Southport Attacks and Aftermath #4

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
No, we must let gullible ignorant people dictate everything.

After all, that's what led to people kicking off outside a mosque in Southport.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 5
Ah but you have to remember this is 'just a gossip forum' and as such we only have to come up with simplistic ideas about what we 'want', without any thought to whether it's even possible let alone any consideration of how it would work, what the consequences might be, acknowledgement of the current situation and definitely no attempt at understanding the complexities or nuances of the situation. After all it's not our job to come up with policies and solutions. We just bleat about things we don't like and it's up to the government to make them go away. And there's always the threat of more riots to keep their minds on the job.
By that token the whole of UK are thick only for a chosen few on this thread 🤣 referendums happen in many countries for many reasons maybe you should look further than the front lawn every now and then .
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
By that token the whole of UK are thick only for a chosen few on this thread 🤣 referendums happen in many countries for many reasons maybe you should look further than the front lawn every now and then .
Yeh, we should possibly do away with democracy altogether, or obviously exclude the numpties who don’t agree with some.
Shall we have a referendum to decide the criteria for who’s too thick and disagreeable to vote? How will we word that one?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 4
Yeh, we should possibly do away with democracy altogether, or obviously exclude the numpties who don’t agree with some.
Shall we have a referendum to decide the criteria for who’s to thick and disagreeable to vote? How will we word that one?
*too thick
(Sorry I could not resist) 😂

Please can someone set up a new thread...I am clearly a thicko who can not 😂
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 3
By that token the whole of UK are thick only for a chosen few on this thread 🤣 referendums happen in many countries for many reasons maybe you should look further than the front lawn every now and then .
Representative democracy is superior in almost all circumstances.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 2
*too thick
(Sorry I could not resist) 😂

Please can someone set up a new thread...I am clearly a thicko who can not 😂
I think it’s probably a good idea not to bother.
It’s just dissolved into unproductive and unpleasant name calling, which is kind of pointless.
 
  • Sad
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Yeh, we should possibly do away with democracy altogether, or obviously exclude the numpties who don’t agree with some.
Shall we have a referendum to decide the criteria for who’s too thick and disagreeable to vote? How will we word that one?
You do realise referendums aren't the only form of democracy.

Honestly it's like us saying a surgeon is best placed to perform an operation and you turning around and saying "do you think a random member of the public is too thick to do it? Maybe we shouldn't operate on anyone ever if a member of the public can't rock up to perform a surgical procedure."
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Is direct democracy always a good idea when the majority of people are ill informed about the issues they're voting on?

I know people who voted for Brexit because they didn't like the ECHR 🤦‍♀️.

I think direct democracy is a bad idea and we shouldn't be asking the general population to vote on things they have absolutely no idea on.
I don’t think you can be responsible for what other people are informed on, people vote for whatever reasons they wish to or for whatever they believe in and that is a benefit of living somewhere that allows you that privilege.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 5
You do realise referendums aren't the only form of democracy.

Honestly it's like us saying a surgeon is best placed to perform an operation and you turning around and saying "do you think a random member of the public is too thick to do it? Maybe we shouldn't operate on anyone ever if a member of the public can't rock up to perform a surgical procedure."
Oh gosh, no of course I didn’t. I’m so glad you had to lower yourself to point out that obvious fact to me.
Look luv, we live in a democracy, so get over it.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Yeh, we should possibly do away with democracy altogether, or obviously exclude the numpties who don’t agree with some.
Shall we have a referendum to decide the criteria for who’s to thick and disagreeable to vote? How will we word that one?
No point paying MP salaries when the experts are on Tattle 😂 I guess the referendum could only be open to Guardian subscribers 🙃
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
You do realise referendums aren't the only form of democracy.

Honestly it's like us saying a surgeon is best placed to perform an operation and you turning around and saying "do you think a random member of the public is too thick to do it? Maybe we shouldn't operate on anyone ever if a member of the public can't rock up to perform a surgical procedure."
What a ridiculous analogy that is..

Voting is not a skill, there are smart people who have awful political views, just like there are thick people who do.

or are you in favour of an apititude test, because then we may actually agree? 😂😂
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 2
Is direct democracy always a good idea when the majority of people are ill informed about the issues they're voting on?

I know people who voted for Brexit because they didn't like the ECHR 🤦‍♀️.

I think direct democracy is a bad idea and we shouldn't be asking the general population to vote on things they have absolutely no idea on.
What system do you think would be better than democracy? 🤔
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Ffs they clearly meant ‘representative democracy’ like we have now is better than ‘direct democracy’, which is all decisions by referenda / plebiscite. I agree this thread isn’t very productive now with the tit for tat
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
Ffs they clearly meant ‘representative democracy’ like we have now is better than ‘direct democracy’, which is all decisions by referenda / plebiscite. I agree this thread isn’t very productive now with the tit for tat
~ I think the democracy we currently participate in is the best one

~ OOOOOO WHY DO YOU HATE DEMOCRACY????
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Not the be-all , it’s why we’re lucky enough to live in a democracy , referendum shouldn’t be a scary word .
There was
Not the be-all , it’s why we’re lucky enough to live in a democracy , referendum shouldn’t be a scary word .
Ireland had referendums on abortion and marriage reforms I believe.
They both delivered quite surprising results.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
What system do you think would be better than democracy? 🤔
I said Representative.
---
What a ridiculous analogy that is..

Voting is not a skill, there are smart people who have awful political views, just like there are thick people who do.

or are you in favour of an apititude test, because then we may actually agree? 😂😂
You surely have to have some knowledge for both otherwise you end up with a shitshow.
---
Not the be-all , it’s why we’re lucky enough to live in a democracy , referendum shouldn’t be a scary word .
Representative is still a democracy.
---
Oh gosh, no of course I didn’t. I’m so glad you had to lower yourself to point out that obvious fact to me.
Look luv, we live in a democracy, so get over it.
Goodness me how patronising.

Where did I say I was above you or knew more than you did? Maybe you should remove that chip on your shoulder or stop making assumptions- as you tell everyone else here to stop doing 😂
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.