The video was very concise and broke down the irrational nature of her arguments and how manipulative she can be, but these male youtubers who speak about this stuff never sit right with me. Or at least the people who comment on their videos - I was just reading through and one guy has pretty much said that women are only there to sell their bodies and it’s in their nature, another is basically disgusted that there’s such a thing as vaginal rejuvenation surgery because that means you’ll never know if she’s been sleeping around and she’s basically pretending.
A lot of them are anti-feminist and incels. I agree that it’s good that they are calling her out, but I can’t help but think it comes from a different place than if they were simply outing her as a scammer, I get the vibe that a lot of them dislike women and that’s the real reason they are outing her tactics.
It’s the opposite end of the spectrum to Anna, I guess I hope more people start coming forward from a more balanced perspective and focus on her scamming side more than just picking her apart for being a gold digger (although it’s still valid).
A lot of them are anti-feminist and incels. I agree that it’s good that they are calling her out, but I can’t help but think it comes from a different place than if they were simply outing her as a scammer, I get the vibe that a lot of them dislike women and that’s the real reason they are outing her tactics.
It’s the opposite end of the spectrum to Anna, I guess I hope more people start coming forward from a more balanced perspective and focus on her scamming side more than just picking her apart for being a gold digger (although it’s still valid).
). I've read them call women everything from 'slime holes' to 'nature's eugenicists' -- along with words like cock carousel and hitting a wall when we turn 30 lol. They revere the whole 1950s stay at home wife set up as the holy grail solution. I understand the importance of real motherhood, and that a lot of the issues deeply rooted in individuals as they age and society as a whole stem from their childhood and family core/values, which impact their inner world the most at such a young and vulnerable age. However, as a woman, I don't know how to explain to any of these men why motherhood and homemaking is still not a fair 50/50 split nor is it fulfilling for all women if that is all they get to do with their lives. They cannot speak on our behalf and their understanding of this issue ends at the point that these issues are resolved for them. Meaning, they want women to not expect them to be good looking, tall, rich/financially comfortable, a provider, successful, etc. They emphasize that the only requirement should be that they're a nice man who can love you kindof otherwise you're just a heartless, shallow gold-digger or hypergamous witch.
) said previously. I'm not against "gold-digging" or hypergamy in the sense that a woman should be able to choose and strive for the best option she is able to. This whole idea that a woman who is truly virtuous chooses the beggar rather than the billionaire (extreme example to illustrate my point) is both ridiculous and misogynistic. It's based on some ridiculous idea that the love presented by the "weaker" party - whether that be the man that's not rich, not good looking, not popular, etc. is somehow pure and true whereas the love presented by the "strong" party -- the one who is rich or powerful or good looking -- is inherently bad and laced with ulterior motives. Being low maintenance and asking for nothing from a man besides that he's nice and treats you nicely is not virtuous, it's taking your self worth and stomping it to death. I'm not saying every woman should only settle for a millionaire/billionaire as if that will solve everything (which is what I dislike about Anna and these other "affluence" gurus), I'm saying that being nice and getting treated with basic respect and love are the absolute bare bones requirements of any relationship. It's not wrong for a woman to demand more.
