Don’t get a pet then
pets are a privilege and it’s up to the person who gets them to be able to afford them.
You do realize that no one in life is immune from a downfall, right? And that many people who were able to afford pets when they got them suddenly end up struggling to afford them, or being completely unable to? Hence the crisis in animal shelters across the country.
More so, how many people have kids without considering the fact that child could be born sick, or get sick at some point in their lives? Would you turn around when the NHS is gone and say "yeah, well, shouldn't have had a kid if you can't afford to make them better?"
Vets fees are definitely a massive issue in the UK. I gave examples of Brazil above, but it's the same in Spain. What costs me £140 a year in boosters for a single dog, my aunt in Spain gets for £50 for two. One of her dogs had bladder cancer, was a whole ordeal for 12 months and it cost her less than £1k in treatment. My best friend's dog of the same breed had the same condition with a better prognosis and only 6 months later, it cost her £8k. Vets charging obscene amounts seems ever more to be a British problem than standard practice for the profession. Much like most things happening in this country right now, we're being mugged off left and right for profiteering.
- just saw someone said that but it’s true so I’ll also say it. They are a business, how much do energy companies charge and how much profit do they get, a lot more profit than vets. And people need heat etc.
Yeah, and I don't agree with that either. But again, there are ways around reducing the amount of energy you use (putting on a coat/layers etc). When prices go up in shops, there are cheaper alternatives too, but vets have everyone over a barrel because there is literally no alternative to the care they can provide.
but at the end of the day vet care is like
Private human healthcare, a business and if getting a pet that should be thought about first. And I’ve seen people say vet care is a lot cheaper than human private healthcare.
It's not remotely comparable. Private human healthcare is a choice, for most an all out luxury. We can choose to go private at any point and still go back to the NHS. Private health care (fortunately) isn't our only option in the way it is with veterinary care.
You don't find many people calling their private healthcare provider at 3am on a Wednesday because someone is vomiting violently and having a seizure, because emergency private healthcare does not exist. We can call 999 for help and be put back right for free. We don't have to go running to the nearest emergency vets and come away with a debt of thousands.
Also where are stricter rules regarding breeding. Because at the end of the day bad breeding will lead to a lot of money being spent on vet bills.
Look at frenchies for example, breathing issues, spinal issues, eye issues, brain issues, elbow breaks, skin issues and some which can be sold for thousands and usually the worse specimens being sold for more I think e.g. the big rope ones. People spend thousands on a puppy yet when it breaks its leg and the owners doesn’t have the money to fix it it’s the vets fault.
This I agree with. Breeders are completely unscrupulous and often simply in it for the money. I loathe people who will have a litter of puppies/kittens and defend it by saying they're "not a breeder"....if you've facilitated an animal pregnancy - you're a breeder. End of!
I was absolutely disgusted to see Channel 4 doing that show following backyard breeders a few months back. Especially in a cost of living crisis where there's nothing stopping anyone from thinking they'll make a few quid from getting their pet knocked up.
Frenchies should be banned if you ask me. At least until the health issues have been bred out. But there's a big difference between paying an initial outlay of £1k and then facing a sudden vet bill of £5k and/or repeated treatments every month of £100+.
I personally think there should be a law that says anyone owning a pet should be forced to purchase at least some form of pet insurance, but that in itself would lead to further profiteering from the insurance companies who are already taking the piss by excluding conditions and denying claims.
vets are completely privatised. There’s no government pot that feeds into it and they have a lot of overheads.
I've said as much earlier in the thread. We're supposed to be a nation of animal lovers and I would happily pay a couple of quid extra in tax each month if it went to a system where vets were better supported and veterinary medicine/treatment was cheaper and more accessible for pet owners.
I work for a private company, not doing anything remotely complicated in comparison but charge 500-1k a day for my time and it’s because people are paying for the expertise, so I don’t have a problem doing the same when it comes to caring for my cats.
Well good for you, earning that much a day you've clearly got no problems in finding the money necessary to pay for treatment. Same can't be said for about 70% of the pet owning population though.
Pharmaceutical companies have a lot to do with it too- vet wholesalers are generally charged more than for human pharmacies. And also insurance companies- they are a massive issue, there’s little to no benefit of keeping my cat insured because of the sheer amount of things they will not cover.
As I said in earlier in the thread, I'm not convinced it is veterinary pharma as you can purchase a tablet that a vet will charge you £7 for 25p online. I'd like to know who actually is responsible for the mark up on the medication they prescribe.
Pet insurance is a joke, even if you think you're covered, you're not, and generally you're only covered until the pet turns 8/9 years old, which is shameful when dogs can live to 10-14 fairly easily and cats even older, especially if they're indoor. You often end up having to pay a certain percentage of the cost of treatment, even while still paying for a fully comp policy. It's another racket, which needs looking into, especially these companies that cherrypick from their terms and conditions or suddenly change them mid policy (as once you've claimed for an illness you're screwed for getting cover elsewhere) but it's a thousand percent better to have a policy in place to cover some of the costs than have nothing to fall back on.
Because as they say, we're all only one banana skin away from disaster or disability, and the same goes for animals unfortunately.