It's a very long time since I studied criminal law, but IIRC the answer is no. If you do something intentionally or recklessly you are equally culpable.Genuinely: if you throw something in someone’s general direction, is it a defence to say you didn’t mean to hit them?
ETA: (off topic but the Brown case they mention is a case and a half - indelible on my brain
Battery / common assault
Section 39 Criminal Justice Act 1988 (CJA 1988)
Common assault is an act by which a person intentionally or recklessly causes another to suffer or apprehend immediate unlawful violence. Battery is committed by the intentional or reckless application of unlawful force to another person. These are two separate offences, placed on a statutory footing by section 39 CJA 1988. Where battery is selected it should be charged as “assault by beating”: DPP v Taylor and Little [1992] Q.B. 645.
Where the offence amounts to domestic abuse, prosecutors should have regard to section 39A CJA 1988 which extends the usual summary time limit in certain circumstances. For further information see the Domestic Abuse prosecution guidance.
Consent is a defence to battery (see Brown, below). Reasonable punishment is a common law defence to battery in England, confined to battery by section 58 Children Act 2004. It is not a defence in Wales: Children (Abolition of Defence of Reasonable Punishment) (Wales) Act 2020. Educational establishments may not give corporal punishment to children: section 548 Education Act 1996 (but may use reasonable force for specified reasons including preventing an offence: section 93 Education and Inspections Act 2006.
Last edited: