What’s that? I googled and just got air conditioner units.
What’s that? I googled and just got air conditioner units.All I can think about here is... AC12 H
she also had a thing with Ben Affleck.It was her choreographer Zane
Line of Duty ....best cop show EVERWhat’s that? I googled and just got air conditioner units.
I heard that Jessica biel is a prescription pill addict and that he does cheat all the time, mind you I have also read that she is a lesbian!Apologies if this is old news, but JT is rumoured to actually be quite the scumbag. Apparently, he cheated on Britney Spears and mistreated her a lot when they were together all those years ago. She got super upset and lonely, as you can imagine, and grew close with another guy as a result of it. In retaliation, Justin dumped her, wrote 'cry me a river' made no secret of the fact it was about her, slut-shamed her for all the press to see, and encouraged a massive slut-shaming dogpile on her. The subsequent years of shit she got from the press as a result of this played a large part in her eventual breakdown in 2007. He also supposedly cheats on Jessica Biel, or did as recently as a couple of years ago.
Again, sorry if this is already well known, I read it on a super pro-Britney twitter thread two or three years ago and fell down a bit of a rabbit hole. No smoke without fire, maybe?
First off, found this site a few weeks ago during the Ps outing and stayed, didn't think I'd have much to post let alone have my first post be about this subject but nevermind. Almost jumped in in the Watkins posts but here I am.Because paedophiles rarely operate on their own in a vacuum. They often have coconspirators - paedophile rings. A family member is a journalist and says that it’s been an open secret among journalists for years that members of the entertainment industry, the judiciary, and the royal family are all involved in child sexual abuse. But they can’t report on it because some of those involved are the people who run the media. It’s fucking rotten to the core.
I go to a regular support group for adult children of addicts and the other day, out of a group of about 20 people who spoke, 5 of them disclosed they’d been sexually abused as children. I was appalled.
It’s rife. In all walks of life. And it makes me sick.
I think they had suspicions he was inappropriate and sleazy but not to the extent of the horrors he actually did commit. Hope so anywayRe: bbc protecting employees eg David Jason.
GOOD. After thinking he’d got away with it all this time. Let’s hope it happens to all of them.
Former BBC Radio 1 DJ Michael Willis, 74, is jailed
Michael Willis was caught after police raided his yacht in Plymouth. He had previously told police in interview that he had been 'intrigued by the Jimmy Savile affair'.www.dailymail.co.uk
It’s sickening to know in hindsight that so many people knew or at least had suspicions about Jimmy Saville and yet were unable to/didn’t do anything.
There’s no way they didn’t suspect or know, otherwise why was he was *NEVER* asked to be involved in Children In Need.
Thanks so much for your insight and for all the wonderful work you do to protect children xFirst off, found this site a few weeks ago during the Ps outing and stayed, didn't think I'd have much to post let alone have my first post be about this subject but nevermind. Almost jumped in in the Watkins posts but here I am.
Sorry but these "peadophile rings" are nonsense. This is something that you hear in the press and elsewhere but most peadophiles ARE solitary, no matter the scaremongering you may hear.
My background? I have worked with a computer examination department (more recently changed to the sexier Cybercrime!). For nearly 6 years I was one.of the forensic examiners that went through computers, phones, tablets,media etc to find evidence hidden on the devices/media. These were case from DA/DV, stalking,grooming, drugs,fraud etc but almost 90-95% was indecent images of children( not child PORN, as porn is.d.esigned to titilate,.excite and arouse, IOC does none of these). There were times when weeks went by and all you had seen were nothing but "skuddy pictures" of all ages!
Peadophile rings are extremely rare. Most do not want the risk of exposure. They may come into contact with others via sharing sites and forums, but the ideas of rings of like minded individuals is one beloved by the media as it stokes our fears and plays into our love of conspiracies, but very, very rarely is accurate. Not saying they don't exist but their prevelance is often wildly overstated.
I too doubt the DJ posts on here. This is not the past, there are dedicated Public Protection Units and child protection units in UK police forces, they do not care whether you are well known, or otherwise. If there is evidence it will be investigated.
I saw someone earlier, can't remember if it was here or PS threads talking about Snapchat and how it seems to be a perfect way to hide activity. You have to remember the whole reason it exists was to allow people to sext "safely". We referred to ot as, if you excise the expression,"Snatchchat"! That is where, no matter the denials,its origins lie. Especially around teens in America, where by incidents like the 14 yo girl you sent a nudie picture to a boy was charged and convicted of distributing indecent images of a child( technically correct).
Anyway, back to the gossip, you're all doing a grand job!
You can't tidy up the outside. She's just got a good looking vag (minus the Pringle).I think it’s been tidied up by a surgeon ?!
You need to put aside a couple of days and watch Line of Duty in its entirety immediatelyWhat’s that? I googled and just got air conditioner units.
yes you can - labiaplasty. Something I never thought I would type!You can't tidy up the outside. She's just got a good looking vag (minus the Pringle).
