The Radford Family #16 The money's gone to their heads, the kids still have to share beds

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
That really shows what a horrible bitch and the kind of person she is . when she herself and her husband were taken in and adopted she should have alot more empathy and kindness towards Chris'partner and kids

I'm sure she will have a lot to say if ophelia is treated like that in the future if Millie goes on to have more kids with a new partner and new partners family treat Ophelia like she is not 'real family'
 
Reactions: 19
Yes I agree. For people who claim that family is everything, Sue and Noel are sure as hell only about their own family. Unless there are Radford genes involved, they're not interested. You'd think that people who claim to love kids so much would be thrilled to welcome any new child into their family, to join in the chaos and swell the numbers further, but they seem to have a bizarre obsession with keeping the family 'Radford pure'. The way they cast aside those boys is terrible. Anyone I know with step-grandchildren very much counts them in the numbers when asked how many grandkids they have but not the Radfords. I bet many of their minions don't even know Nicole has older boys. Why would they unless they looked her up themselves, as Sue and Noel never mention them.

With the amount of kids they have spawned, it's inevitable they'll end up with shed loads of step-grandchildren along the way, whether their children meet someone who already has kids before starting a family of their own, as Chris has done, or whether it's from a new relationship further down the line, after already producing their own kids and then suffering a relationship breakdown. Some of their own daughters may even, shock horror, have children with multiple men like Nicole has (Millie for certain, if she has any more). They need to get use to that idea quickly, otherwise they risk distancing the lot of them. We know they have a strained relationship with Chris. Do they really want to push all of them away for their unacceptance of any child who is not a spawn of their own genes? Or their judgement of anyone starting new relationships after a break up involving children?

Sue has been completely trapped by Noel for the whole of her life, stuck in an endless cycle of child rearing. I actually think she's perhaps envious of any woman who escapes the monotony of an unhappy relationship, as she must often wonder what type of life she could have had if she hadn't stayed. We all know that, pre-fame, this was not a happy marriage. We've all heard the stories of how Noel spent every evening at the pub and how they were always rowing. She seems to have a real dislike of women who escape such situations and, shock horror, go on to have children with different men. That's got to come from somewhere. Poor cow has such a complex back story, I don't actually think she knows how to be happy with what she's got. She's always searching for her next fix of happiness, and seems insanely jealous of anyone else who appears happy with their lot.

Oh, there's that word again, jealous. Only this time Sue I'm directing it towards you, and I truly believe you are jealous of other people's happiness. We all know that money doesn't bring true happiness.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: 26
I can't imagine being like that to a child. The cruelty of it. My son has a lovely girlfriend who has a 3 year old boy. I've known that little lad since he was 5 months old. I adore him and my only worry is that if they ever break up, I won't get to keep being a part of his life. I've actually told my son's partner that and she has promised me that no matter what happens I always will be part of their family .
 
Reactions: 42
Unfortunately for Sue, anything that does make her happy seems short lived. Babies and puppies grow up, new furniture/appliances/tat become worn/broken and then she's back in the cycle of looking for the next fix. She never seems content with what she's got.

I often wonder how her and Noel's relationship will survive when most of the kids have flown the nest. They've been so use to it all being about the kids for so long, they're not use to spending time just the two of them (unless it's for a quick shag to produce yet another crotch goblin ) and that's really not healthy in a relationship.

They've never struck me as a strong couple. They've created a massive family unit to paper over the cracks of their unhappy pasts. Underneath, I don't see a couple genuinely still in love after all these years. I see two people very use to existing together, in a massive household where many days their paths don't even cross much until bedtime.

She is dependent on him. Very different to love. Only time will tell with their relationship, but my prediction is an almighty struggle to continue papering over the cracks once the babies dry up (which it appears they might be).
 
Reactions: 22
It's surprising sue seems to prefer all her other grandchildren over Chris's. I have two older sisters who each had a child before meeting their new partners and having another each and all the grandparents and partners love all the children as their own regardless of them being biological or not. One relationship unfortunately didn't work out during lockdown. I wonder does sue not want to be closer to some of the grandchildren incase Chris and his partner were to split? The other grandchildren are all biologically their family so wouldn't go anywhere. Unfortunately it's what happened with one sister, her now ex partner and his family are unlikely to see them.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: 8
They'll probably adopt from abroad or even have a surrogate! Probably one of their kids.

Chloe seems to be keeping her head down
 
Reactions: 5
if she keeps treating her sons and families the way she treats Chris and his family she will push her sons away .someday she could be the one left looking in when her sons come together with their own families and want nothing to do with her.
 
Reactions: 9
Not defending her but could it be the childrens dad and his family don’t want their names being used by the radfords
 
Reactions: 9
They'll probably adopt from abroad or even have a surrogate! Probably one of their kids.

Chloe seems to be keeping her head down
That would be vile and would surely not go down well even with their minions. Someone carrying their own parents baby is beyond icky, especially when they already have 22! I really can't see that happening.

I don't think they will have any more if they can't biologically. They can't brag about something they needed help with so it wouldn't be their style.

As for adoption, they may claim they're interested in fostering but it's because it sounds good. They don't care about any child not biologically there's so I can't see it myself. No way the authorities in this country will give them a child anyway (thank God), you need a spare bedroom for starters as well as passing a shit load of other tests (such as suitability to provide enough care and attention that that child needs - they'd simply become another number in the Radford household so they're grossly unsuitable for fostering or adoption). Yes they could go abroad, where sadly checks seem to be less stringent, but I can't see them wanting to personally. They're too selfish to want to care for a child that's not their own.
 
Reactions: 10
Not defending her but could it be the childrens dad and his family don’t want their names being used by the radfords
Oh yeah because the Chavfords are so particular about respecting other people's wishes. No they've made it very clear that they don't consider those older boys part of the family. It would be a disgraceful way for any adult to behave but for two people who were themselves adopted, it's galling.
 
Reactions: 17
Not defending her but could it be the childrens dad and his family don’t want their names being used by the radfords
Nothing wrong with saying 'Nicole's other boys'. I know what you're saying, but I can't see it being that personally. They don't acknowledge them in any form whatsoever (and from what others have said on here I got the impression the other dads weren't involved anyway - but may be wrong).

There's ways of acknowledging children without saying their names or plastering them all over social media.
 
Reactions: 10
Not defending her but could it be the childrens dad and his family don’t want their names being used by the radfords
If that’s the case she could have just said “everyone at Christophers”.
 
Reactions: 12
She's said "we need to buy a outside highchair"
Yes I heard that but it was for heidie not sure why they can’t carry her inside one outside. It’s not like they are going to be eating outside all the time. We rarely get nice Weather and it only last for a couple of weeks.
 
Reactions: 13
I think it might've been the KAC when Sophie got married that Noel said someone said to him that when Chris an Sophie were grown up "you'll both still be young and have your lives to do want you want". Noels reply was along the lines of "oh no I'm glad we have all these kids to keep us where we are" something to that affect. This struck me at the time as a bit strange, like he was saying he wouldn't want it to be just him and sue. So maybe the relationship isn't as wonderful as they make it out to be?
 
Reactions: 13
Looking at YouTube earnings after another YouTuber I watch was very upfront,the radfords are pulling in upwards of £10k a month on YouTube, not including insta, paid ads, the magic pie shop etc.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: 15
The kids keep them so busy they don't actually have to spend a lot of time alone together, and I genuinely believe they're both quite happy with that arrangement.
 
Reactions: 11
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…