Telly Fanatic
VIP Member
they don't charge for consultation fees when you take your dog back for the post op check on stitches ect.
Absolutely agree with your comments about rehoming. This is why I have cats from a breeder which I do feel bad about but I couldn't rescue as I lived in a flat at a time, then when I wanted a second one, I couldn't get one as they all either had to go to a home where there are no other pets or had to be allowed to go outside. As I don't want to have an outdoor cat it's almost impossible to rescue, considering all the other requirements tooDon't get me started on the cost of human healthcare, it's insane. An old school friend in the states is facing $1million in medical debt due to
needing an emergency cesarean for twins and having all kinds of complications for both her and the babies. Even with insurance she's still looking at paying back $900k. It's absolutely obscene.
I don't mind paying a fair price for emergency/out of hours care, I know it comes at a premium to get any service at unsociable hours, but there should be regulations on it so that people (and animals) aren't taken advantage of. There should be encouragement/incentives of some kind for independent vets to offer their own in-house emergency care so that people aren't forced to choose between paying extortionate fees to a profit-focused franchise and the welfare/life of their beloved pets.
Your rabbit sounds like quite a little character.
It is criminal, really. What gets me is - I have a cousin in Brazil. She can literally go on Amazon.br and order the same medication that I have to pay £25 for a prescription for. She can walk into a pet store and buy antibiotics and painkillers too. No one there abuses the system. There is a major street dog/cat problem which is utterly heartbreaking, but the fact they can access medication so freely and so cheaply is just bizarre to me considering how tightly it's controlled here.
I agree owning a pet is a privilege and not a right, but at the same time with the state of the world/country right now, maybe people have taken on pets because they could afford them and are now finding they can't, simply because the country is circling the drain.
Pets are what literally get many people out of bed in the morning. I know folks who love their pets more than their own children! Having a bond with an animal is a wonderful and something that costs shouldn't prohibit.
It's a huge responsibility to take on a pet, but we're never going to get a grip on the crisis of so many animals needing homes and rescues being absolutely overrun unless it becomes more affordable to keep a pet.
Also, rescue centers need to get a grip with their rehoming policies because refusing adoptions because someone works full time is ridiculous. I've known so many folks go to adopt only to be rejected because they work 7-8 hours a day, only to go out and buy a puppy instead. I'm sorry but how is anyone expected to pay to maintain a pet without holding down a job? It's ludicrous. It's all a vicious circle that needs to be addressed.
Well if we're going down that route, why not just skip the pet thing entirely and pay people to interact with the elderly? If it's to cure loneliness.On an entirely different note....
Just had the misfortune of catching a few minutes of Loose Women.....One of today's topics is how the government are now trialing a scheme where old people are given robot pets to "cure loneliness".
Am I naive to think it would have been better overall to give those lonely old people actual real life pets? Ones who are stuck in shelters, and I dunno....maybe put the tax payers money they're pumping into robots into employing people to help support those old folks in caring for the pets? Like a dog walking/vet transport/general pet care scheme?
Maybe solve a bit of the unemployment crisis too, while benefiting the lives of the elderly? Plus giving them the added interaction of the person who supports them to care for the pet coming to visit regularly...
But sure, let's pay thousands of pounds of tax payers money on soulless robots while dogs and cats etc sit awaiting loving homes in overrun shelters up and down the country.
(And before anyone comes at me going on about behavioural issues and costs and the complexities of such a project....I know there would be issues to work around to make it work and assessments needed and what not...which is why the government as chose robots, because it's always the easy option that prevails!)
