At the moment there’s a fair bit of evidence for Schofield though, and repeated with different people. He also did an awful lot of manipulation and evasion and his colleagues haven’t a good word to say of him. We still don’t really know what is going on here yet, although it does admittedly look dodgy.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
What I’m still trying to get my head around was, why the mum didn’t go the police instead of the paper .
Sun said two concerned parents, thought it was just the mother.
it’s so confusing my head hurts
Sun said two concerned parents, thought it was just the mother.
it’s so confusing my head hurts
I have friends who do webcam work and have regulars who tip them a lot of money. My thoughts are that HE is a sugar daddy for this young person and the young person has been spending the money on drugs. The mum has found out HE is the one providing the money for the drugs and is so stressed out with her child being a drug addict that she's gone to the papers to try and cut off the funds for the drugs, that's why she doesn't want paying. He might not have known their age, he may very well have. The young person is probably denying it because they don't want to lose their payouts.
I just don’t see this myself:
- Comments were already restricted on his Insta
- There’s plenty of photos of him elsewhere on the internet
- His Twitter profile is still active and is not restricting replies
I don’t think it’s a coincidence that the allegations of “sliding into DMs” are mainly focused around Instagram - where it’s generally easier to perv over young men (if you’re that way inclined) than on Twitter where most people don’t post many pictures of themselves.
This is a very likely scenario, but what a mess.
He's on crack, he's got 35p and a lighter in his back pocket.He's got £35k in his back pocket!
Well, exactly.So now the young person has come forward to say nothing illegal happened everyone on sm who was convinced it was HE and he is a wrong un is going with the he paid them off angle? because they didn't like the outcome
It's funny that people think they must have been paid off to get a lawyer.
Probably what happened is 1 of
- They put 'media lawyer' into Google and found a firm (perhaps they checked out who represented Colleen Rooney or some other high profile case) and then contacted them.
- The BBC got in contact for their investigation, their lawyers probably said 'we won't talk to you unless you have a lawyer, here's a list of firms you could ask to represent you
Probably what happened is 1 of
- They put 'media lawyer' into Google and found a firm (perhaps they checked out who represented Colleen Rooney or some other high profile case) and then contacted them.
- The BBC got in contact for their investigation, their lawyers probably said 'we won't talk to you unless you have a lawyer, here's a list of firms you could ask to represent you
I’m watching Sky and then GBN for the deep delve at 9pm
The Sun say complaint was from both parents
I think the BBC got spooked today and sent the same message to all news media outlets
Controlled ops
The Sun say complaint was from both parents
I think the BBC got spooked today and sent the same message to all news media outlets
Controlled ops
Who’s to say the lawyers haven’t been paid for by HE? 
What a mess either way
What a mess either way
I no longer think poor mother. I think this is pretty sick to go against your child like this, even if it’s 100% true. In fact, especially if it’s true… you e got a child who has drug problems and so potentially MH problems and you pull this tit? I would never ever speak to her ever again. She’d be dead to me. The person is 20 and entitled to make their own decisions, even if the mother doesn’t agree.So HE may well be back on at 10
All joking aside it seems like the young male is back tracking, maybe because he could end up in trouble, the poor mother must be climbing the walls.
The young person has been very badly used, especially by the Sun who ignored their statement on Friday saying it’s not true.
I seriously question the mother here. It’s felt dodgy all along and there’s details that have never added up. We’re almost certainly missing a big piece of the puzzle and the mother feels a likely reason why.So HE may well be back on at 10
All joking aside it seems like the young male is back tracking, maybe because he could also end up in trouble. The poor mother must be climbing the walls.
Well that was a plot twist we weren't expecting!
God knows, but they say they have the evidence is the latest on Sky at mo.
Don't see why the BBC would do that? The presenter maybe. The BBC wouldn't be dragged throuh a court case anymore than say Tesco would be if an employee of theirs did the same.
It does seem strange though unless the mother has completely the wrong end of the stick. As a parent though, my first port of call would be the police if Inthought something wrong/illegal was going on NOT the employer or press.
I’m confused as this story has changed so much
The police aren’t investigating but assessing. That sounds a bit like pedantics!
The denial by the alleged victim why now why not when this story first came out? It looks like they’ve been silenced but I could be wrong,
I don’t think this is the last of the story it doesn’t add up.
The police aren’t investigating but assessing. That sounds a bit like pedantics!
The denial by the alleged victim why now why not when this story first came out? It looks like they’ve been silenced but I could be wrong,
I don’t think this is the last of the story it doesn’t add up.
- Status