No, I distinctly remember her saying it was problematic. This was probably about 1.5- 2 years ago. The last time I looked at her stories (or was it a live?) she was very annoyed as she received a DM from someone reminding her that she previously said GW was a bad thing, and a major cause of financial disparity.I think you might have crossed wires here as I thought she always made it clear her stance on generational wealth was that it was a good thing (or something that everyone would aspire to have, why wouldn't they)? but that unfortunately it was something that people from marginalised communities were not able to accrue as easily which is the problematic part, wouldnt exactly say bitter, it's just a crappy system because not everyone benefits from it. Now shes in a position to create that for her children and rightly so. Wouldnt call it a "u-turn", just more of what many of us would love to work towards and be in the same position to do.
ETA: IN one of her early take overs there was an account that said their aim was to provide generational wealth for their children (it was in the form of housing) and I remember being quite surprised that she featured it considering her previous opinions. Anyway, at a later stage she said that account made her change her ideas about GW, and they also wanted to do that for their kids. I'm not critisizing this change of mind, BTW, it is something I aim to do. My original point was that she gets really annoyed if people point these things out.
Last edited: