Frenchessence Post 3663804 I've been thinking (or as Dear Brenda would say - I've been a tinkin' and a tinkin') - with over 40 years of dealing with Family Trusts, property trusts, debt structure and tax shelters, I reckon Mummy and Daddy bank rolled her original purchase of the share of lalaland with a proviso that accommodation for them would be provided/apartment created "in the future" when needed, but then Daddy died. She probably had Daddy wound around her little finger and her future plans were to pay up to Daddy and have Daddy look the other way when money was discussed. But when he died Mummy solely controlled the family fortune and of course Mummy can't be manipulated like Daddy. There is a definite frisson of tension between them and SJ's ott exhibitions of concern for Mummy every time a raindrop falls on her head, do not ring true. But she has to keep Mummy happy or Mummy may start looking at the Trust structure. So I reckon Mummy has a tight rein on the purse strings and the rule is "you got $$X for the purchase on the basis you had to make a go of it and the chateau has to self fund all expenses, renovations etc in the future" From the sound of it Grandmere was very elderly when she died - Isabelle is 80 and even if her mother was 16 - 18 when she married and had Isabelle (they married very young in those days) it sounds like she was in her mid to late 90's when she dies - so Isabelle has good genes, is mentally astute and is extremely fit when she's running around the garden, climbing into old bread ovens etc. SJ could be waiting a long, long time before fiscal security kicks in and even then Mummy could leave the family $$ tied up in trusts for quite a while - In the meantime she's seen how easy it is for the Patron money to keep rolling in and she's hooked on it and drawing others like MPK into her spider's web 'cos if everybody's doing it, it takes the heat off her and she looks squeaky clean and just taking care of renovations and keeping the promises she's made to the Patrons.Is it possible that Gerrys house, which I think I heard said is ‘next to Isabelles’ house in Framingham, is owned by the Jarvis family (or a ‘trust’) that will ultimately revert or be inherited by LOTL ? That woman is sitting on millions of pounds of assets no matter which way you look at it.
** play up not pay upFrenchessence Post 3663804 I've been thinking (or as Dear Brenda would say - I've been a tinkin' and a tinkin') - with over 40 years of dealing with Family Trusts, property trusts, debt structure and tax shelters, I reckon Mummy and Daddy bank rolled her original purchase of the share of lalaland with a proviso that accommodation for them would be provided/apartment created "in the future" when needed, but then Daddy died. She probably had Daddy wound around her little finger and her future plans were to pay** up to Daddy and have Daddy look the other way when money was discussed. But when he died Mummy solely controlled the family fortune and of course Mummy can't be manipulated like Daddy. There is a definite frisson of tension between them and SJ's ott exhibitions of concern for Mummy every time a raindrop falls on her head, do not ring true. But she has to keep Mummy happy or Mummy may start looking at the Trust structure. So I reckon Mummy has a tight rein on the purse strings and the rule is "you got $$X for the purchase on the basis you had to make a go of it and the chateau has to self fund all expenses, renovations etc in the future" From the sound of it Grandmere was very elderly when she died - Isabelle is 80 and even if her mother was 16 - 18 when she married and had Isabelle (they married very young in those days) it sounds like she was in her mid to late 90's when she dies - so Isabelle has good genes, is mentally astute and is extremely fit when she's running around the garden, climbing into old bread ovens etc. SJ could be waiting a long, long time before fiscal security kicks in and even then Mummy could leave the family $$ tied up in trusts for quite a while - In the meantime she's seen how easy it is for the Patron money to keep rolling in and she's hooked on it and drawing others like MPK into her spider's web 'cos if everybody's doing it, it takes the heat off her and she looks squeaky clean and just taking care of renovations and keeping the promises she's made to the Patrons.
Strange isn't it. I suppose they can only control their own socual media.Still lots of comments on YouTube.
Oh, you're the one getting it. SJ, on the other hand...Or am I just not getting it?
