there cant be any reason other than attention
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Poor child still being exploited even in her most vulnerable state
Posts are also locked after 20 mins so you can’t delete or edit them. So I don’t want to hear influencers claiming tattlers post their email publicly and then delete the posts later once everyone has screenshot it or something.
Last edited:
Daily Mirror echoing the same nonsense about Tattle
www.mirror.co.uk
Influencer mum hits back at cruelty over funeral of daughter who took own life
Sophie-May Dickson's daughter Princess died in February aged just 16 after she started receiving cruel comments on Tattle Life about her body and appearance from just 14-years-old
Daily Mirror echoing the same nonsense about Tattle
Influencer mum hits back at cruelty over funeral of daughter who took own life
Sophie-May Dickson's daughter Princess died in February aged just 16 after she started receiving cruel comments on Tattle Life about her body and appearance from just 14-years-old
Having just said goodbye to a close family member not once did it occur to me to get a camera out and photograph my last moments with them and certainly not share it online. My memories come from the conversations we had, the laughter and shared experiences. Likewise for both my parents, I can’t remember a whole lot from their funerals but I remember the times we spent together.
There is absolutely no need for photographs at funerals/in funeral homes. They should be banned. It’s distasteful
Each to their own obviously but having been to the funerals of both parents and only sibling I never want to relive any part of those occasions.
I don't want to see me and others at their worst crying and distraught. I think it's an invasion of mourners privacy.
Absolutely this. My dad's funeral over twenty years ago remains in my memory. All of the people who took time to come to be with us, and offer words of comfort. That's what stays with me, plus of course, memories of him during his life. The thought of a photographer being involved at any point, is totally abhorrent to me.
I cannot imagine what it is like for a parent to bury their child. I believe that people grieve in many many different ways. But I still cannot understand the taking of photos for social media. It seems disrespectful to the deceased, at the very least, to me.
I absolutely cannot fathom the thought process that goes into deciding to hire a photographer to take pictures of a funeral. Abhorrent IMHO. I have buried more people in my family that I care to remember and the last thing I would want to be reminded of is saying my final goodbye, you literally have to be mentally ill to want to relive that horrible moment. Just my opinion tho xx RIP Princess
As if you’d forget your last goodbyes
I’ve never known anyone that gets a professional makeover for a funeral let alone that of their child ,makeup wouldn’t be sustainable unless there’s no tears being shed( generally speaking) I remember a few years ago an American influencer got hell for posting pics of herself alongside her dad’s open casket, it’s so disrespectful to the deceased imo.
Last edited:
What is she planning on doing if it wasn’t just for social media? Printing them out and putting them up around the house? Weird behaviour.
I feel like the journalists who actually read aren't the ones writing these articles, for the most part, because the articles are a long way from reality.
And, as I've said before, it wouldn't exactly be rocket science to find my real name from this account, because I use the name elsewhere.
Not followed the Dickinsons at all, so no dog in that fight whatsoever. However - to any watching gloating red-tops, remember one thing here - at least we can say we've never hacked a dead kid's voice mail. Tbh I don't think some of you have actually stopped pulling those shenanigans. Maybe you could do something worthy - maybe some investigation into the alleged sex abuse this poor kid suffered, but it's just easier to blame sites like this, isn't it?
And in the case of the Mirror specifically, at least we never faked pictures of abuse by British soldiers.
I can vouch for this as someone who waffles, makes multiple typos, and curses every time I read one back after mu (iykyk) 20 minutes is up.
I’d never make it as an editor.
I noticed Metro published the full Tattle statement, if only the others would follow suit
Same. I've just had a funeral for my mum and there is a recording as it was streamed for people who could not make it. I was sent the recording, but there's not one bit of me that needs to see it again. It's abhorrent that anyone would feel the need to take pictures at a funeral. It's bad enough that celeb funerals are papped to the hilt.
If she was put in foster care then it's obvious that Social Workers and the courts were involved with this child. They would have extensive files on her and on the whole family. Foster care is only done when it's obvious the mother is unfit to parent. The bigger question is why they allowed her to go back to this appalling mother. A lot of people failed this girl and it wasn't the Tattlers who had no contact with her, ever, and therefore bear no responsibility whatsoever.
These MPs hate social media as they get criticised with good reason and this is their chance to 'get even' by taking down Tattle. The child's death is just the smokescreen they were looking for. As for 'the worst tattle said was talking about her being too young to have her lips injected and that some of her clothes weren't appropriate' but there's nothing wrong with saying any of that. It shows normal concern that those in authority didn't have. Safeguarding is everyone's business and you don't have to apologise for being concerned about a child.
Below are the rules for a Child Death Review and there are procedures to follow in these cases. It's not trial by Daily Mail scumbag journalists of all people! It mentions the role of 'bullying, including on-line bullying' as a factor to consider but no screenshots of bullying of the child by Tattle has ever been captured. The mother and Social Workers are the ones who should be worried, not us.
Last edited:
It’s annoying but I actually think the Mail publishing any part of the Tattlelife statement is a win. Tattle has hardly ever got a right of reply published apart from the one Loose Women? reply.
It’s going to drive traffic and that will open peoples eyes.
The Mail are also feasting on the clicks that Sophie’s behaviour will bring. Sophie and Dr Jess Tail-teller should be worried. The press will happily do a 180 and turn on them at some point.
It’s going to drive traffic and that will open peoples eyes.
The Mail are also feasting on the clicks that Sophie’s behaviour will bring. Sophie and Dr Jess Tail-teller should be worried. The press will happily do a 180 and turn on them at some point.
I have no idea what's happened or who this poor girl was.
However you'd hope that any involved in this are squeaky clean, can back everything up with evidence and have their houses in order.
Becky Vardy is a prime example of instigating legal action and subsequently being hung out to dry (plus court costs)
However you'd hope that any involved in this are squeaky clean, can back everything up with evidence and have their houses in order.
Becky Vardy is a prime example of instigating legal action and subsequently being hung out to dry (plus court costs)
I've tried to comment on the article several times today, basically saying the comments on Tattle are no worse than the comment section of the DM, or maybe not post your private life all over social media if you don't want anyone to comment, or maybe keep it set at private and not one comment has been published!