William and Kate

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Are you ok?
 
Reactions: 23
Is this a screenshot of a Datalounge thread?
 
Is this a screenshot of a Datalounge thread?
I thought thats what it looked like! For the sake of discussion, I think most of it is nonsense. Wills is definitely a Windsor. He was born in June 1982 and the wedding was in July 1981 so 11 months earlier to a 20 year old Princess Diana. Unlikely she was shagging Juan Carlos! FWIW I think they all shag around (including William) but don't have babies out of wedlock because of the Line of succession thing.
 
Reactions: 6
Yes !! Someone did say William was a hundred per Charles towards the end due to Charlotte looking so like the queen!! As for Zara that took me aback!! There wasn’t any rumours as there is no smoke with out fire and all that!! Yes!! They could have children outside of marriage because they are not legitimate they cannot be in the line of succession!! As we all know accidents can happen!! Lol
 
Reactions: 1
William is a tall Windsor he has their big jaw and the Spencer height. Zara reminds me of her dad Mark Philips as she sounds vague and a bit thick when she talks.

She put it about later on in the marriage when the whole 'arrangement' was collapsing but I don't think Juan Carlos was involved.
 
Reactions: 3
Yes I dont doubt she put it about later but within 2 months of the wedding? I doubt it. She barely knew Charles when she married him, so I would have thought her mind would have been on trying to make the marriage work, or at least creating heirs. You are right about the babies too. I was thinking more about if Andrew wasnt Phil's, hed still be the son of The Queen but would he still be in the line if succession if he wasnt Phil's? I suppose legally he would be as hes a child of the marriage but I dont know how much sense that makes!
 
William is Charles, although he favoured Diana when he was younger, he has that horsey mouth and jaw they have, balding hairline and ages the older he gets.
 
Reactions: 8
I also think Harry is Charles, you’ve got
to remember the amount of inbreeding went on in that family, The Queen and Prince Phillip are cousins twice over, The gene pool is messy even with new blood.
 
Reactions: 5
It seems to me that she lost weight ahead of the wedding. I always wondered if it was a stress thing. She is very slight now, not athletic at all.
 
Reactions: 6
Kate shocks me with how skinny she is sometimes. Even wearing a heavy dress coat, her waist is ridiculously small.
 
Reactions: 10
I think Kate looked best when she was dating William before she got married. She looked like a healthy sporty, tall English rose - very natural. All this dieting and looking unnaturally slim is aging her. She wasn't meant to be Queen Letizia sort of small. These are some pictures of her after graduation and before her wedding. I think she looked best during these times. TBH I liked her fashion / clothes she wore back then better - it had a natural rich girl but I'm not trying to hard look to it. I wonder if gaining some muscle would help.
a
 
Reactions: 5
She looked fab back then, she started to lose weight just before the engagement (Will and she had a deal on when to get married, she knew it was coming) and then lost even more during the engagement (which to be fair happens to many women due to stress) and she's been stick-thin ever since.
I don't think more muscle would help, she excersizes like crazy already and you can see the muscle definition when she wears short and skin tight stuff. More muscle and she'll look very masculine (she already does sometimes).
She always looked great during pregnancy as well, due to the fat gain and she looked younger every time as well.
 
Reactions: 4
I don’t think she looked good in her wedding dress because of it either. The style of it - the way the lace and bodice were cut - made it look like tiny boobs just stuck on to a skeletal body.

Meghan really showed up the difference, even with them both pregnant and postpartum at different times. Kate looked drawn and ill once she "had got her figure back" whereas Meghan looked slim, ypunger and bouncing with health. Mind you, Meghan doesn't smoke as Kate is said to do (to keep her weight down?). Kate is really starting to look too thin, especially in her face, which is very ageing; the stripes of harsh makeup don't help.
 
Reactions: 10
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.