Take a look at flower Marie's blog. One of them is all about how wonderful SJ is.
Agreed. Selmar was quite shirty with one poster who suggested some improvements to his nativity scene build. Blunt words to the effect that he liked it as it was.
Take a look at flower Marie's blog. One of them is all about how wonderful SJ is.the many volunteers( thats what amazes me the most you never see/hear of any either praising her or putting her down I find that strange)
Agreed. Selmar was quite shirty with one poster who suggested some improvements to his nativity scene build. Blunt words to the effect that he liked it as it was.Lonely wolf used to deal with his problems with himself
11/10 response @Clara Burnett@Julie Sue I did a little investigation myself and you are not only a new member but the 10 messages you posted were all about your doubts about me and my information. Now who needs to be suspicious?
Stephanie it’s yourself.....Having looked at the recent blogs (that include the concerns and medication regarding mental health) I have little doubt that they would also be contentious mention any homophobic attack that has been alleged by one person. So far no further detail of the alleged attack is evident from the ‘friends’ blogs and the CD vlogs appear very welcoming for any person regardless of orientation, gender or lifestyle choices.
so far tattlers have provided ‘evidence’ from public sources, therefore, fair use and considered accurate and reasonable to debate upon. Running round in discussion circles regarding what one person has mentioned with no further evidence definitely seems out of step with the rest of the tattler ‘agent’ information. But then these are merely my own personal thoughts.
Yikes, looks like perhaps Madame Chatelaine has one of her creatures doing her bidding by sowing the seed of doubt in respect to all the new intel we’ve gathered@Julie Sue I did a little investigation myself and you are not only a new member but the 10 messages you posted were all about your doubts about me and my information. Now who needs to be suspicious?
Again, this is all a bit too fishy. Not much of a personal thought in there, so I guess SJ has send out her knights in not so shining armour?But then these are merely my own personal thoughts
Yep
Ha! Thought the same thing. Who could come up with such a moniker? BJJ is that you?@Julie Sue I did a little investigation myself and you are not only a new member but the 10 messages you posted were all about your doubts about me and my information. Now who needs to be suspicious?
Which is what I will do for sure (but not after calling out bullshit when I see it - or read it)They just ignore
Would you like a cup of teaWhich is what I will do for sure (but not after calling out bullshit when I see it - or read it)
Why not?When SJ explained that her father never revealed his interpretation of his art, as he felt it was important that the viewer made their own interpretations, he could not be thinking it would be like this...
Sorry I was referring to pre the current groupTake a look at flower Marie's blog. One of them is all about how wonderful SJ is.
Agreed. Selmar was quite shirty with one poster who suggested some improvements to his nativity scene build. Blunt words to the effect that he liked it as it was.
Oh dear I didn’t think asking for evidence and calling into question one person would create such a waveStephanie it’s yourself.....
Babes missing the point of Tattle
Observation not in yer own name .... understandable after the week you had
Here’s the thing ....
if and it’s A BIG IF
You copped whom @Clara is
Call it out on FB ...... there’s a pet
Allfiring straight from you
and readingobnoxious views
callingon YOU derailing the thread
I think you missed the couple regarding Phil and Barbie.
don’t beat yourself up about me being suspicious of you, it’s possibly just a coincidence and besides lots of other tattlers are clearly jumping to a defensive position for you. Similar I suppose to super fans!
What types of things have you said to get deleted, blocked and banned?I can answer this one... I think. So being as duplicitous as I think I am I have more than one email address - shocking yes I know. So as a “commentator” on CD vlogs under one particular name I said how it was. Never nasty or trolling, just being straight. Now on the device I used to make that comment under that name the comment would be there for me to see. HOWEVER, when I went to another device, opened YT using a different profile, clicked into CD vlog I’d commented on on previous device, the comment is not there. So on iPad as John Doe, there’s my comment. On iPhone as Jane Doe, cannot see John Doe’s comment. So I assume John Doe is blocked from commenting even though they are visible to him on device he used. Second HOWEVER.... if John Doe “replies” to someone else’s comment, that reply is visible on other devices. Seems like only the main commenting is banned but replies get through. Believe me... took me a little while to suss this out but that’s how it works. So seems Nati or whomever has the power to block/ban a commentator. I think for a while she used to just delete my comments then she went the extra mile and banned me...
No the name is from a couple of old menopausal hags, really quite bitter people, but to their credit only believe evidence based submissions.Ha! Thought the same thing. Who could come up with such a moniker? BJJ is that you?
Using the D word is most unsportingStephanie it’s yourself.....
Babes missing the point of Tattle
Observation not in yer own name .... understandable after the week you had
Here’s the thing ....
if and it’s A BIG IF
You copped whom @Clara is
Call it out on FB ...... there’s a pet
Allfiring straight from you
and readingobnoxious views
callingon YOU derailing the thread
The use of ‘babes’ is most unbecoming considering the content of your previous posts. DisappointedStephanie it’s yourself.....
Babes missing the point of Tattle
Observation not in yer own name .... understandable after the week you had
Here’s the thing ....
if and it’s A BIG IF
You copped whom @Clara is
Call it out on FB ...... there’s a pet
Allfiring straight from you
and readingobnoxious views
callingon YOU derailing the thread
I’m not apologizing for the alleged homophobia, just fishing for more detail and a rough timeline since Rosie glasses didn’t have much to offer by way of info we don’t already know.Either way it is not OK to be subjected to a homephobic attack. Isabelle's vintage, probably not terribly tolerant even though her husband painted their daughter with her tits out...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?