Yes, you can, it's called a pornstar vagina, they trim away the excess bits and leave her with a barbie like fannyYou can't tidy up the outside. She's just got a good looking vag (minus the Pringle).
Also children are at more risk from people within their own family or parents friends when it come child abuse. Not necessarily from chat rooms, internet or Tik Tok - again scaremongering in the mediaFirst off, found this site a few weeks ago during the Ps outing and stayed, didn't think I'd have much to post let alone have my first post be about this subject but nevermind. Almost jumped in in the Watkins posts but here I am.
Sorry but these "peadophile rings" are nonsense. This is something that you hear in the press and elsewhere but most peadophiles ARE solitary, no matter the scaremongering you may hear.
My background? I have worked with a computer examination department (more recently changed to the sexier Cybercrime!). For nearly 6 years I was one.of the forensic examiners that went through computers, phones, tablets,media etc to find evidence hidden on the devices/media. These were case from DA/DV, stalking,grooming, drugs,fraud etc but almost 90-95% was indecent images of children( not child PORN, as porn is.d.esigned to titilate,.excite and arouse, IOC does none of these). There were times when weeks went by and all you had seen were nothing but "skuddy pictures" of all ages!
Peadophile rings are extremely rare. Most do not want the risk of exposure. They may come into contact with others via sharing sites and forums, but the ideas of rings of like minded individuals is one beloved by the media as it stokes our fears and plays into our love of conspiracies, but very, very rarely is accurate. Not saying they don't exist but their prevelance is often wildly overstated.
I too doubt the DJ posts on here. This is not the past, there are dedicated Public Protection Units and child protection units in UK police forces, they do not care whether you are well known, or otherwise. If there is evidence it will be investigated.
I saw someone earlier, can't remember if it was here or PS threads talking about Snapchat and how it seems to be a perfect way to hide activity. You have to remember the whole reason it exists was to allow people to sext "safely". We referred to ot as, if you excise the expression,"Snatchchat"! That is where, no matter the denials,its origins lie. Especially around teens in America, where by incidents like the 14 yo girl you sent a nudie picture to a boy was charged and convicted of distributing indecent images of a child( technically correct).
Anyway, back to the gossip, you're all doing a grand job!
If this is true, why can't you spell paedophile correctly?First off, found this site a few weeks ago during the Ps outing and stayed, didn't think I'd have much to post let alone have my first post be about this subject but nevermind. Almost jumped in in the Watkins posts but here I am.
Sorry but these "peadophile rings" are nonsense. This is something that you hear in the press and elsewhere but most peadophiles ARE solitary, no matter the scaremongering you may hear.
My background? I have worked with a computer examination department (more recently changed to the sexier Cybercrime!). For nearly 6 years I was one.of the forensic examiners that went through computers, phones, tablets,media etc to find evidence hidden on the devices/media. These were case from DA/DV, stalking,grooming, drugs,fraud etc but almost 90-95% was indecent images of children( not child PORN, as porn is.d.esigned to titilate,.excite and arouse, IOC does none of these). There were times when weeks went by and all you had seen were nothing but "skuddy pictures" of all ages!
Peadophile rings are extremely rare. Most do not want the risk of exposure. They may come into contact with others via sharing sites and forums, but the ideas of rings of like minded individuals is one beloved by the media as it stokes our fears and plays into our love of conspiracies, but very, very rarely is accurate. Not saying they don't exist but their prevelance is often wildly overstated.
I too doubt the DJ posts on here. This is not the past, there are dedicated Public Protection Units and child protection units in UK police forces, they do not care whether you are well known, or otherwise. If there is evidence it will be investigated.
I saw someone earlier, can't remember if it was here or PS threads talking about Snapchat and how it seems to be a perfect way to hide activity. You have to remember the whole reason it exists was to allow people to sext "safely". We referred to ot as, if you excise the expression,"Snatchchat"! That is where, no matter the denials,its origins lie. Especially around teens in America, where by incidents like the 14 yo girl you sent a nudie picture to a boy was charged and convicted of distributing indecent images of a child( technically correct).
Anyway, back to the gossip, you're all doing a grand job!
Apologies, not dyslexic, just simply made an arse of spelling. I find using a phone difficult to type with and spent half the time afterwards taking out the random fullstops and spaces and simply missed it. But thank you for pointing that out. Will do better next time it is a bug bear of mine seeing "pedophile" & focus d too mich on getting the "a" in place and as said arsed up, it happens. Rely too much on spellcheckers these days and wee never referred to them in day to day work as that, as you can imagine the chat within the department used as a defence mechanism was far courser than that used outsideIf this is true, why can't you spell paedophile correctly?
My husband has a psychology degree but can't spell psychology because he's dyslexic. Not really relevantIf this is true, why can't you spell paedophile correctly?
Cheers, should just make clear I don't do that anymore. I started a few months before my son was born, and then reached a point where I just couldn't do it any longer, and as my son grew up I wished in some ways I didn't know what was going on out there like everyone else! He'll get to do online gaming one day once he's 18!!!Thanks so much for your insight and for all the wonderful work you do to protect children x
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?