I loathe him, and I gave him a chance because I tend to give most people a chance.
I do feel like London has changed in the last decade, the atmosphere feels different to when I used to go pre 2020s. I avoid it nowadays.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I do feel like London has changed in the last decade, the atmosphere feels different to when I used to go pre 2020s. I avoid it nowadays.
I loathe Khan. I've lived in London for decades and it's gone to tit under his watch.
The publication that is so vocal about free speech has allowed an ENTIRE THREE COMMENTS to appear on an article about travellers moving in on land near the homes and spoiling village life.
I wonder why that could be.
I wonder why that could be.
Daily Mail journalist gets IT to give them the email address of a user that has posted about them hundreds of times. She uses this personal data to turn up at her doorstep.
I decide I'm going to ask the IT desk to find me her email address and send her a message. They send me the details (access to email addresses is permitted under our terms and conditions, in limited circumstances).
archive.is
The examples of her troll comments are:
'Loves herself doesn't she?'
'Saddo.'
'Totally self-obsessed with her looks.'
'Desperado must be her ringtone.'
'Face too ironed and shiny.'
A made up story? I can't imagine the terms really do say they can hand over personal data if you go to IT and ask for it
Also a DM journalist talking of abusive comments when that's the raison d'etre of DM comments! They allow so much worse than tattle would ever allow, but they're always coming for tattle calling it the worst site on the internet.
I decide I'm going to ask the IT desk to find me her email address and send her a message. They send me the details (access to email addresses is permitted under our terms and conditions, in limited circumstances).
'Self-obsessed, needy, saddo': One anonymous online commenter has mer…
archived 1 Aug 2026 15:53:00 UTC
The examples of her troll comments are:
'Loves herself doesn't she?'
'Saddo.'
'Totally self-obsessed with her looks.'
'Desperado must be her ringtone.'
'Face too ironed and shiny.'
A made up story? I can't imagine the terms really do say they can hand over personal data if you go to IT and ask for it
Also a DM journalist talking of abusive comments when that's the raison d'etre of DM comments! They allow so much worse than tattle would ever allow, but they're always coming for tattle calling it the worst site on the internet.
Definitely made up! The apparent "troll" was in their 70s! She thought it appropriate to turn up at a pensioners house to confront her?! Much like GK Barry and the tattle doc.Daily Mail journalist gets IT to give them the email address of a user that has posted about them hundreds of times. She uses this personal data to turn up at her doorstep.
I decide I'm going to ask the IT desk to find me her email address and send her a message. They send me the details (access to email addresses is permitted under our terms and conditions, in limited circumstances).
'Self-obsessed, needy, saddo': One anonymous online commenter has mer…
archived 1 Aug 2026 15:53:00 UTC
The examples of her troll comments are:
'Loves herself doesn't she?'
'Saddo.'
'Totally self-obsessed with her looks.'
'Desperado must be her ringtone.'
'Face too ironed and shiny.'
A made up story? I can't imagine the terms really do say they can hand over personal data if you go to IT and ask for it
Also a DM journalist talking of abusive comments when that's the raison d'etre of DM comments! They allow so much worse than tattle would ever allow, but they're always coming for tattle calling it the worst site on the internet.
Do these people not understand irony?! I think turning up at people's houses is way worse than any shady comment/s made online. But what do I know I'm just a silly little tattle troll.
Once again the word troll being used incorrectly. Had she stayed out of the comments she'd have no idea what people were saying about her.
Found the part about the "troll" hiding at home spewing venom hilarious. She does realise WiFi, laptops and smart phones etc exist? You could be on the moon and commenting. The implication all "trolls" are hiding at home with nothing better to do is absurd.
That's really out of order. She should not be trying to confront anyone who's made comments about her or be allowed to do this.Daily Mail journalist gets IT to give them the email address of a user that has posted about them hundreds of times. She uses this personal data to turn up at her doorstep.
I decide I'm going to ask the IT desk to find me her email address and send her a message. They send me the details (access to email addresses is permitted under our terms and conditions, in limited circumstances).
'Self-obsessed, needy, saddo': One anonymous online commenter has mer…
archived 1 Aug 2026 15:53:00 UTC
The examples of her troll comments are:
'Loves herself doesn't she?'
'Saddo.'
'Totally self-obsessed with her looks.'
'Desperado must be her ringtone.'
'Face too ironed and shiny.'
A made up story? I can't imagine the terms really do say they can hand over personal data if you go to IT and ask for it
Also a DM journalist talking of abusive comments when that's the raison d'etre of DM comments! They allow so much worse than tattle would ever allow, but they're always coming for tattle calling it the worst site on the internet.
As you say no Tattlers are turning up to confront anyone in person (I certainly hope not anyway).
It's a good thing dhe didn't meet the woman in question because who knows what might have happened.
The constant incorrect usage of the term "troll/trolling" always narks me.
They're conflating the term with "other" online behaviours that aren't trolling (if they actually happened as described)
It's a catch all term now denigration wise.
Hence becoming increasingly meaningless.
They're conflating the term with "other" online behaviours that aren't trolling (if they actually happened as described)
It's a catch all term now denigration wise.
Hence becoming increasingly meaningless.
It makes me laugh almost when they get all self-righteous and say things like "the Daily Mail has chosen not to name them" or "the Daily Mail has chosen not to publish the most graphic photos" when they name and shame people who have done nothing on a daily basis and post what is basically snuff porn often.
Aside from politicians, is there anyone more hypocritical than these "journalists"?
Aside from politicians, is there anyone more hypocritical than these "journalists"?
What gets me is the things she’s saying are trolling are at worst witchy 
I read the article trying to find what vile terrible things were said…but no. That was it
I read the article trying to find what vile terrible things were said…but no. That was it
Whether it is being done by humans, AI, or both the writing gets worse every day. What even is this paragraph!
I don't think there is anyone DM commentors despite more than people with disabilities or neurodivergent issues. I've made a promise to myself to no longer read comments on stories about these things, it is soul destroying.
Unfortunately they have the tendency to bleat on about these subjects even when the story isn't about them, somehow the weirdly obsessed commentors will make a link.
Unfortunately they have the tendency to bleat on about these subjects even when the story isn't about them, somehow the weirdly obsessed commentors will make a link.
Yes Archive.is or Archive.ph
You can also try
RemovePaywall | Free online paywall remover
Remove Paywall, free online paywall remover. Get access to articles without having to pay or login. Works on Bloomberg and hundreds more.
www.removepaywall.com
They are obseesed with the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, so many articles about them.
It’s SO tedious.
It really is.
Yes it is rather irksome as most people are sick to death of them. Still Harry owes the Mail millions after losing his court case against them
Can't blame the Mail for sticking the knife in. I think they've been quite soft on him so far and are saving the more juicy stuff for a later date. He put some of their journalists through months of hell and had no evidence against them. Has he apologised? No of course not because he a whingeing entitled manbaby.
It is Harry and his PR team who constantly leak to the media so he is the architect of his own misfortune because he can never back down and admit he was wrong about anything. He's always the victim
🥱
Seeing all those articles on H&M has put me off even looking at the DM. They have cured me of any curiosity I may have had about anything they print. Also the tedious Beckham reports.