That was Karen Matthews, Shannon was her daughter.Is Shannon Matthew’s still in prison….?
Had to clarify, it's already a minefield in here, we don't need to mix up perpetrator and victim.
Last edited:
That was Karen Matthews, Shannon was her daughter.Is Shannon Matthew’s still in prison….?
My narrsasist dad told his side of the family I was a drug addict and schizophrenic. Never touch a drug in my life and I might be a bit of a rocket but a schizophrenicOnly the parents have said that.
You hold The Sun in much higher regard than most of the British public.That being said, The Sun must have been provided with sufficient evidence to run this story
My thoughts exactlyMy narrsasist dad told his side of the family I was a drug addict and schizophrenic. Never touch a drug in my life and I might be a bit of a rocket but a schizophrenicwouldn’t be the first time a parent spoke crap for their own gain
Right?! The Sun, that well known beacon of truth and integrity.You hold The Sun in much higher regard than most of the British public.
Even if the sun don't pay her, plenty of others will be lining upThe Sun kept saying she received no money for the story?
Today was the day Boris had till 4pm to hand over his phone. That story has been completely buried by the bbc presenter story. A cynic might think think this story was a distraction. Oh and colour me surprised Boris didn’t hand over the phone.Post leveson even if they have the photos of individual in his pants on the sofa (of which I’m a bit doubtful) is this public interest?
I’ve being reading about how low on funds the Murdoch press are after the Fox News payout and the talk tv bailout. Would they risk it all on this? I’m not sure. The government want bbc fee gone and will push for an expose, but I think they might hold off.
I don’t read the sun at all but nowadays stories like this can only be published with evidence and a legal team, someone on this morning said something along this. So IF they saw evidence, then who’s lying?I’m hoping I am wrong but I still believe whatever presenter it is, has done something inappropriate, maybe the sun will have evidence who knows, can’t see why the accused would say now it was all rit and not in May when initial complaint went into the BBC.. Let’s hoping we get actual evidence
What a vile thing to say, that doesn’t make the parents narcissistic and there‘s nothing to say they took payment, the opposite in fact.I am very very proud to say I am not narcissistic enough that I would ever sell my child to the vultures that are the gutter press against their express permission. No matter what.
These parents have just ducked up their child far more than any drugs could with the lack of trust that this would have caused. It’s disgusting.
Here’s a bit of light reading while you‘re gone ENJOY CARIAD!Makes note to comeback to these threads in a year’s time. Thread number 45 I am guessing.
Except that, AGAIN, it hasn't been confirmed it is HE.It's still very intriguing that there was a connection/relationship between HE and the 20 year old, whether it was, as is now claimed by the 20 year old, not inappropriate or illegal.
What sort of relationship was it, how did it start and why?
Absolute tit-stirrer. I can't see them going any further with this story today.So Liz Kershaw was full of rit
ThirdedMy thoughts exactly