BBC Presenter Scandal #3

Notice
Thread ordered by most liked posts - View normal thread.
ABiggerBoat

ABiggerBoat

Member
SendReceive said:
I get that, but why only Instagram but not Twitter? That doesn’t make sense to me, unless deleting the Instagram account anonymises some spicy DMs that you had exchanged with people… and that was your preferred medium for exchanging said spicy DMs…I’m
Click to expand...
I really don’t know, I did wonder if it was something to do with him being inundated with DM’s.

But, really, I just wanted to say that I can’t cope with your profile pic 🤣
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 5
Helena-botham-farter

Helena-botham-farter

VIP Member
duggee_hug said:
What has bothered me about this situation is that these older, adult celebrities are sexually exploring with barely legal teenagers and getting away with it because they’ve just turned of a legal age. It’s like they’re picking them fresh off the shelf, they don’t want to pull a Saville if they get caught so they get right close to what is deemed as legal in the hopes they’ll get away with it. To quote what Scofe said not too long ago, it was ‘unwise but not illegal’ - it was just barely legal! And actually there are still questions around that ‘legal’ aspect, that have gone unanswered! But this seems to be what we are seeing now, and this is what is upsetting the public. They’re being clever with their sleezy, almost-predatory ways.
Click to expand...
That's what I thought, imagine what they're searching for to find the people who 'look' young :sick:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
C

catdod5678

New member
BBC person in focus has a family and has previously been open about their mental health … can’t imagine what they and their family must be going through right now if indeed nothing illegal has taken place

saw another person of internet interest has gone to the police about malicious assertions … this scenario is going to be a libel lawyers wet dream
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
L

L3moning

VIP Member
Harrigan said:
It’s up to the Sun to show any evidence to support their story if not it will only confirm to some people it cannot be described as a newspaper.

GB news usually do the next day paper front pages I think around 10.30 not sure but will be interesting to see what the headlines are.
Click to expand...
Yeah, the front pages are usually revealed between 10 and 10:30, although it sometimes depends, and sometimes some papers don't. It's not unheard of for some papers' "first edition" to be a dummy front page to hide what they're actual headline is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
louisababe

louisababe

Chatty Member
I’m hoping I am wrong but I still believe whatever presenter it is, has done something inappropriate, maybe the sun will have evidence who knows, can’t see why the accused would say now it was all shite and not in May when initial complaint went into the BBC.. Let’s hoping we get actual evidence
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
T

tcaketess

Active member
explodeyourgoss said:
So Vanessa is raising questions about who is paying for this young person's expensive lawyer. This is the same Vanessa who supported Schofield, the very man who has been helping with his victim's legal fees! So she will defend an ITV perp but not a BBC one. Vile.

Vanessa on TalkTV - Twitter
Click to expand...
She’s just bitter about the BBC because they offloaded her early breakfast radio slot to someone younger
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
House of Tea

House of Tea

VIP Member
Gym&Tonic said:
What has being Welsh got to do with it? He isn’t a hero to Wales that I’m aware of. He’s not even my favourite newsreader (that would be Clive) At the moment we don’t have any real evidence to support him having done anything wrong. He may have done. Time will tell. The Sun shouldn’t have run the story without checking the facts first. They have a long history of being total cunts. There is also a ton of evidence about Schofield. We’ve known about him on here for three years. Before any of this I’d never heard anything negative about HE.
Click to expand...
It’s just when I think of your posts they are always about your lust for Hancock, and your hatred for Scofield, who you have gone hard on in the past (for good reason but you were particularly vociferous on PS). Yet most of your posts last few days have jumped on the don’t believe it of HE, to palpable relief that this new twist has emerged. And yet, it looks like he is someone who has deployed the same MO as PS, and yet he seems to be getting, not a pass, but a more benign approach from you. So, I asked if you were Welsh, and washe was a Welsh hero, and that would explain the disparity of approach.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5