Only one way to find out...Hollie shaking her head that Archie needs intervention to be kept alive….
Only one way to find out...Hollie shaking her head that Archie needs intervention to be kept alive….
I can't think of any. The closest is Glass v UK where the mother's instinct was actually right and her son didn't die, she had a physical fight with the medical team as well, but the legal point was different because the hospital didn't seek a court order to withdraw treatment and basically just did it without telling her (which is not right, and shouldn't have happened). I won't link the judgment because it was an ECHR one which is dire to trawl through but this is a lay summary:Does anyone know of any cases where the parents actually won?
e.g made it all the way to surpreme/human rights and then won?
How do you know this?Looks like that weirdo who sat outside the hospital with oxygen tanks to help break out Charlie or Alfie (can’t remember which one) is there today. Because he’s part of the family now apparently.
Hollie actually posted the full hospital address for the to purposefully send them thereWhy on Earth are people sending Archie gifts to the hospital? It’s not like the staff don’t have anything better to do Of course.
Im not being funny, but I would think this was very creepy if I saw this!
I've only just started listening, heard the end of the last chap. They all sound a bit annoyed, particularly this lady? That could be my imagination.This female barrister is easier to understand! Not sure if it’s partly a microphone issue with some of the others.
He posted on the AA page that he would be at court todayHow do you know this?
I know what you mean, I’ve seen it in other court cases too so don’t think it’s specific to this one. Maybe because they are essentially ’arguing’ against each other. I think judges also lose a bit of patience if they are not making valid points or make bizarre ones, like the family’s barrister saying the judges use of the word burdensome was wrong because Archie isn’t aware/can’t feel pain.I've only just started listening, heard the end of the last chap. They all sound a bit annoyed, particularly this lady? That could be my imagination.
Burdensome to the people administering it surely? It can't be easy for those poor doctors and nurses, the abuse they are getting, not being listened to, all the while having to care for a poor boy who is literally wasting away. It's so sad for those people too.I know what you mean, I’ve seen it in other court cases too so don’t think it’s specific to this one. Maybe because they are essentially ’arguing’ against each other. I think judges also lose a bit of patience if they are not making valid points or make bizarre ones, like the family’s barrister saying the judges use of the word burdensome was wrong because Archie isn’t aware/can’t feel pain.
Yes one of the judges also said about burdonsome to nursing staff too. The female judge seemed astounded he would even argue the point on burdonsome.Burdensome to the people administering it surely? It can't be easy for those poor doctors and nurses, the abuse they are getting, not being listened to, all the while having to care for a poor boy who is literally wasting away. It's so sad for those people too.
What a tit show.Monday![]()
this is heinous. Poor Archie, his only hope of release from his hell now is a cardiac arrest.
Be nice to think the SC and ECHR could just send an email "nah, we watched the YouTube video. Not happening. No need to pack the monkey for a trip to Strasbourg."I admit I struggled to follow a lot of it but I will be really surprised if they win the permission to appeal. However even if they don’t, poor Archie will still have to suffer whilst they then go to Supreme Court and maybe ECHR too.