Can this please not turn into a police bashing thread.
You don't always need forensic evidence if the circumstantial case is compelling. It usually takes longer to charge without direct forensic evidence though.Ive been watching the tv programme on BBC 2 about forensics and it gives you an insight to the investigative process. To be able to charge him means overwhelming forensic evidence or a confession. Either way its an horrific outcome.
The police do a fantastic job under the very difficult circumstances.Can this please not turn into a police bashing thread.
Yeah, I am sure there are ways of passing the tests and presenting as 'normal.' That is really scary. I have a feeling that a lot more is going to come out about this guy; gut instinct tells me that this was not his first crime.If the interviews and checks are designed and carried out by men would the red flags show? Edit - I know there’s more to this but we have to remember for years our whole society has been built by men and for men.
As someone else said, they do not indicate future behaviour either, someone can change overnight and if they really wanted could “act” or behave in a certain way to pass the tests?
I agree, there was a thread on here a couple of months back called what is something you’ve never shared with anyone or something like that and the number of stories people posted on their regarding being sexually assaulted by men was so shocking and upsetting to readMost women I know have had experiences where they have been made to feel uncomfortable by men in some way. From something relatively small to almost being grape, to actually being grape. It’s really shocking when you sit and think about it. How can it be a minority of men when the majority of women have experienced this? Again I’m not saying all men, but it has to be more than a minority.
It’s time we stopped telling women how to behave and started telling men instead. Teach boys about boundaries and consent instead of brushing bad behaviour off as “boys being boys” because that’s where it starts imo. Society as a whole needs to start condemning behaviours that often get laughed or brushed off. Sorry going off on a bit of a tangent here but I’m so angry for Sarah and her family. How many years have women had to put up with this bull? How many lives lost before something more is done? Enough is enough.
I don’t think I’ll ever trust a male police officer after this.
I don't know her name :-/Just search her name. You’ll recognise the pic.
I wasn't having a go at you or wanting you to apologise - I was actually trying to be nice about it!Alright I'm sorry, I didn't mean to forget and miss that part out in my other post.
Personally, I wouldn't consider 12 weeks lengthy training at all when you consider how long lawyers go to school for to learn the laws police officers are meant to be upholding
I honestly don't think it's a case of him slipping through the cracks. The vetting procedures are extremely stringent. If he had no previous, no links to anyone with a criminal record and nothing that stood out financially or on his medical records, then there would literally have been nothing to flag him up as unsuitable.It is really scary that he passed through all the checks for his job. However, I do wonder if a lot of these checks are carried out to their full effect - or if sometimes they are merely box ticking exercises. I am just speculating now, of course. I find it astounding that this guy somehow slipped through the cracks.
Sorry! Just a bit shook up with this whole caseI wasn't having a go at you - I was trying to be nice about it!
Similar to how a lot of women would feel safer seeing a female doctorI still have respect for the police, no doubt this guy is a bad apple amongst a bunch of good ones, but I can’t help feeling like I’d feel more comfortable talking to a female officer over a male. I’ve seen men in positions of power/trust use their position to abuse women too many times. It’s just how I feel.