Yet it’s been okay for Heidi Klum, Mel B, JLo, Alicia Silverstone, Mariah Carey or Kim K to pose naked in ADs, IG, or books in their 40s+?
Let Britney live. She looks incredible for 40.
Let Britney live. She looks incredible for 40.
Fair comment, she's certainly not the only one doing it - but why not raise the bar a little?Yet it’s been okay for Heidi Klum, Mel B, JLo, Alicia Silverstone, Mariah Carey or Kim K to pose naked in ADs, IG, or books in their 40s+?
Let Britney live. She looks incredible for 40.
It isn't, that's not the point.I think she’s raised the bar enough through out her career hasn’t she? Seriously how is it effecting anyones day if she WANTS to post a few sexy pictures?
The thing is that none of us are free from ageing, and the idea is to do it with dignity and grace. 40 is just too old for any of us to keep getting our bits out!She’s feeling freer than ever she looks unreal and I’m sure most would rather see her like this than how she was for the past almost 14 years seriously unhappy living in trauma and constant fear. I’m just soooo happy to see her living her best life whatever that looks like.
Who actually hates her though? Wanting her to change her ways and act in a more dignified and respectful manner isn't "hating" her. A 40-year-old behaving like a teenage rebel just isn't a good look for anyone.well everyone’s entitled to their own opinions of course. I just do not like how Britney Is forever been slandered for just about everything she does especially her insta posts whether they be her posting almost nude pictures or videos of her dancing. Sure she’s 40 but that’s still young and she looks fantastic. Personally I think she knows exactly what she’s doing and she’s just basically giving the middle finger to all the haters whilst feeling herself.
I didn't say it was OK for them to do it. Madonna still posing for nudes at 61 is horrendous! Britney converted to Roman Catholicism 6 months ago, and I'd like to think her lifestyle might reflect that - not a Joe Biden type of Catholicism, where it's all about show!What if she doesn’t want to change her ways? Why should she? she’s 40 and fabulous. Why can everyone else who by the way many are older than her pose naked do sexualised pics and that’s ok for them to do it? But when Britney does it it’s ‘not a good look’.
Personally I think it’s fine for people to express that they feel the pics are tacky. But I think what most here (and on Twitter) are pushing back on is that underlying suggestion that she’s out of control/crazy/having a crisis/is failing since the conservatorship ended/was better off in it. That’s what’s between the lines in many criticisms I’ve seen.I don’t like this narrative that because she was in a conservatorship people can’t say anything even slightly negative about her.
She can post whatever the hell she wants, but people can also pass judgment on those pics.
Yes other women post naked pics too but i also think they are tacky for doing it, just look at madonna and her cringe AF pics, at a certain age this tit is embarrassing.
And just because i said i don’t think those pics are tasteful doesn’t mean I don’t love her, because i do still want the best for her.
She's not just doing it privately though, she wants EVERYONE to see her!She could go naked on the cover of rolling stone and it would be acceptable and probably even celebrated. It seems to irk people that she’s doing it by herself (not meaning you)
True - we don't have an automatic right to know more than she wants to tell us. I actually don't think the nudity has much to do with mental health, it's just the sort of person she is.How are we judging someone’s mental health going off social media posts . I think we all know Britney’s got her troubles mainly PTSD but really we don’t know and she’s got ever right to keep her mh troubles private.