The Chateau Diaries #153 She looked old as Christ's donkey, although she was dressed as a spring virgin

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Shooting my mouth off, I apologize. The hobby horse I'm riding is the reaming the Brit OGs give/gave newbies back in the day, and I seem to have done the same thing.
There's a lot of that going around today.
One reason never to turn on Unignore.
Dearest Harp, it's a jungle out here and today I was one of the most flea-ridden denizens.
 
Reactions: 8
Wow, love bombing at it's finest... Never seen Tatyana so chatty in real life. I've never trusted her.. I have good instinct clearly.
 
Reactions: 23
Logic tells me that Michael's lastest was a Patreon exclusive, but can any of his (former) Patreon members confirm it?
 
Reactions: 14
I wonder if the multiple comments today on Michael’s vlog that show they’re 1 year old is proof that he’s buying comments? The footage is clearly old…maybe the purchased comments are tied to the age of the footage? I don’t know….but it’s very weird. Something strange is going on.

Just an interesting tidbit…between Jan ‘21 - Jun ‘21, Michael released 14 videos. Keep in mind, he was in Madrid for several months during that time. Even though he was “sexing it up” in Spain, he still found time to release 14 videos. However, as of today, June, he’s only released 8 videos so far in 2022…including his “Fresh Start” video. And, two of the videos he’s released this year are of old footage…he’s really only made 6 new videos so far. What’s going on with the cottage? Painting the bedroom? The new staircase? There’s plenty of content…but I guess you need to be at Begmania to film it, instead of partying in London.
 
Reactions: 22
Thank you for clearing that up....
I thought everyone (as in world wide) knew what the “Man Flu” is.
It’s a cold!

Gah!!!
 
Reactions: 12
Karen Petrie
1 year ago
Ohhhhh yessssss!!! I could listen all day.

REPLY

Addison Mullen
47 minutes ago
Did you time travel to comment...1y ago...?



Karen Petrie

This is Karen Cbomb.
www.chateauxchronicles.com
 
Reactions: 15
Absolutely, quite obvious from the beginning from the state of the shitoo and grounds. The first time I saw it beyond appalled. All rooms musty and dirty the pretend tennis court overgrown and nasty. The kitchen = appalling, everything is pretentious in this misfit cult only several things are cemented in this lot grifting, drinking, laziness and swapping partners.
 
Reactions: 12
...can only imagine what the lawyer/s thought after she brought this ridiculous picture to him/her...hope they at least got a decent hourly rate for this nonsense.

...parody and satire are rarely defamatory, and both are legal in the US. ...she would have to prove she was materially or financially harmed or that her personal reputation has/had been maligned or slandered. ...Not an easy task...and costly.

...most reasonable people...and the court...would see this as humor...tasteless, but funny...clearly a silly joke and therefore, not a legal issue.

...in fact...the more outrageous the material...the better...leaves no question regarding intent...and if in ‘any doubt’ or thought to have merit...add a disclaimer...

...sj is basically...an idiot...
 
Reactions: 18
REPLY
@billybudd I nominated the quote as a thread title that @OneMoonbeam quoted in a post. I'm sure it was a lighthearted quote.
I thought, and still do, it would make an excellant thread title. I do not recogonise myself in any of your explanation for the term 'woke'.
As to 'grannies', come on, the term is always being quoted on here.
I cannot speak for @OneMoonbeam, but I think that maybe on this occasion, you are seeing offence where no offence was intended or exists. Your explanation of the term'woke' is how you view it. I don't.
Let's agree to disagree.
 
Reactions: 17
The flying monkeys are trying their hardest!
 
Reactions: 6
Rewatching that vlog from May 15, 2020, that @KiKiGee posted.

Gosh what a difference 2 years make. I remember when I first watched that vlog that mainly I was in awe and admiration of Fanny and mummeee dear because of how agile and how nimble they were, going up into those attics.
Now all I see is the literal shit that covers everything and unsurprisingly 2 years on from Fanny gushing and rhapsodising over her plans to utilise all that she hoards, nothing has changed. There has been no movement and as of yet v little improvement to these areas. I know I’ll never be rich as I tend to get rid of anything I don’t need and try not to keep it for a just in case situation but come on 90% of the crap she was exposing should have been binned or disposed of appropriately and not stored and forgotten about. What a tip.
 
Reactions: 20
Let me define her spectrum = Money, Money, Money
 
Reactions: 21
I did not take offense at you and meant to give none.
I respectfully explained the reasons for my disagreement with the nomination. I won't go over the explanation again, but I stand by every word of it. "Woke" is and is meant to be fighting words.

The flying monkeys are trying their hardest!
Perhaps I do not make myself clear.
The flying monkeys have nothing to do with this. If they exist.
 
Reactions: 7
I've always thought the high tier patrons are very ordinary middle class women and gay men needing a boost in their social contacts. They are buying a parasocial fake friendship. It's transactional to give Fanny money so you can call her a 'friend' and expect her to answer their every email, their gifts to be opened in due time, reserve a room for them when they want to come (in case of Jason Dubey even when nobody's home, but as a high tier patron he feels entitled to come anyway). These entitled Hyacinth Bucket's of North America who by accident and terrible injustice of life live amongst common people, have only common friends and live in common houses with their common families. They were born to a different life!

I can imagine the boasting how they're just got an email or are going to visit a dear friend, Lady Stephanie, and stay in her chateau (and understand how much she loaths them, basically giving them a finger in every possible turn.)

Some of them are clear narcs themselves asserting power over Fanny, we pay you jump -mentality, how many times we've read:
"I'm a high tier patron, why Nati isn't answering my emails?"
"I'm a high tier patron, I'm going to sort this out and call Stephanie."
"I'm a high tier patron, I demand an explanation."
"Did you see me?"
These people don't want to lose their faces, they suck it up when Fanny doesn't obey them.

But most of them are just people who in the back of their minds know they bring nothing to the table and would never get acquainted with people like her without a monthly donation. This is their only change to mingle with 'the upper echelon' people, which is a scam, real upper echelon people don't operate this way, but it's as close as they can get so they'll take it.
 
Reactions: 40
A process of osmosis. In a nutshell, SJ is human litmus paper, soaking up and absorbing the personalities of those around her.
 
Reactions: 12
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.