ASA guidelines.
So they should’ve been declared by all of the above.I gave Susie a pair when I started last year and Emily and Karina model the seasons edit so they were free in exchange for pictures I could use. All others have been bought by them
Thanks for this.....lot of naughty instagrammers out there isnt thereSo they should’ve been declared by all of the above.
Those are #Ads. And for transparency any further posts with your items in should be marked as “previously worked with” or similar so that everyone is aware.
Vixmeldrew explains it better than me:
View attachment 246088
View attachment 246089
I really recommend following someone like Vixmeldrew or similar who gives excellent advice on stuff like this. From ads to curating your feed to ... everything really. There are a few others I follow but I find Vix to be clear and concise.So they should be putting #gifted on the ones they got for free is how I'm reading that? I shall chat to everyone I work with to check they are all aware of the guidelines.
This is all correct xI don't understand all this ista influencer shite...so.... If someone was given a product for free and posted it they'd have to tag #gifted?
If someone is paid to promote the product its #ad?
Or if they promote a product and gain money from swipe ups etc is it #affiliate?
Just so I can get this straight
Yes if they were gifted and promoted it needs to state gifted in their online description.So they should be putting #gifted on the ones they got for free is how I'm reading that? I shall chat to everyone I work with to check they are all aware of the guidelines.
Apologies if it came across that I doubted your products, good luck with your business. Looks like its becoming very popular!So just thought I'd reply as I am Kerry from Trend Tonic and don't like seeing my business slated. I hand make everything, Ali express is known for ripping off others brands but what your screenshot from my website is a lightning bolt which many brands do and I haven't claimed as unique. All my items are made from cork leather which is sustainable and I have a tree planted for every pair bought. I did the seasons edit with Emily as a Collaboration which is why she's 'plastered' all over the website and this has never been hidden. I was colour trained by colour me beautiful a completely seperate business to Susie and I offered her the patreon discount as a business move because it's where my customers are based. Just like I have discounts on other style pages and stylists newsletters etc. A lot of the ladies on the new group wear my earrings which I'm extremely proud and has nothing to do with being affiliated with anyone and more to do with the fact I've spent ages learning how to make bloody good earringsI think I've covered everything but I'm open and happy to answer any other questions
Thank for this derailing the thread slightly but where do things where somebody has (more than likely) gifted an item to somebody and then themselves or somebody else post pictures ‘wow here is ‘such and such’ in our product’ should they be declaring then that they are gifted items and do FB groups count as should ADs and gifts be declared in groups?So they should’ve been declared by all of the above.
Those are #Ads. And for transparency any further posts with your items in should be marked as “previously worked with” or similar so that everyone is aware.
Vixmeldrew explains it better than me:
View attachment 246088
View attachment 246089
How do you know they don’t? If they are registered to affiliate programs such as rstyle, like to know etc. Then each time they refer or someone clicks a link it’s pennies in their pockets. Just Cos you don’t give them money directly doesn’t mean they can’t still make money from your itemsJust reread your post, they don't make any money from recommending me?
That’s an obvious ad? ‘Free in exhange for’I gave Susie a pair when I started last year and Emily and Karina model the seasons edit so they were free in exchange for pictures I could use. All others have been bought by them
Yes that is also an ad - eg in the Mrs hinch world, ppl who had gifted her stuff often screenshot and reposted pics if she wore/used something they gave her (as she didn’t seem to acknowledge the companyThank for this derailing the thread slightly but where do things where somebody has (more than likely) gifted an item to somebody and then themselves or somebody else post pictures ‘wow here is ‘such and such’ in our product’ should they be declaring then that they are gifted items and do FB groups count as should ADs and gifts be declared in groups?
Im not having a go, sorry if it comes across like that! I am just saying that even if you are being clear and transparent doesn’t mean that others areI'm not on rstyle or like to know and neither are the people that have my earrings. I was stating that I don't personally pay anyone to wear my products. I am looking more into ASA guidelines now, I'm happy to admit as a human mistakes are made especially when starting out but equally I am not in control of others social posts.
Ads should be declared on all social media platforms as I understand it.Thank for this derailing the thread slightly but where do things where somebody has (more than likely) gifted an item to somebody and then themselves or somebody else post pictures ‘wow here is ‘such and such’ in our product’ should they be declaring then that they are gifted items and do FB groups count as should ADs and gifts be declared in groups?
I agree it’s for the instagrammers to do but the company gifting should also know about the rules and if they go on to use pics etc then they can mark as ‘gifted items in shot’ or something. I’ve seen people do that.Apologies if I’ve got this wrong, but surely it’s the influencers, i.e. SBS and the stylists who should be making the declarations and they are at fault if they fail to do so rather than Trend Tonic?
If TT have stated it’s a collab but the stylist has not, again surely TT are not at fault?
Surely the onus is on the recipient to declare a gift rather than the company giving it?
I may be wrong but that was my interpretation of “the rules” so, if this is the case, then it’s unfair to blame TT for something the “influencers” are failing to do.
Oh wow! Seems there are several then. Still interested in how the lady who posted about it on here knew, wondering if she is a friend of susies but trying to warn peopleSomeone on MN has also been sent a threatening email from SBS
#Ritaisafterafreebie!I actually like your earrings btwjust sayin!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?