The following was provided to the Daily Mail last month:
This statement is provided on the express condition that it is published in its entirety, without edits, truncations, or paraphrasing. If you are unable to commit to publishing the full text, please contact before any portion of this statement is used:
First and foremost, Tattle Life wishes to express its heartfelt condolences to the family and friends of Princess Bliss Dickson.
The community on the site has long been concerned for her welfare, having seeing her publicly from a very young age.
The gross misuse of this tragedy by those with vested interest is appalling and we urge everyone look beyond the bias narrative.
Organisations such as the Samaritans advise against sensationalising a suicide or attributing it to a single cause, as this is rarely the case.
Tattle Life remains confident in its moderation processes and compliance. We welcome open conversation with any relevant authority.
It is essential for the Coroner’s office to be allowed the time and space to perform its duties thoroughly before any conclusions are drawn.
At this time, it would be inappropriate to comment further.
Today the Daily Mail have truncated this to the following, removed important parts and didn't contact tattle:
A Tattle Life spokesman said: 'First and foremost, Tattle Life wishes to express its heartfelt condolences to the family and friends of Princess Bliss Dickson. The community on the site has long been concerned for her welfare, having seeing her publicly from a very young age.
'It is essential for the Coroner’s office to be allowed the time and space to perform its duties thoroughly before any conclusions are drawn. At this time, it would be inappropriate to comment further.'
IPSO won't take action on inaccurate reporting like todays purely speculative hit piece on tattle because to investigate would be a "significant intrusion into the privacy" of the family. Which is totally understandable. But this gives the Daily Mail carte blanche to print what they like on behalf of influencers with connections and vested interests.
It's abhorrent but that is the state of the media. The Daily Mail, influencers and Labour MPs are prejudicing an inquest.
If any tattler has a good MP with integrity it might be worthwhile raising with them.
Anyone can read the threads and see tattlers were the ones showing concern over a child that had been put, without her consent, in the public eye from the age of 4
https://tattle.life/threads/sophie-may-dickson-11.51694/