If her mother still sticks to this version of events they’ll probably be three barristers present, one for the coroner, one for the family, one for Tattle, the family can always request a jury present also , they won’t get a payout from an inquest it’ll only be to determine a cause of death.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I don't think most people bother to read to find the truth. They listen to people like LG who says tattle is full of NHS medical records released, mortgage documents posted, grape threats, going through bins etc which there is no evidence ever happening cause she made it up.
LG is the biggest stalking harasser going with the Walkers and their children. Even asking a neighbour to record them over the fence, and still get's confused with the one from TOWIE! Drives 13+ hour round trip just to get some photos to taunt the Walkers.
‘would not have’ not of, that bugs me so much! We did take some photos at my Dads recent funeral but only of the transport he arrived in because that was something very unique and there were family who couldn’t attend who wanted to see it.
No MP is going to support Tattle because Tattle calls out/exposes morally ambiguous / downright shady behaviours - show me an MP who isn’t both? They want to close down a site that could potentially shine a light on their behaviours.
I’ve had to look up who this all was about and I think that there ought to be more of a light shone on the parenting style here by the people wanting to protect kids from tattle. I’m no expert but I can’t imagine taking kids for spray tans as small children and making the sole focus on the child about their physical appearance, is healthy in any way. Promote good hygiene obviously but the pushing of an aesthetic here is gross to me. That poor child.
I’ve been to a lot of funerals for both young and old people, some were even live streamed on PRIVATE websites for those who couldn’t attend (need a log in and password to access) and never once did I or anyone I know ask for those live streams to be saved to re watch, I don’t want to remember a single one of the funerals I’ve been to as they were all traumatic
I posted a comment on the Daily Mail article yesterday sticking up for Tattle and it's been removed.
I dont follow any influencers and the ones who use their children as content to monetise i find particularly off putting.
Instead, what I found was a community of people who catalogued the uploads of people who choose to put themselves in the public eye and choose to upload their own content.
You hold those people and fellow tattlers to account. You fact-check rumour and fake articles that others post. You show concern for children who do not choose to be in the public eye. You are quick to flag if someone did post details that an influencer themselves did not post. Ive even seen where an influencer did post their home address publicly themselves and collectively refuse to repost it here to save them from their own actions.
But what you do best is track the lies and inconsistencies of public figures, and have long memories and receipts. Thats why they hate this site.
I came here from the site for mums. Tattle was mentioned as this terrible place prolific with trolls stalkers and liars. I wanted to see what could be worse than the site for mum's.
Instead, what I found was a community of people who catalogued the uploads of people who choose to put themselves in the public eye and choose to upload their own content.
You hold those people and fellow tattlers to account. You fact-check rumour and fake articles that others post. You show concern for children who do not choose to be in the public eye. You are quick to flag if someone did post details that an influencer themselves did not post. Ive even seen where an influencer did post their home address publicly themselves and collectively refuse to repost it here to save them from their own actions.
But what you do best is track the lies and inconsistencies of public figures, and have long memories and receipts. Thats why they hate this site.
One thing about tattle is everything comes with receipts. Just got to look at peoples wikis to know that, someone needs to make a wiki of SMD really might do it while the children are at their fathers
The Daily Fails agenda as a publication is riling up all the poor plebs in the nation to believe that the reason they're not slightly richer than they are is another pleb whose even poorer than them.
Influencers are gold to them because the *often fake* lifestyle they display is like catnip for the daily mail as it makes the poor plebs they're riling up, long for the "rich" lifestyle even more and get even more reticent at people who they are told are getting in the way of them achieving it.
So they have every reason to want this site taken off the web, given that the truth of the extent of the smoke and mirrors is here for all to see
I think the coroner would want to see some evidence before calling Tattlelife to attend.
Many Coroners are lawyers and barristers (more often than medical background) so I’d expect a certain level of due diligence. It’s a website, if they can’t even produce some screenshots it’s not going to be taken very seriously that it’s a main contributor. I think due to the SS involvement and possibly family court there might be some restrictions on what is reported.
Many Coroners are lawyers and barristers (more often than medical background) so I’d expect a certain level of due diligence. It’s a website, if they can’t even produce some screenshots it’s not going to be taken very seriously that it’s a main contributor. I think due to the SS involvement and possibly family court there might be some restrictions on what is reported.
Last edited:
I came across an article on it earlier on FB. I can’t find the link to the girls thread on here but I don’t think people know the difference between having an opinion on someone and straight up trolling/bullying. The only way you can see what people are saying about you on tattle is going and looking for it yourself. If anyone was directly messaging the girl i dont agree with that and wouldn’t think it would have been anybody from here. I’ve never taken anything off here or messaged anybody directly as it should be kept on here. As others have said don’t post your life so publicly if you don’t want people having opinions on it.
There was an inquest in 2022 for a girl called Molly Russell, where the Coroner called a rep from Meta to give evidence.
She had viewed and saved graphic and disturbing self-harm content from Insta before she took her life. There was a lot of evidence of what she’d viewed and her secret twitter account.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-62998484#:~:text=Mr%20Sanders%20drew%20the%20witness's,we%20talk%20about%20with%20them.%22&text=Earlier%2C%20the%20inquest%20was%20shown,via%20the%20BBC%20Action%20Line.
She had viewed and saved graphic and disturbing self-harm content from Insta before she took her life. There was a lot of evidence of what she’d viewed and her secret twitter account.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-62998484#:~:text=Mr%20Sanders%20drew%20the%20witness's,we%20talk%20about%20with%20them.%22&text=Earlier%2C%20the%20inquest%20was%20shown,via%20the%20BBC%20Action%20Line.
Generally coroner's officers, who are often police civilian staff, investigate the death on the coroner's behalf. In an average suicide (horrible way to put it but I've seen far too many cases), there would be: witness statements from the person(s) who found the body and from the person(s) who last saw the deceased alive;
Statements from the police officers attending the scene;
Reports from the deceased's GP;
Confirmation of whether the deceased was open to any mental health or addiction services when they died, and reports and records from those services if so;
a post-mortem report written by the pathologist;
a toxicology report giving the results of drug and alcohol tests on the body;
Sometimes a family statement giving a background of the deceased's life (if not already covered in the witness statements)
In a child's suicide, the coroner will also generally request a report from their school or college, and records and a report from any social care involvement (children's services, safeguarding, fostering, etc). On top of that, in any suicide inquest, if the family is insistent that someone or something has influenced the child to take their own life, the coroner may direct her officers that statements should be taken, reports requested and evidence gathered. The coroner will then review the evidence and decide who to call to the inquest hearing to answer questions.
It should be remembered that an inquest is an inquisitorial hearing aimed at determining 'the means by which the deceased came by their death'. A coroner cannot find a person or organisation 'guilty' of causing a death, although they can indicate in their conclusion if they feel something more than minimally contributed to the death.
Inquests are public hearings because, in law, the dead have no right to privacy. However, the coroner can request the press to exercise caution in reporting if there is another minor related to the case who would be readily identifiable (which would be a bit of a nonsense in this case, in my opinion, because both girls are readily identifiable through their mother's actions)
Considering the rampant racism and misogyny they allow in the comments there deleting this is ridiculous
Mass villification of minorities and benefit claimants is what they want lol, to do that they need "influencers" wafting the carrot of their brand new range rover
I thought this could be the case as I haven’t seen one negative comment about Sophie.
The metro (owned by the mail) isn't using North Korean censorship and this is what people really think
Comments on irish news outlets don’t seem to be falling for the narrative thankfully