Didn't the hair dresser friend suggest it as she herself had been accused of hurting her kids and that's what she did, install CCTV?As far as I recall Tustin wanted the CCTV so she could monitor Arthur's movements.
Didn't the hair dresser friend suggest it as she herself had been accused of hurting her kids and that's what she did, install CCTV?As far as I recall Tustin wanted the CCTV so she could monitor Arthur's movements.
this is also the same person who was attacking various members on this thread on their feelings and emotions. I’m not sure how to mute people as I’m new but I’m going to figure it out and mute this personI don’t know how you see things in such black and white terms, I truly believe that she has low intelligence and crippling self esteem, it is seen often that a dubious character comes onto the scene and causes utter mayhem. She has sat in court trying her best with what she’s got to support her daughter, or I hope so anyway. But it’s only my opinion!
I’ve followed Arthur’s case to.Hi all, I know this thread is for Star but I also follow the Arthur case. This afternoon the Birmingham Mail have released CCTV footage of Arthur waking up on the morning of his death. I implore you all to NOT watch it, it’s harrowing and once it’s been seen, I fear it will haunt you. I’m a fully grown, reasonably hard nosed man and was in floods of tears.
I’m going to message Birmingham mail and ask them to remove it to let the little bloody warrior be remembered with some dignity.
I like your theory. It sounds plausible. It would also explain why FS was sat on SB’s knee comforting her in the hospital after they learned Star had passed away. At that point FS thought it was an accident - she assumed Star had fallen off the chair and winded / severely injured herself.Who was it that said about SB punching Star while Star was stood on a chair or something. I think that might be right. SB says about falling, FS also said something about falling. My current theory is this:
F goes to the toilet, SB punches Star while she’s stood on chair/sofa, SB didn’t think (after the previous attack) that the injuries would be any worse, SB already let slip it was only one blow which she couldn’t have known if she was out of the room, assumes Star is winded, tells F Star fell from a chair and is winded, which is why F doesn’t react quite so urgently because it’s “just another fall”.
In the immediate aftermath, F believes SBs account and tells Yvonne and is later intimidated by SB and her family, resulting in the change in story to everyone after 9pm on 22nd Sept.
Tustin was “trying to prove her innocence”.
The boyfriend of the hairdresser said they "didn't want to get involved in other parents discipline". Seriously!I can’t get my head around - Arthur could barely walk in the video, he’s shuffling about, how did the hairdresser or her boyfriend not think something was seriously wrong. So tragic.
I also thinking read the Arthur case really shows what the causing and allowing the death of a child is for. Absolutely awful behaviour on both parts.
They did this something was seriously wrong. They explained how ill he looked. They detailed the abuse he sustained in their house both physical and verbal. They saw he was being deprived of food and water and the partner sneaked him a glass of water he was too weak to hold to his mouth. After watching that video you can see just how weak he was. He was in absolute agony already slowly dying. ET just finished him off with the final blow that day. And they did NOTHING. How can you see him like that and not act. Not have the urge as an adult to protect that very obviously abused child. They should be held accountable. Be made an example of. It might make people think twice about turning a blind eye to child abuse if they thought criminal charges could be made against them.I can’t get my head around - Arthur could barely walk in the video, he’s shuffling about, how did the hairdresser or her boyfriend not think something was seriously wrong. So tragic.
I also thinking read the Arthur case really shows what the causing and allowing the death of a child is for. Absolutely awful behaviour on both parts.
Click on the poster’s name and in the box that comes up there should be an ‘ignore’ button.this is also the same person who was attacking various members on this thread on their feelings and emotions. I’m not sure how to mute people as I’m new but I’m going to figure it out and mute this person
Different case of child abuse/murder also in the courts. Arthur Hughes, poor little man.I'm getting confused who is Arthur??
Arthur Labinjo-Hughes. Another child abuse case who’s perpetrators are also currently facing trial for his murder. There is a separate thread on it with more information. It’s sort of derailing now.I'm getting confused who is Arthur??
Bit harsh … this thread is moving fast so it’s easy for people to get confused. Should there be a separate thread for the Arthur case?Why even comment on the post if you don’t know what it’s about.
I’m not sure. Arthur’s is hard to follow. So only reads bits here and thereDoes anyone know why there was so much CCTV inside Arthur’s home? I haven’t been able to follow the case in any detail due to focusing on the Star trial. Not sure I could cope reading about both at the same time but I keep wondering how they had so much CCTV that showed their cruelty.
One thing we can draw from both these horrific cases, thank goodness for modern technology, especially CCTV. Plus texts, phone photos, and videos in Star’s case. How difficult would it have been to prove guilt in these cases years ago without CCTV and suchlike?
If you Google 'shock', 'shock in a child' etc etc...the outcome doesn't look good. I can imagine that any mother seeing that would panic.I like your theory. It sounds plausible. It would also explain why FS was sat on SB’s knee comforting her in the hospital after they learned Star had passed away. At that point FS thought it was an accident - she assumed Star had fallen off the chair and winded / severely injured herself.
What do you think caused SB to attack Star that day? Someone, it may have been you, suggested that SB was violently punished Star because she took a toy or crisps off one of the other children (since SB had tended to always blame and punish Star in previous squabbles with other kids).
Also, if FS did think it was an accident caused by a fall, what WAS going on during those 11 minutes between googling shock and ringing the ambulance? Why did FS shout ‘Get the bleeping police!’? Why did someone first dial / text 999 and then hang up because it was the Police? These are the bits that I cannot fathom. Can anyone else?
Err…to find out what it is about?Why even comment on the post if you don’t know what it’s about.
Because this thread is about Star Hobson not Arthur, they were simply asking who that was, that is all. Don’t be so rude, especially in a thread discussing the abuse and death of a child.Why even comment on the post if you don’t know what it’s about.
There already is, so if people could go to the Arthur thread to discuss him that would be great. This is Star’s thread.Bit harsh … this thread is moving fast so it’s easy for people to get confused. Should there be a separate thread for the Arthur case?