Exactly. Coming from a family of diagnosed celiacs you can't even share a toaster (ie gluten free bread). Everything kept seperate. It's a choice at La La Land, which is fine, however it is expensive. I would have thought as BJJ has extreme allergies he would be self sufficent in cooking for himself.I’m concerned about cross contamination in that kitchen!
Hahaha I thought of that other sun gazing where you are naked and on your back outside and you grab your feet in your hands and pull your legs back so your anus can absorb the sun lolI know this is off topic but I'm new here so haven't figured everything out. I was reading through some of the old threads and the mysterious Mason popped up a few times. I have always wondered about him. When one of the posts mentioned he was a sun gazer I just had to look that up. Sure enough this is what I found written about him: "Mason Howe Dwinell is one of the most seriously crazy people in the US, and imagine the competition for that title! Dwinell is an acupuncturist, though more notably he is perhaps the US’s most prominent promoter of … sungazing, the seriously crazy and appallingly dangerous idea that humans can absorb the sun's energy directly and efficiently through their eyes by staring into the sun for extended periods of time." It all makes sense now! SJ attracts some real loons probably because she is one herself!
I don't watch D&A at all, I only know she has red hair, but I believe it was like this:Wow, only go offline for 36hours and so much to catch up on!
One little bit to add re MP saga. He states they’re his designs (which I do not doubt) but where did the ideas come from? If the whole idea for the designs were not his does he ‘own them’? Did he just merely draw another persons vision.
Compare it to say the Beatles (you all know the Beatles). They had the ‘idea’ for their music (and words) but what if they couldn’t write the music down and someone else wrote it down for them? Who does it belong to?
nothing is off topic if it concerns SJI know this is off topic but I'm new here so haven't figured everything out. I was reading through some of the old threads and the mysterious Mason popped up a few times. I have always wondered about him. When one of the posts mentioned he was a sun gazer I just had to look that up. Sure enough this is what I found written about him: "Mason Howe Dwinell is one of the most seriously crazy people in the US, and imagine the competition for that title! Dwinell is an acupuncturist, though more notably he is perhaps the US’s most prominent promoter of … sungazing, the seriously crazy and appallingly dangerous idea that humans can absorb the sun's energy directly and efficiently through their eyes by staring into the sun for extended periods of time." It all makes sense now! SJ attracts some real loons probably because she is one herself!
I think there is a lot of merit in what you are suggesting. I could never understand IJ's role in major decisions or SJ seeking her opinion or defering to what IJ says. I thought it was a security thing as Nic & MP aren't there and she trusts her mum. However it would make sense if mummy controls release of funds or an allowance. Watch vlog 36. Massive cleanup if outbuildings SJ's delight and gratitude is very sincere. Also it would explain her "bossiness".Frenchessence Post 3663804 I've been thinking (or as Dear Brenda would say - I've been a tinkin' and a tinkin') - with over 40 years of dealing with Family Trusts, property trusts, debt structure and tax shelters, I reckon Mummy and Daddy bank rolled her original purchase of the share of lalaland with a proviso that accommodation for them would be provided/apartment created "in the future" when needed, but then Daddy died. She probably had Daddy wound around her little finger and her future plans were to pay up to Daddy and have Daddy look the other way when money was discussed. But when he died Mummy solely controlled the family fortune and of course Mummy can't be manipulated like Daddy. There is a definite frisson of tension between them and SJ's ott exhibitions of concern for Mummy every time a raindrop falls on her head, do not ring true. But she has to keep Mummy happy or Mummy may start looking at the Trust structure. So I reckon Mummy has a tight rein on the purse strings and the rule is "you got $$X for the purchase on the basis you had to make a go of it and the chateau has to self fund all expenses, renovations etc in the future" From the sound of it Grandmere was very elderly when she died - Isabelle is 80 and even if her mother was 16 - 18 when she married and had Isabelle (they married very young in those days) it sounds like she was in her mid to late 90's when she dies - so Isabelle has good genes, is mentally astute and is extremely fit when she's running around the garden, climbing into old bread ovens etc. SJ could be waiting a long, long time before fiscal security kicks in and even then Mummy could leave the family $$ tied up in trusts for quite a while - In the meantime she's seen how easy it is for the Patron money to keep rolling in and she's hooked on it and drawing others like MPK into her spider's web 'cos if everybody's doing it, it takes the heat off her and she looks squeaky clean and just taking care of renovations and keeping the promises she's made to the Patrons.
