Notice
Thread ordered by most liked posts - View normal thread.

jookey

Member
If it's not true, why the suspension? The Sun must've made the BBC aware of the evidence they have, and possibly shared it with them. As someone said earlier, why did the young person wait until now to say it's not true? Why let so many people be thrown under the bus over the last 72 hours?
Why would a supposed caring mother very concerned about drug use tell such lies? Why hasn't Huw made a statement as no one elses name is being bandied about anymore? None of it makes any sense!

ETA: Agree with poster who said this could be a distraction. But why ruin the career of a much beloved news anchor? I just don't get it.
Apparently the young person told The Sun via whatsapp on Friday evening that it’s all ‘rubbish.’
 
  • Sad
  • Like
Reactions: 4

ella1979

VIP Member
Alright, the HMRC 😂
I think “gifts” within a “loving” relationship (if it could ever be classed as such 😂) are tax free unless the person dies within a certain period of time

I think it’s gifts which help the relationship so a sugar daddy gifting a girlfriend money for nails and upkeep of appearance for example
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 4

pommobear

VIP Member
The mother, The Sun, The BBC, the presenter, the young person.

People are desperately searching for a simple story with a villain they can bay for the blood of.

It looks messy, complex and as if a number of individuals made mistakes they tont want to take any responsibility for.

Why do we find it so hard to reserve our judgment, speculation and vitriol even when we know we lack facts?
Thank you, you said this much more eloquently than I did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4

catdod5678

New member
OF is a home grown UK tech success story! No problem with anyone using that to make income if they pay tax!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3

Redgirl81

VIP Member
You have no way of knowing if the BBC handled this correctly or not. The BBC have have said they started an investigation back in May. If, as the child is saying, there is nothing untoward going on, then the BBC had nothing to address.

We are in a he said/she said scenario here and everyone is choosing to believe what they want to believe based on here say with no solid evidence.
The BBC mustn’t of handled it correctly because he wasn’t suspended pending investigation in May, he carried on doing his presenting and was allowed to go to awards etc.. and also carried on sending money after the reports was made.. so he obv wasn’t investigated properly or he just wasn’t arsed that the mother had put a complaint in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3

House of Tea

VIP Member
I think because people are cynical about the Schofield issue, there is always going to be questions about cover ups from now on. It was largely the “work” of social media and sites like this one that kept the momentum going on PS. Everyone else was busy keeping the story suppressed.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 3