Kinney
Well-known member
Good. No one needs to see that.Just seen on Ch4 news that the police have confirmed they will not release the rest of the recycling plant footage as it's too upsetting.
Good. No one needs to see that.Just seen on Ch4 news that the police have confirmed they will not release the rest of the recycling plant footage as it's too upsetting.
I think the image of Star's bruised face has changed their minds now.It’s frustrating for those that few FS shouldn’t have been found guilty of causing/ allowing but I have to say it’s frustrating that anyone who feels this simply believes that if only the rest of us were more empathetic we’d agree with you. Empathise with all that has been said about her across all threads, agree in large part, still think she is guilty and deserves significant sentence.
It reminded me SO much of Emma Tustin on that police bodycam. Calmly getting her side of the story in, no hysteria at all.It does sound like she’s creating a version of events. The way she just rambled on there was no sense of urgency, she’s barely even told them what was wrong with Star before she started the story of “how” it happened.
The operator asked if she was conscious and breathing and she practically said “yeah kinda but anyway, this is what happened”![]()
I think the user was mistaken and it was an old rant post of MK’s.Where’s her statement?
you mean “No you CUNT”NOYOU
CAN’T
![]()
I’d be surprised if she suddenly admits it and comes with a mitigation argument of “yes I did it but I didn’t mean to kill her”. But that’s basically all she’s got. Curious about the nod when the verdict was read out. Was it an accepting nod or a sarcastic “of course you’ve found me guilty, in a gypsy lesbian, you’re all racist homophobics” nod.That's interesting, thank you for posting. I'm still a bit confused regarding " if SB refuses to accept that she’s guilty." Isn't that exactly what she will do but now the jury have decided she is her protests mean nothing, could it actually help her sentence if she now admits or would that make it longer? Sorry to drag this out, I'm just interested in the process
I think this is one area where we will never agree. I’ll just say that FS did cancel visits from SS on a number of occasions, it was reported in court, not just the housing association guy. The only time Star was seen by a doctor was when the police took her to hospital. This baby seems to have been born unlucky, if that’s the right word. Even on that single occasion she was seen, it was by a junior doctor with 4 months experience rather than someone more experienced who may have rung alarm bells.She was already scared of SS from when Star was newborn, so I don’t buy that necessarily, no. The visits were the housing officer werent they? And fat lot of good they did anyway. And she said she wanted to take Star to hospital for her leg. Would she have said that if she knew the extent of Star’s injuries?
I just think if she really knew, there would be more messages about it, and those later texts of “she can’t be left to throw herself” (which she wasn’t doing) and “The marks on this baby is ridiculous, what's happened to her foot? I'm not blaming you by the way, I'm just asking x" wouldn’t make any sense. I don’t dispute she has hugely failed Star. The evidence just doesn’t stack up.
She referred to her in present tense during her evidence didn't she and people called it out as playing games. She just hasn't grieved it all has she I don't think.God that’s so upsetting. She hasn’t processed it at all has she.
She was already scared of SS from when Star was newborn, so I don’t buy that necessarily, no. The visits were the housing officer werent they? And fat lot of good they did anyway. And she said she wanted to take Star to hospital for her leg. Would she have said that if she knew the extent of Star’s injuries?Perhaps, but the way I see it is that FS cancelled visits from SS because she didn’t want them to see the bruises, she admitted she was worried they would take Star. Now, if a parent knows bruises are innocent would they be worried? Probably not. This begs the question whether she really didn’t understand that such severe bruising (and I believe the most harrowing ones have not even been released) does not just happen from accidents. Star’s face is covered in bruises in that video, even her ears are green. If she didn’t cause these bruises herself then surely you’d think where are they from? Also, I believe SS only saw Star a couple of times, the visits when Star had the most severe bruising were either not scheduled or postponed.
This is the absolute crux of the matter. There may be shortcomings with SS, with other family members, with friends or whatever, but ultimately there is only one murderer and she is to blame.In reality they are massively underfunded and underreaourced.
There used to be services you could refer families to which would have offered support but it's all gone.
Instead you've got a social worker with fuck all support, no resources and expected to detect everything. That social worker will also have a massive caseload
It's not a job I'd ever consider doing because they are damned whatever they do or don't do.
Blame needs to lie where it belongs....with the killer .
Sounds like some things were done, on at least one occasion Star was taken to hospital and examined by a doctor, that was at the behest of police and social services. Without a crystal ball they couldn't predict what SB would do.