Exactly the amount of times I’ve seen people on Facebook say ‘I’ve rescued this dog it’s got *insert issue* the person I rescued from wasn’t helping it but I can’t afford to take it to the vets So what can I do at home’ So it’s in the exact same position it was before you rescued it then… or ‘my new puppy has *insert condition* I can’t afford the vets what can do I do and how do I protect my other dog’ my issue with this isnt even necessarily the new puppy even though that’s an issue as well, but why get the new puppy to begin with if you wouldn’t have been able to afford it if anything went wrong with the dog you had firstI am well aware that costs are rising an that things can get difficult out the blue, what I mean is that if money is a struggle at the beginning then really you shouldn't be agreeing to take on the responsibility of a pet, at the end of a day whether we like it or not animals are still classed as a luxury an unfortunately there is too many out there that take them on without knowing just how expensive they can become, an am not talking about being in a position where once it was fine an then it's become a struggle, am talking about the spontaneous buyers that are in no fit position to afford a pet never mind be able to cover vet fees, I have known people to get rabbits then not bother to ever get them vaccinated because of costs which isn't fair to the rabbit, or people that get a dog then dont bother to keep up with health checks or vaccines, there are charities out there to help but most of them struggle because they are paying out for people who were never going to be able to pay in the first place for a pet an the people who once afforded the pet an now have fallen out the blue on hard times are being left because the charities cant help due to limited finances
What concerns me is now you'll be charged a consult fee AND the price of the treatment/medication. It always used to be if they prescribed something, or did jabs etc, you wouldn't pay the consult fee too....but now it seems a lot of places are charging for both at full price and to me that's absolutely unacceptable. I'm okay with paying for a consult, but to charge an obscene mark up on meds AND a consultation fee is just a piss take if you ask me.Our vets is £45 per consultation which on face value feels pricey, but when I factor in the fact that I can always get a same day appointment and free parking right outside and they don’t ever try and upsell me on any treatments because they know I’m not on insurance I think it’s actually quite reasonable.
Yep, VetsNow are the absolute worst. They should in no way be allowed to operate, I don't know a single person who's used them who hasn't been absolutely extorted for emergency care. Most independent vets used to run their own A&E/overnight services, which allowed for a great continuity of care and familiarity, which I feel is important for sick pets, but they've almost all sold out to VetsNow and someone needs to find out why....VetsNow are insanely overpriced. We had an out of hours emergency with our dog about 7 years ago and were signposted to a locally run animal a&e type practice, the consulation cost was obviously more than a normal appointment but the care was incredible and I didn't feel completely ripped off at the end of it. Last year we had another and were told by that same practice that they now can't see us as VetsNow have the contract for our normal practice so we had no choice but to go to them instead. Not only were the fees for parts of it ridiculous (£40 on top of the £200 injection to administer it) but they sneaked on a charity donation too probably knowing full well that at 2am, stressed out and shattered we wouldn't notice or care enough to contest it.
Oh I can't be bothered with this tonight, we're trying to re-home a dog, I don't feel the need to explain myself to you anymore..,..I
I said if it doesn’t work? I said try but some of these dogs are in rescues for years or in homes where they are locked away for safety I just don’t believe that’s a good life for a dog especially if nothing is helping them after trying treatment (medical or behavioural). If they can be helped and happily live I didn’t say anything about behaviourists or there work it just depends on the dog and how they cope and I believe sometimes it just doesn’t help just like some medical conditions cannot be
I totally get that but at the end of the day the rising costs of vets are not any different to everything else, maybe it's just me but am just not understanding this hatred because of vets increasing prices when vets too are trying to survive an make a living, vets also have to pay electric bills which are soaring because of company's trying to make a profit, they also have water bills to pay because of company's trying to make profit, food prices are also going up, so it makes sense that medicines are also rising in order to keep up with inflation, our problem is our own wages not keeping up with the constant rising of everything around usThat’s exactly why I identified responsible owners specifically. People who got pets because they can afford them and due to unforeseen circumstances are no longer able to
The rising costs of vets and medications specifically aren’t helping with that. I understand they are running a business and costs are going to rise. However, something is clearly going wrong with the amount being charged for medicines
I wont touch vets now with a barge pole. They incorrectly diagnosed my cat, wouldn't even do any physical exams, just went on look. Cost us well over £200 for a tub of cream (which she didn't need!) and an exam.VetsNow are insanely overpriced. We had an out of hours emergency with our dog about 7 years ago and were signposted to a locally run animal a&e type practice, the consulation cost was obviously more than a normal appointment but the care was incredible and I didn't feel completely ripped off at the end of it. Last year we had another and were told by that same practice that they now can't see us as VetsNow have the contract for our normal practice so we had no choice but to go to them instead. Not only were the fees for parts of it ridiculous (£40 on top of the £200 injection to administer it) but they sneaked on a charity donation too probably knowing full well that at 2am, stressed out and shattered we wouldn't notice or care enough to contest it.
