So hypocritical...
I also kind of have a feeling she sent that message to herself![Rolling on the floor laughing :rofl: š¤£](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f923.png)
I also kind of have a feeling she sent that message to herself
![Rolling on the floor laughing :rofl: š¤£](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f923.png)
I donāt know how people write this kind of tit with a serious faceThat last sentence. Pot, kettle...
I just don't get why she is thinking that white non-disabled people are saying that? I haven't seen that anywhere on her posts today, or have I missed something?White people are not some bleeping monolith. If we're going to play hierarchy one-upmanship, Cathy forgets she is a white middle class woman and having a disability or mixed race children does not negate that.
What pisses me off about the marginalisation hierarchy these people like to bleat on about is that they never factor in just how much 'privilege' someone has coming from a loving, stable and supportive family, whatever that family looks like. From what's she said in the past, her parents are amazing and supportive. I really don't think this is talked about enough by Cathy et. al because it's not something you can quickly judge from looking at a person. They just want to put people in intersectional boxes immediately from someone's appearance i.e. White, female, non disabled = uber privileged, with absolutely NO idea what that person has been through in the past.White people are not some bleeping monolith. If we're going to play hierarchy one-upmanship, Cathy forgets she is a white middle class woman and having a disability or mixed race children does not negate that.
Absolutely. These people never mention this or social class in their rants about intersectionality, because then they'd have to acknowledge they're probably much higher up the hierarchy than they'd like to admit. I feel like the only people we don't ever hear from are poor white women.What pisses me off about the marginalisation hierarchy these people like to bleat on about is that they never factor in just how much 'privilege' someone has coming from a loving, stable and supportive family, whatever that family looks like. From what's she said in the past, her parents are amazing and supportive. I really don't think this is talked about enough by Cathy et. al because it's not something you can quickly judge from looking at a person. They just want to put people in intersectional boxes immediately from someone's appearance i.e. White, female, non disabled = uber privileged, with absolutely NO idea what that person has been through in the past.
I'm also now wondering if she just shares women of colour's Instagram/posts, simply because they are women of colour - does she know what their past transgressions may be or their actual beliefs. Is she simply trying to amplify such voices to appear an ally without thinking critically about what they're saying. She's referred to Africa Brooke a few times. Africa's viewpoint and teachings, as it were, go completely against what she says and believes - unsurprisingly, I love Africa. I believe she's shared Stephanie Yeboah in the past as well, who has posted anti-Semitic tweets historically.
Exactly like the poor white woman in my clinic today who has to make a choice between hearing her home and relying on a food bank to eat or to do shopping and have a freezing house. I think this woman has had more issues in her life than poor freelance writer/Instagram influencer cathy.Absolutely. These people never mention this or social class in their rants about intersectionality, because then they'd have to acknowledge they're probably much higher up the hierarchy than they'd like to admit. I feel like the only people we don't ever hear from are poor white women.