It's gaslighting alright, but not by the people you are implying.I don't believe that is true. Who is 'they' and when did they say it? I think it's gaslighting.
It's gaslighting alright, but not by the people you are implying.I don't believe that is true. Who is 'they' and when did they say it? I think it's gaslighting.
They did insinuate only those at higher risk from the virus would be vaccinated https://www.gov.uk/government/publi...cination-advice-from-the-jcvi-2-december-2020
The first document is literally titled "Priority Groups for coronavirus (Covid-19) vaccination. There is nothing in either documents that supports the earlier suggestion that ...Matt Hancock 9th January:
Not 'just' or 'only', prioritised. As I said, gaslighting.... at the beginning of the vaccine narrative they said that it would just be for the vulnerable!?
He says cry freedom once the vulnerable have been vaccinated. Thats not happened.The first document is literally titled "Priority Groups for coronavirus (Covid-19) vaccination. There is nothing in either documents that supports the earlier suggestion that ...
Not 'just', prioritised. As I said, gaslighting.
There's nothing in it to say kids,pregnant women or young people would be vaccinated infact it's concerning that in Dec they advised against those groups as no animal testing had been done yet here we are just a few short months later ......The first document is literally titled "Priority Groups for coronavirus (Covid-19) vaccination. There is nothing in either documents that supports the earlier suggestion that ...
Not 'just', prioritised. As I said, gaslighting.
Where does it say that?Apparently teachers are being taught in school that from September, any child with a parent who doesn't test, jab or mask is an extremist/terrorist and their children must be reported to NSPCC/Social services etc. Last I checked, the jab and test was VOLUNTARY and there are exemptions for masks such as anxiety and distress. This is getting scary now, it really is becoming a cult
View attachment 577658
View attachment 577663
There's nothing in it to say kids,pregnant women or young people would be vaccinated infact it's concerning that in Dec they advised against those groups as no animal testing had been done yet here we are just a few short months later ......
Just to be clear, the claim was that the vaccination was intended only for the vulnerable. Again nothing you have said supports that as a true statement.He says cry freedom once the vulnerable have been vaccinated. Thats not happened.
I didn’t say it only for the vulnerable I said they implied that ?Just to be clear, the claim was that the vaccination was intended only for the vulnerable. Again nothing you have said supports that as a true statement.
I dont know what you mean, he clearly says cry freedom when the vulnerable have had their vaccination. I am not against vaccination, i just dont like the rhetoric in the media now. Both my husband and father have been vaccinated. Thats fine, i wouldnt dissuade anybody, but on the other hand, people who dont feel it is right for them should not be getting called refusenik idiots. The media are very obviously setting people against each other.Just to be clear, the claim was that the vaccination was intended only for the vulnerable. Again nothing you have said supports that as a true statement.
IT really doesn't imply anything of the kind unless you have a weird definition of the word vulnerable.I didn’t say it only for the vulnerable I said they implied that ?
You agreed that originally the vaccine was only intended for the 'vulnerable'. Only i.e. not for anybody else. Hancock's comments don't support that.I dont know what you mean, he clearly says cry freedom when the vulnerable have had their vaccination. I am not against vaccination, i just dont like the rhetoric in the media now. Both my husband and father have been vaccinated. Thats fine, i wouldnt dissuade anybody, but on the other hand, people who dont feel it is right for them should not be getting called refusenik idiots. The media are very obviously setting people against each other.
I didn’t say vulnerable?IT really doesn't imply anything of the kind unless you have a weird definition of the word vulnerable.
It was suggested the first phase should include:
View attachment 580697
The second phase could include:
View attachment 580700
Are all those 'vulnerable'?
I think its horrendous that anyone would think about treating a fellow human being like that. Is shocking. People should never feel forced into anything.I've seen this posted on Instagram which is quite concerning
I meant that at the beginning it had been made to sound like that on one of the earlier briefings that i had watched. Perhaps the government should make themselves more clear then. Regardless people should be able to make their own choices on both sides without feeling pressurised. Im not here to argue, but a lot of people are still unsure over the vaccines and the media bullying is cruel. The media is a seperate issue from what matt hancock did or didnt say, i know that. I was just making my point without writing another post.IT really doesn't imply anything of the kind unless you have a weird definition of the word vulnerable.
It was suggested the first phase should include:
View attachment 580697
The second phase could include:
View attachment 580700
Are all those 'vulnerable'?
You agreed that originally the vaccine was only intended for the 'vulnerable'. Only i.e. not for anybody else. Hancock's comments don't support that.
The media focus on people who don't want the vaccine is an entirely different point but it is wrong to say that originally it was not planned that they would be offered it.
She sounds completely unhinged.This is such a powerful speech. So important we start taking back control of our lives.
Yes they did imply that ,no matter what way you look at it https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/0/will-life-ever-return-normal-covid-vaccine-world-uk/I meant that at the beginning it had been made to sound like that on one of the earlier briefings that i had watched. Perhaps the government should make themselves more clear then. Regardless people should be able to make their own choices on both sides without feeling pressurised. Im not here to argue, but a lot of people are still unsure over the vaccines and the media bullying is cruel. The media is a seperate issue from what matt hancock did or didnt say, i know that. I was just making my point without writing another post.
That sounds great!! Any idea when he’s uploading it?Excellent article on the conservative women about vaccine coercion.
@DreamDolly hope you're ok! Got some amazing news! James Delingpole has just done a podcast with Reiner Fuellmich! He's uploading it soon! Can't wait!
All good here! You're always greatly missed when you're away! I think it'll be either tomorrow or Friday as he said it's this weeks guest and he usually uploads end of the week. I'll let you know as soon as he uploads it. Doubt it'll last long on YouTube.Hello peeps!! I’m back!!
I’ve literally had such a busy few days at the stables, with new horses arriving, and quite a few classes. I also took a hack out to the local forest, and had my new horse bolt on me because of the thunder!! Luckily, I managed to control him, but he’s a huge bugger, and it’s always the bigger ones who are literally scared of their own shadows!
I hope everyone’s ok, have I missed much?
That sounds great!! Any idea when he’s uploading it?
Aww thanks I’ve missed you guys too!All good here! You're always greatly missed when you're away! I think it'll be either tomorrow or Friday as he said it's this weeks guest and he usually uploads end of the week. I'll let you know as soon as he uploads it. Doubt it'll last long on YouTube.