It would have been. They'd be risking the animals welfare to charge for the removal of stitches separately. I'm sure many owners would bypass the vet and try removing them at home and cause God knows what complications as a result. So the cost has to be included for the animals protection.yes coming to think of it possibly the payment for the after care was already in the bill and paid for![]()
Don’t get a pet thenI'm not saying the medications should be free, but they claim the absolutely insane mark up on them is to cover overheads (which includes fees for their expertise) and what not. So if that's being covered by the price of the medication, what's the additional consult fee for? They literally sell drugs that go for 0.25p (inc VAT) a dose for £7 each!
I'm not saying they shouldn't be charging, I'm saying their fees shouldn't be so extortionate because it's beginning to look like profiteering when so many practices (usually franchises) are pricing pet owners out of ownership and contributing to the rescue center crisis.
Not to mention, potentially leading to animal suffering and death. As it was reported yesterday people are treating their pets with human meds because they can't afford the treatment they need - that is beyond messed up!
It's not in any way comparable to say "oh, a private doctor charges for x, y and z" because we always have the NHS to fall back on regardless. People go private for quicker, more bespoke care. They don't HAVE TO pay to access treatment in the same way pet owners do.
There's also no private emergency care, so people are never in the situation of being faced with the horrific choice of being unable to avoid to save someone they love in the same way pet owners are in critical conditions. In those cases, vets absolutely have folks over a barrel and there should be laws against profiting on that, if only in the name of animal welfare.
There is literally no alternative to consulting a vet when your pet is sick, and putting accessing that care (which is essentially an otherwise inaccessible resource/commodity) at such an extortionate price is, as I said, essentially profiteering.
I have no doubt that Brexit is responsible for a lot of this, including the massive hikes in treatment prices since around 2019. And yes, I understand it's difficult to get staff to do any kind of night shift in any profession, but speaking from what I've seen in my area - there are eight vets within a 10 mile radius. In 2016/7 - eight of them did their own overnight care, with a veterinary nurse in-house, with a vet on call. Now, 2024....not a single one of them offer their own emergency or overnight care. Even when an animal is admitted in office hours they have to be transferred (by the owner) out to VetsNow for monitoring, or as you say, they're left alone all night.
I don't think it's right to leave sick animals (sometimes critically ill) with no care through the night, but I think it's just as wrong to expect owners to pay ridiculous trumped up charges at a franchise to monitor their pets while their usual vet is closed. It's not only ridiculously expensive, it's also distressing for both the animal and their owners.
Companies like VetsNow have an absolute monopoly on emergency pet care and that is not right, regardless of the reason for vets selling out to them.
Some do and if they don't it's all included in the overall price of the surgery. And when they charge ridiculous sums for more minor 'treatments' (for example just shy of £10 to put a piece of dental floss around a skin growth) I don't think it's saying much that there's no charge for signing off on an actual surgical wound.
I'd say it's probably because your vet is not a franchise. Most independent vets don't advertise the fact they're owned by a franchise though, so it looks like a good independent practice, when it's far from it. Most indies are selling out to franchises/corporations on the quiet.
I think a lot of it also depends on pet insurance. I've seen several vets eyes light up when they know my pets are insured. I've also compared the cost of my 'insured' care to the costs for the same/similar care friends and family have received for their uninsured pets and there is definitely more/higher charges when insurance is involved.
And again, this is why we should be terrified of losing the NHS.
