Star’s dad has a criminal record. He’s violent as well. I don’t think he’d be the most reliable witness and he didn’t bother to see Star even before SB’s involvement.I'm not necessarily saying this case specifically, but I'd like staff from the pubs maybe, impression of how the girls acted together, if FS held her own, if SB seemed controlling etc. SB's bosses, did she turn up to work how was she as an employee etc. SB family members (obvs now in this instance they didnt have much interaction with FS), im just saying that its difficult in a case when the only witnesses for the most part end up being so close to one defendant, it can end up painting a picture in our mind that might not be totally reliable.
I'd have liked to hear from the dad, how much interaction did he have with Star, how did FS seem to cope etc initially. Idk just some people that might be slightly more neutral or give balance to the evidence heard by presenting a different side.
I think the point of involving so many of FS’s family is that this was primarily about what happened to Star. And they had more insight into her day to day life than anyone else.
The staff in the pub wouldn’t be able to recall anything of much significance because at the time they wouldn’t have thought it was important to note what SB and FS were doing.
I did also pick up on what you noticed though About all of them seeming to remember things differently.
God knows why anyone thinks that being made to face the wall is an appropriate punishment for any child.I remember in infant school, if we misbehaved (usually silly little things) we were made to stand and face the brick wall at break time, sometimes for the whole 15 minutes and this was children aged 4-7… (this was in the early 00s, so 2000-2003).
I don’t think they do it now (or at least not at any schools I’ve seen) which I’m glad about, even at 4 I thought it was a horrible punishment. I can’t even imagine why you’d think of doing that to a baby. They just wouldn’t understand.