** play up not pay up
Haha, SJ has no problems with D and A, why would she? She wants to appear in the next season again.Well as many has pointed out, she never stated anything about Dick & Angel. Rather she was pointing fingers at Tattle.Life, probably hoping some of the more devoted fans would take jabs at all of us. Yet, curiously no superfan has entered - as far as I know - only people who were critical of SJ & MPK have come and found a space to vent...
Is this from Kamasutra?Hahaha I thought of that other sun gazing where you are naked and on your back outside and you grab your feet in your hands and pull your legs back so your anus can absorb the sun lol
Yeah, but you remember how hard it was for him to buy (and pay) the stamps for the Xmas cards? Imagine wrapping up mugsLook MP is not that naive he was advertising a game June's Journey.
One quote I just searched. To test market. Putting that christmas card of the kitchen on 100 mugs would cost USD1200. Sell them for USD25 postage sep; cost each nets USD2500, profit 1300. It is not that bloody difficult
It's just all so embarrassing, isn't it?Can I just say, after watching but not watching Sadie Trotters latest attempt to grandeur, I feel for SJ, having put al her cards in the apparent wrong place. I get it why she's not supporting that family any longer....
Groan.... I might now have to watch/not watch just to see this...Can I just say, after watching but not watching Sadie Trotters latest attempt to grandeur, I feel for SJ, having put al her cards in the apparent wrong place. I get it why she's not supporting that family any longer....
If I had that many allergies I wouldn’t let anyone touch my food!Exactly. Coming from a family of diagnosed celiacs you can't even share a toaster (ie gluten free bread). Everything kept seperate. It's a choice at La La Land, which is fine, however it is expensive. I would have thought as BJJ has extreme allergies he would be self sufficent in cooking for himself.
Maybe a bit off-topic. Sadie lives in the original stables, for a family who loves horses (and presumably owned them), why didn't they keep the stables as they were and bought a pair of horses... there is money to be made from horses.Can I just say, after watching but not watching Sadie Trotters latest attempt to grandeur, I feel for SJ, having put al her cards in the apparent wrong place. I get it why she's not supporting that family any longer....
I am tired, too. I wonder why she does not focus on the loo. Showing all the litte bits is not fun. Before she would finish a project , film it and show the process.was so surprised by this week's patreon video! the updates SJ showed should've been in the CD videos! I miss the progress from over the summer :/ they found fossils in one of the stone slabs!
also very tired of the dinners and parties - new to tattle but glad I am not alone in feeling like this
I just watched if you can call it that as finger rapidly tapping screen to fast forward - Jesus crying out loud really? Really? Vlog 4 and it’s Sadie playing with the dogs and shopping in the supermarket. My head is exploding at the absolute banality of it and people LIKE it and comment???? What is wrong with people. I did stop and watch when I saw her fondling a tin of tea... and guess what... she’s started her begging campaign - paraphrasing here but something like “Sadly I don’t have any fancy cups like Michael has, sadly no Spode here, (uses sadly twice just in case the gullibles missed it the first time) and Michael has lent me his tea strainer“ (close up of silver tea strainer)... As the title here goes, Carry On Grifting!Can I just say, after watching but not watching Sadie Trotters latest attempt to grandeur, I feel for SJ, having put al her cards in the apparent wrong place. I get it why she's not supporting that family any longer....
Her lovely husband is also a professional film maker , hence the high quality vlog right from the get go .You have found the real reason for SJ’s visit, who is always looking for talented people to ‘befriend’, so she can wheel in free stuff through her charm. Of course she’s bringing the free workforce, the minions/slaves she thoroughly corrupted before by promises of entourage benefits. Hope the couple sees throug the cheap con quickly!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?