I'm not saying the medications should be free, but they claim the absolutely insane mark up on them is to cover overheads (which includes fees for their expertise) and what not. So if that's being covered by the price of the medication, what's the additional consult fee for? They literally sell drugs that go for 0.25p (inc VAT) a dose for £7 each!Why shouldn’t they charge for a consult fee as well as the medications? They are spending their time looking at your pet, examining them, possibly doing tests - deciding what medication is needed. You’re paying for their time and knowledge, so imo you should have to pay for that. Without that time and knowledge you wouldn’t be getting any drugs.
I just had a quick google because I wasn’t sure but if a human went to a private doctor they’d pay a consult fee, prescription fee and then pay for the medication, so why should vets be any different as they are providing the same service just for animals. I think maybe the only time they don’t charge for consult fees are vaccinations from what I’ve seen.
I’d say reason most practices don’t do their own out of hours anymore is due to staffing issues plus probably the extra cost to the practices. Theres a shortage of vets and nurses in the UK, which brexit made worse as a lot of vets were from the EU.
Probably easier to find staff for full time night shifts than doing a mix of days/nights but a lot of practices that would do their own out of hours would use on call staff so they wouldn’t always be at the practice. This will also possibly effect the running of the day time practice if staff who have been there all night for an emergency then cannot work the next day. Also if a practice does out of hours with on call staff then animals may possibly be left in the practice alone at night with check ups throughout as the staff won’t likely stay the whole night, which a lot of owners wouldn’t like.
Some do and if they don't it's all included in the overall price of the surgery. And when they charge ridiculous sums for more minor 'treatments' (for example just shy of £10 to put a piece of dental floss around a skin growth) I don't think it's saying much that there's no charge for signing off on an actual surgical wound.they don't charge for consultation fees when you take your dog back for the post op check on stitches ect.
I'd say it's probably because your vet is not a franchise. Most independent vets don't advertise the fact they're owned by a franchise though, so it looks like a good independent practice, when it's far from it. Most indies are selling out to franchises/corporations on the quiet.Again could be because he's a rabbit or maybe it's cause it's a private an not a franchise so they have slightly more freedom over what an when they will charge or not
I live in Scotland so don't pay for prescription meds so maybe I'm spoiledI was loathed to comment on this, but as a Veterinary Nurse, my thoughts.
Prescriptions. A 15 minute vet appointment (at my practice) is £40. So effectively 1min of vet time = £2.60. Our £23 prescription charge equates to about 9 minutes. Which I think is fair. How much does a solicitor charge for a letter?
Online Pharmacies can sell drugs for less than veterinary practices can buy them for from our wholesalers.
If you are against the corporates such as IVC, CVS, Medivet, Vets4Pets, Linnaeus, consider what else they own and what else they are profiteering from.
(Pssst, IVC own Pet Drugs Online)
Regarding using human drugs. You realise that's just how much they cost? @Mamacita, I'm intrigued, how much are you buying them for from your doctor?
@ranchdistressing . I'm really confused about your insurance saying that's a separate claim, pretty sure that's not at all right. £900 for an overnight stay does sound extortionate, depending on what's wrong with your pet and the care required. When I work nights, I doing a lot more than just taking your animals temperature!
Clients expectationsband demands of vet practices has grown exponentially in the past 6 years. The phones calls we get at 2/3/4am are insane and it takes its toll.
The main thing I would like the public to remember is. The vets, nurses, receptionist you are seeing daily are (mostly) not in charge of setting prices, and we certainly aren't taking in £100k's a year. New graduate vets earn between 35k-40k. Usually working 40 hour week, nights and weekends on call. As a 16yr experienced RVN, working 37hrs /week, with management responsibilities I'm on £30k.
My profession has one of the highest suicide rates of all. Please be kind to us.
In a sense I do agree with that, pets are a privilege, but I do know from personal reasons that pets do wonders for mental health, having a little companion especially when you are on your own can really make a difference, I feel like if you are struggling then being more a foster home is better as the company's that do it will cover the vet fees for you but you get the benefit of having the petHowever in the end owning a pet is a privilege and is not mandatory, so people shouldn't get one if they can't afford vet fees and/or insurance.