I do wonder if they’re having to give less info about the background of cases because there’s so much ‘gang’ war stuff happening in Luton.
Me too! He seemed really surprised by it. But the phone data definitely suggested his involvement in some way.I was quite convinced by O’Dells denials. But there was no explanation why his balaclava would be there
I wondered if it was because of potential retribution that we never heard the victim's full name, just 'Malik'. Am I right in thinking we usually would for this type of crime? It's not even stated in online reporting of the case.I do wonder if they’re having to give less info about the background of cases because there’s so much ‘gang’ war stuff happening in Luton.
Agreed - drab over insightfulNot worth a one off episode really. Last few were better.
Or don't read the thread if you haven't watched it , I think it's fair for people to talk without spoilers when something has aired on mainstreamMaybe put this behind a spoiler for those that haven’t watched it yet?
I had watched it thanksOr don't read the thread if you haven't watched it , I think it's fair for people to talk without spoilers when something has aired on mainstream
I just mean in general , it's not a spoiler if the show has airedI had watched it thanks