Hahooha
Member
Why not tonight!! Why do I have have to wait till tomorrowJeremy Kyle just said further allegations on the presenters conduct in tomorrow's news
Why not tonight!! Why do I have have to wait till tomorrowJeremy Kyle just said further allegations on the presenters conduct in tomorrow's news
the ultimate duck you allImagine if HE presents the 6 news.
Sat there in his tie "hello fuckers..."
Didn't someone observe that based on the Depp trial with the Sun they have a lot of room to manoeuvre in these situations if they reasonably believe/conclude it's true or something?That was my thinking too. They don’t want a lawsuit.
Exactly this!The more you think about this, the more it makes sense that it’s getting swept under the rug.
This is a man that has been involved in one of the biggest events in decades (queens death) and I also assume that he is probably close-ish to the royal family. They don’t want this coming out.
For what it’s worth, I don’t believe HE is a paedophile. I don’t even believe that he’s done anything illegal. I do believe he’s been incredibly stupid however and his actions have caused lots of other male presenters to come under scrutiny. I do think some responsibility needs to be taken for that.
I also don’t believe they’ve paid anyone off. I think his young person has never wanted this to come out. The mother has seen her child turn to drugs and looking for someone to blame.
The problem is that it appears the two did have some sort of relationship because the young person hasn't denied itSurely if there was no truth to this, Huw would've come out with a statement such as "I am aware that xyzzy have made allegations against me in relation to xyzzy, I can confirm that there is no truth to these accusations and I have instructed my lawyers to do XYZ"
the silence speaks louder, no ?
The point is that Johnny Depp v The Sun was not about whether he was an abuser or not, it was whether The Sun had a reasonable expectation that he was based on the information they had at the time they printed the article. The US trial was a different issue as that was about whether he had abused Amber Heard and it was clear to any reasonable person that followed the trial that Amber was the abuser.They won but was later discredited in the American case that I followed. Sorry I didn’t follow the sun trial as they lie anyways regardless.
I didn’t say much tbh I just said I think it’s HE and then I had multiple people saying I’m going to get sued for this and that I was like … ok good luck with that 🫡Omg what did you say?! Let me guess, the person leading the lawsuit is Jeremy Vine
As for HE liking those tweets, I’d say that’s a really stupid move. If he’s indeed ‘the presenter’ then he must have full confidence that The Sun aren’t waiting in the wings ready to drop incriminating evidence against him. If he’s not the accused, then he’s inadvertently sided with the accused which won’t work in his favour if it turns out this young man is being paid off or that there’s still damning evidence yet to be made public.
There is some unconscious bias going on hereThe crackhead’s mum’s inverted snob friend
I read the photo (if real) is from someone else who has had paid ‘interactions’ with him. The account on twitter which initially posted it said this.So where did the picture of HE’s bare arse come from if this is all hogwash?
If that was the case surely he would have done it days ago.The deleted IG makes me wonder if he thought that it would delete evidence of him allegedly messaging other young people
How many will be wanting that as their epitaph when the time comes?!Phrase of 2023:
Unwise but not illegal
No, it's the young person claiming it's rubbish.So the presenter claims it’s rubbish. But the sun states they have seen evidence and have done nothing wrong in publishing what they did, it’s now upto the bbc to decide.