Child labour laws must be urgently strengthened to stop young social media influencers from being exploited by their parents, MPs say

New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
  • MPs are urging the government to regulate the growing online influencer market
  • Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee called for tougher advertising rules
  • Concerns that child influencers could be exploited by adults to maximise profits
  • Last year, up to half of children said they watched vlogger or YouTube content
MPs have urged the government to regulate the influencer market amid concerns that child influencers could be overworked to maximise profits.


Ministers have also been told to boost advertising laws to force influencers to make it clear when advertising products - in order for children to develop 'media literacy' and prevent harmful ideas around body image from taking hold.

The report by the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) Committee says child labour regulations should be brought up to date to reflect the growth of child influencers.

'Child viewers, who are still developing digital literacy, are in particular danger in an environment where not everything is always as it seems,' said Tory MP Julian Knight, the chairman of the committee.

'There is a woeful lack of protection for young influencers who often spend long hours producing financially lucrative content at the direction of others.'

He added that 'inaction' had left regulations behind the times in a digital world, and that was particularly concerning when it came to the protection of children.

According to Ofcom, last year up to half of all children said they watched vlogger or YouTube influencer content and 'kidfluencers' can earn as much as £100,000 per month.

Successful child influencers in Britain include 14-year-old Tiana Wilson from Nottingham, who has 11.4million Youtube subscribers, and football expert Lorenzo Greer, 13, with 1.7million followers. There is nothing to suggest these children have been exploited, The Times reports.

In the US, 11-year-old toy tester Ryan Kaji has emerged as a phenomenally successful influencer, with 32 million subscribers and projected earnings of almost $30 million.

The committee urged the Government to conduct a study into the influencer industry so it can be properly regulated as it grows - as well as manage rules around pay standards and practice, and advertising regulators be given more power to close influencer loopholes.

They also called for an official code of conduct for influencer marketing to be commissioned.

Mr Knight said: 'The rise of influencer culture online has brought significant new opportunities for those working in the creative industries and a boost to the UK economy.

'However, as is so often the case where social media is involved, if you dig below the shiny surface of what you see on screen you will discover an altogether murkier world where both the influencers and their followers are at risk of exploitation and harm online.'

The committee's report said it had heard concerns during its inquiry that some children within the influencer economy were being used by parents and family members - who often manage their online accounts - who were seeking to capitalise on the lucrative online market.

'The explosion in influencer activity has left the authorities playing catch-up and exposed the impotence of advertising rules and employment protections designed for a time before social media was the all-encompassing behemoth it has become today,' Mr Knight said.

'This report has held a mirror up to the problems which beset the industry, where for too long it has been a case of lights, camera, inaction.


'It is now up to the Government to reshape the rules to keep pace with the changing digital landscape and ensure proper protections for all.'

---
The times

----
Posting this in one thread so we can chat about it here together rather than in all the individual threads.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Haha
Reactions: 273
The Saccone Jolys must be shitting themselves!
Let’s hope something gets done!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 161
The Saccone Jolys must be shitting themselves!
Let’s hope something gets done!
I think it’s not enough to look at children’s rights from a labour angle, what about the effects on their mental and physical health after living out their formative years so publicly?
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 132

Yel

Moderator
No tit 🙄, we've been saying this for years while the media and influencers have gone on about tattle being the worst site on the internet. I always said they should be the ones worried about regulators catching up with their murky ways. Although that'll probably still be a long way off.

DCMS Committee Chairman Julian Knight said: "If you dig below the shiny surface of what you see on screen you will discover an altogether murkier world, where both the influencers and their followers are at risk of exploitation and harm online."

Mr Knight continued: "The explosion in influencer activity has left the authorities playing catch-up, and exposed the impotence of advertising rules and employment protections designed for a time before social media was the all-encompassing behemoth it has become today.

"This report has held a mirror up to the problems which beset the industry, where for too long it has been a case of lights, camera, inaction.

"It is now up to the Government to reshape the rules to keep pace with the changing digital landscape and ensure proper protections for all."

The Competition and Markets Authority told the inquiry that influencer compliance rates with UK advertising regulations are still unacceptably low.
In 2020, a monitoring exercise by the ASA found that just 35% of 24,000 marketing posts on the Instagram accounts of 122 UK-based influencers were clearly labelled as adverts..
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 80
I think this could be a really important and significant step (that's assuming it leads to changes in the law). It's easy to see how exploitative some social media/influencer channels can be, and it's a market that's developed so rapidly that legislation just hasn't caught up yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37
Took them long enough.

The articles appear to be centred around "child influencers" and "young social media stars". It needs to be clear that this extends to "children of parent influencers" who aren't marketed as stars in their own right per se, and ANY child being exploited online.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 129
I'd be really interested to see some kind of ruling that the money earned by these children should go into accounts for them that their parents cannot touch. Might change a lot of parent's attitudes toward kidfluencers...
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 88
Took them long enough.

The articles appear to be centred around "child influencers" and "young social media stars". It needs to be clear that this extends to "children of parent influencers" who aren't marketed as stars in their own right per se, any ANY child being exploited online.
Absolutely! The suggestion here is that children who CHOSE to become influencers are being worked too hard. The biggest problem we are seeing are parents who CHOSE to become influencers or have a presence which invariably makes them one, using their children for content, engagement and ultimately cash cows.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 51
The Saccone Jolys must be shitting themselves!
Let’s hope something gets done!
Was talking to my (adult) daughter about them just this morning and she was horrified! This legislation is long overdue to protect vulnerable kids from being exploited by foul, influencer poncing-parent types🤢
 
  • Like
Reactions: 32
I honestly don't think any Child can fully comprehend what this all means and cannot give proper consent to be an "INFLUENCER".

A child needs to have a childhood for as long as possible, they do not need to be on the Internet through some of their most awkward times of life.

I challenge anyone to say they don't have things they are embarrassed about from their childhoods that haunts them till this day and then to compound that with it being on the Internet for the whole world to see.

Nope... kids must be kids. Discover themselves and mostly have fun.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 44
A child (especially a baby or a toddler) or someone who is unable to understand/verbalise their thoughts/feelings, should absolutely NOT be plastered all over the Internet, in books etc (and let's be honest, used for content) by their parents or guardian.

About time!
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 34
Let's also see some rigour around things like broadcasting children's medical conditions & details, personal information (home address, school - or enough clues to easily work them out) etc.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 36

Yel

Moderator
Took them long enough.

The articles appear to be centred around "child influencers" and "young social media stars". It needs to be clear that this extends to "children of parent influencers" who aren't marketed as stars in their own right per se, and ANY child being exploited online.
Agreed, the ryan's toy reviews types are the thin end of the wedge.

All of the children that have been turned into content in order to generate money for the parents need to be protected. From mrs hinch using her children to sell child products and the inghams home schooling their kids in order to generate daily vlogs. For many of these people the children is the content.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 46
I'd be really interested to see some kind of ruling that the money earned by these children should go into accounts for them that their parents cannot touch. Might change a lot of parent's attitudes toward kidfluencers...
It reminds me of the days when child actors in Hollywood would sometimes have their earnings stolen by their parents.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 15
Would this apply to children used in videos without their consent ? so many influencers use their kids for content ,views ie their income . I think it is dreadful personally
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30
Great news and whilst maybe not the direct reason for these new laws I think Tattle will have definitely played a part in bringing these issues to the attention of people. Great work everyone :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18
I 100% believe that in 20 - 30 years time people will look back at this 'era' of internet use and wonder what the actual duck was going on and how people couldn't see the blatant exploitation and damage being done to kids and teenagers on social media. This is a great step towards changing for the better when it comes to young people.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 68