I just threw up in my mouth. He is such an ugly ugly man.
But how do we know this is actually true? And not just made up to make it look like the ‘trolls’ are out of everyone? I don’t really care about the people who support the inghams. Young children don’t understand what he has done. The adults should know better. But are probably unaware or ignorant to what Chris and Sarah have done. The parent who wrote that post should have clarified the age of the so called bully who called out their child for wearing the merch. As my guess it would be another young child and children can be mean at times. I highly doubt a grown adult would go out of their way to hurl abuse at a young child for wearing that. If they did they must be unhinged. I call bullshit on it though. Just another way to drum up hate towards people like us who state facts and truth about how horrible Chris and Sarah are.No child should be getting abuse/bullied because of merchandise. It isn't their fault that two grown adults are manipulating viewers into asking parents to buy "limited" must have products.
Parents are responsible and need to start monitoring their child's online activity closer and those that do know need to educate others in a mature way not attack. Just because a channel is on YouTube doesn't mean it is safe.
I don't understand why Sarah doesn't get hers and the girls hair cut. I've an 11 year old daughter and I book her in for a cut and blow dry every 6-8 weeks. Costs me £18 so hardly breaks the bank.Anyone want to comment on izzys insta story and tell her its because her hair needs a good cut
Primark coat for Izzy, begrudging buying them more school shoes when they need them, yet this Lazy lump can buy herself boots, coat and a ring costing £200+ in one week? The girls are the reason that they make most of their money and get cheap plastic tat to show for it and nothing substantial. Disgusting parents.£100 to look like the Michelin Man! £42 for the patent boots!! Lazy only seems to like spending money on herself! While Izzy got a £15 coat from Primark.
View attachment 57862
Because Sarah is a lazy selfish ugly bitch. She doesn’t truly care about those kids. She can’t be bothered to raise them right. That’s why parents spoil their kids with over the top gifts and yet won’t buy them proper school shoes or things they actually need. To look good to everyone else while do the bare minimal of actual decent parenting. She feeds that baby crap because it’s easier for her. She only breastfed because she wanted to look good and it was easier than taking care of bottles. Everyone is about Sarah and Sarah only. Chris is the same way. Both probably over indulged spoilt brats with no real consistent parenting teaching them how to be decent human beings. That’s how their kids will turn out too. No morals or kindness just big headed over inflated egos doing what they want and not caring about how it effects others. Sarah it doesn’t matter how much you spend on a coat of anything like that you are still a vile ugly women inside and out.£100 to look like the Michelin Man! £42 for the patent boots!! Lazy only seems to like spending money on herself! While Izzy got a £15 coat from Primark.
View attachment 57862
Either that, or she only likes spending money when Nana is with her£100 to look like the Michelin Man! £42 for the patent boots!! Lazy only seems to like spending money on herself! While Izzy got a £15 coat from Primark.
View attachment 57862
I don't think it's the money, I think she has a thing about really long hair being attractive - someone commented on her following the Duggards?? They all have hair down to their knees - I think she really likes this look! If I'm honest, I think if she cut her hair to just above mid-back and had it layered a bit, especially around her face, I think it would look really pretty on her.I don't understand why Sarah doesn't get hers and the girls hair cut. I've an 11 year old daughter and I book her in for a cut and blow dry every 6-8 weeks. Costs me £18 so hardly breaks the bank.
Probably showing off to her Nana that she can spend that on a coat if she wants but as you say why not get Izzy a decent coat for school she must get tormented with the coat she wears as you couldn't get any cheaper but its different when its for "little boo boo" she gets what she wantsEither that, or she only likes spending money when Nana is with her
Trust me I don’t usually watch and won’t be again ha haAlways watch on invidio so they don’t get paid. I keep saying it so people know. As even hate watching is good for them as it lines their pockets.
Yeah I thought the exact same thing. Sickening reallyDid anyone notice the cash in her grabby little hand when she was in River Island? Looks like Nanna was mugged on the shopping trip.....
Haha yes, that's exactly what she looks likeShe’s trying to look like she’s in year 10 back in the early 2000’s by the looks of that photo
Hello, first post! I'd never even heard of The Ingham Family until I found this website and now I've become lost in this rabbit hole of Ingham threads. Anyway, I know someone has said it previously but he really does look like Ian Watkins. It's creepily uncanny.I just threw up in my mouth. He is such an ugly ugly man.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?