To be fair, Rachel's been looking older than her age essentially since she had Lea, so for a few years while she was still vegan. I'm sure we can find plenty of non vegans, like, say J. Lo, who look amazing and are older than Rachel.Her word/integrity is not to be trusted. She is an untrustworthy grifter.
I also don't get now turning Lea's whole birth into a new trauma to mull over. Classic Rakel. Hindsight is 20/20 but damn she is imploding over Lea's birth story. Her BFF Olivia is like the expert bathtub birther, so now Rachel's outlook on the whole experience with Lea is now condemning the hospital for making her feel any type of way that didn't jibe with her signs and intuition from the moon.
I’m going there. Who done it better?
Alicia Silverstone 46 years old unhealthy non ancestral, seed oil drinker, cult leader vegan.
Rakel Brathen 34 years old: Liver pate, steak and ancestral processed cheese.
Moral of the story, Alicia in all her unhealthy unnourishment looks more youthful in the face at damn near 50 than Rakel at a young 34.
I think it is not a fair comparison: Rachel is using a filter for this selfie, and Alicia isn't - she didn't even take and manipulate this photo herself.I’m going there. Who done it better?
Alicia Silverstone 46 years old unhealthy non ancestral, seed oil drinker, cult leader vegan.
Rakel Brathen 34 years old: Liver pate, steak and ancestral processed cheese.
Moral of the story, Alicia in all her unhealthy unnourishment looks more youthful in the face at damn near 50 than Rakel at a young 34.
Excellent question and I've also no idea. She's not even a nice person. She openly mocks people and bullies them. Who even knows why she still has a loyal following when she's only loyal to herself.What bothers me most is that she has so many follower and no matter what bs she is up to, her Fans defend her and take every word from her like she is the Dalai Lama. Yogagirl doesn't even do Yoga anymore. Why are they all that blind?
True. as well they both live in sunny climates. And Rachel shriveled like a raisin. And yes her ugly bully personality contributes to her mug.To be fair, Rachel's been looking older than her age essentially since she had Lea, so for a few years while she was still vegan. I'm sure we can find plenty of non vegans, like, say J. Lo, who look amazing and are older than Rachel.
Personally, I think it's Rachel's ugly heart making its way out to her face, but that's just my theory
Agree, I like truth and realness as well so I much prefer this site to Rachel’s page. The truth is in short supply with her and other influensters.Happy 2023 everyone.
Although it feels a bit weird to be on a gossip site ,I actually find it does help me get better insight into humans and people's opinions are on here often way more actually authentic then the persona she puts on. So if the truth is ugly, and hilarious, I'll take it.
More tattling ployzzzz you funny mo'fukas
Here are a couple of things for you:Nom nom nom I want to eat up some tasty bitchy gossip crums. But my Instagram isn't working so I cant annoy myself by watching her brag and pretend her new baby is as important as the sun. Lol if its a girl as she's playing the whole moon sun male female trite
The intention setting podcast is always free. The "ritual" or whatever she calls the live session is something different, pulls similar things but includes some moving meditation and other stuff that the podcast doesn't. Just to clear that up, not to defend Rachel lol.Here are a couple of things for you:
1) New Year’s Eve she posted a story of her and Olivia toasting and having a sip of what appeared to be champagne. My assumption is it was champagne. She didn’t say it was or wasn’t and she only showed them having one sip so not sure they had more than that. I felt she was just stirring up drama again to increase her engagement numbers or just to be a beyotch. To me it seems like something that might be controversial and could stir up some drama.
2) It appears her 2023 intention-setting pod is out for free? If I were one of her subscribers or someone who paid $20 for it, I would be pissed. Is it worth it to pay money just to be with her ‘live’? Maybe there are so few subscribers and paying people now it doesn’t matter?
Good to know. One less thing to be pissed about.The intention setting podcast is always free. The "ritual" or whatever she calls the live session is something different, pulls similar things but includes some moving meditation and other stuff that the podcast doesn't. Just to clear that up, not to defend Rachel lol.
Oh, one more thing. She said she felt the baby move for the first time in the first hours of the New Year as she was meditating and pulling some cards. Is anyone buying that or do we think this sounds a little too magical and serendipitous to be real?Nom nom nom I want to eat up some tasty bitchy gossip crums. But my Instagram isn't working so I cant annoy myself by watching her brag and pretend her new baby is as important as the sun. Lol if its a girl as she's playing the whole moon sun male female trite
Was it a fox? I thought it was a wolf and thought if he's a boy she might name him something silly like Sol Wolf, cause, Nordic sun god and super special card she'll tell us more about once she's given birth. It'd totally work with Fox too thoughOh, one more thing. She said she felt the baby move for the first time in the first hours of the New Year as she was meditating and pulling some cards. Is anyone buying that or do we think this sounds a little too magical and serendipitous to be real?Oh and she pulled the card with a fox on it, which she thinks is really great, but she can’t tell followers what it means until after the birth.
For some reason I thought it was a fox, but I could be wrong.Was it a fox? I thought it was a wolf and thought if he's a boy she might name him something silly like Sol Wolf, cause, Nordic sun god and super special card she'll tell us more about once she's given birth. It'd totally work with Fox too though
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?