happen for it to come to light. I guess some people have 0 tolerance for any negative or ill effects from the vaccine.
They might as well have said: "well, it might have been the vaccine, not sure though".
Oh wow. Hilarious isn’t it, so funny that people have went on to develop CJD after taking a vaccine that they believed was going to help them and protect everyone around them. So funny.They might as well have said: "well, it might have been the vaccine, not sure though".
The usual time frame goes like this:
Deny Deny Deny
Two years later
Actually there is a link.
-100% effective = actually it’s not
-stops transmission = actually it doesn’t
-NIH denied gain of function research= actually it’s true.
-NIH claim scientist Jesse is making false allegations that covid data was deleted. = truth “it wasn’t deleted just not made available”.
-No blood clots with AZ = guess there is
-No menstrual links = yes it’s possible
Sometimes you will have to wait 40 years to get to the real truth, but it always comes out in the end.
Why anyone would put their kids health in the hands of a pharmaceutical company that has been charged with fraud, deliberately misleading investigators and has been given the highest fines in history is beyond my comprehension. At least the baby mice are safe if you’re testing on kids.
Deny Deny Deny
Two years later
Actually there is a link.
-100% effective = actually it’s not
-stops transmission = actually it doesn’t
-NIH denied gain of function research= actually it’s true.
-NIH claim scientist Jesse is making false allegations that covid data was deleted. = truth “it wasn’t deleted just not made available”.
-No blood clots with AZ = guess there is
-No menstrual links = yes it’s possible
Sometimes you will have to wait 40 years to get to the real truth, but it always comes out in the end.
Why anyone would put their kids health in the hands of a pharmaceutical company that has been charged with fraud, deliberately misleading investigators and has been given the highest fines in history is beyond my comprehension. At least the baby mice are safe if you’re testing on kids.
Last edited:
- Status