Just scrolled back through her old pics, she looks SO much happier a few years back, I saw genuine smiles, haven’t seen a real smile from Sarah for a long time... it must be a horrible feeling knowing you are responsible for ruining your own career and reputation.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Me too will look forward to reading once I’ve dropped mine offI'm just getting my children ready for school, but I'll come on a bit later this morning and blow a few holes in this Bullshit Back Story™
I was working on the dance music media industry at precisely this time, this is a huge misrepresentation (surprised?!?) so let's get a few truths out about this..... Give me a couple of hours
So has Dad bod Jason got nothing better to do with his time? No wonder Sarah shagged LD as vile as he is because Jason & his I have no judgement is about as appealing as a house brick through a window. Can anyone remember his very convenient saving face tactic of I judge no one mantra after the proverbial tit hit the fan? Why he isnt busy cleaning up the mess is beyond me.
Sarah’s spirit guide must be eye rolling so hard...
I have had years of psychic/intuitive development training from qualified professionals (15yrs now? Also aware some aren’t into woo woo. I hear that, and this is why I keep it quiet).
I see it as self work? it’s an area of interest for me rather than a business to make money from. I see it as a way of connecting to self. It’s helped me in my other business roles (using my intuition).
SA is someone who is disconnected from self, a futurist (nothing wrong with that) however she’s clearly unable to live in the present and unpack the past.
that type of person suits funky interiors and cooking stuff.... not telling people your newly discovered high vibe perspective when it comes to business or life decisions.
She’s a very young soul. Much to learn.
Need to see this
Last edited:
I listen to Jason last night and what struck me is how adolescent and inarticulate he is , like Sarah they think they are super smart and radical , but in essence they are kids playing at being grown ups , he was try to say men areteam players and women are just witches to each other , but his poor summaries just left you confused and a bit embarrassed for him , hardly informed comments about feminism ! 
I agree and the fact he only chose to share opinions which reinforced his ideas.I listen to Jason last night and what struck me is how adolescent and inarticulate he is , like Sarah they think they are super smart and radical , but in essence they are kids playing at being grown ups , he was try to say men areteam players and women are just witches to each other , but his poor summaries just left you confused and a bit embarrassed for him , hardly informed comments about feminism !
The irony of it all - the fact he questions how females are pressured to look a certain way, while Sarah is hip thrusting and doing make up tutorials.
On a separate note I come from a Roma lineage where Tarot is taught from your elders. Seriously embarrassed for the advert she’s put up. Wait til others in the community get a whiff- she’ll be a laughing stock!
They just like the sound of their own voice tbh. No other viable reason for articulating what should’ve been a minute’s worth of words into 15 minutes.
This is also what happens when you have little workplace/real-world experience. You learn how to talk in a way that makes people want to listen to you... not switch off and fall asleep after two minutes.
This is also what happens when you have little workplace/real-world experience. You learn how to talk in a way that makes people want to listen to you... not switch off and fall asleep after two minutes.
Sarah Sarah Sarah, where do we start with this....?
Let's jump in a little time capsule back to 2007/2008. The dance music industry was going through seismic change as digital formats came to the fore and vinyl single sales (the dance industry's staple) fell off a cliff. Coupled with illegal downloading, all of a sudden, the money had dried up for labels and they urgently needed to monetise.
At the same time, club culture was pivoting from weekly/monthly nights to festivals - and this combined with low (zero) cost of releasing huge volumes of music from new artists presented the opportunity to claw back the lost record sales money.
Every week saw a new specialist download store open - including mixmag's own. Mixmag itself was owned at the time by Development Hell, who were part of The Guardian.
Low cost of production (by this point you didn't need a studio to be a producer, it was easy to do it all on a laptop, so Sarah's "I made the track in the bedroom" is far from exceptional - it was standard) meant that labels no longer had to carry risk in releasing music - no pressing vinyl, label artwork etc. Advances became a thing of the past, and festival organisers cottoned on to the idea of record labels and magazines like mixmag hosting arenas.
The labels therefore signed anyone and everyone, knowing a couple would make it (bear in mind the labels were typically offshoots of big labels like Sony, Polydor etc etc but kept "indy" for credibility) but the rest would be the unpaid support acts in these festival arenas to fill a lineup. Sarah Akwisombe even refers to a festival gig of 4 drunk Scottish men. Case in point. She was a filler act. Some in the industry cruelly called it "the sausage factory" - tit meat went in, a couple of bangers came out.
Why the mixmag cover? It was STANDARD that if a record label (in this instance XL Recordings / Locked On) took out a load of ads, they'd be rewarded with a cover slot for the artists in question - which in turn grew interest in the acts to drive MP3 sales in the magazine's own download store.....
Sarah / Goldielocks was just there at this moment in time, when strange deals were being done as an industry tried to adapt to a new digital world. She never got further, she wasn't on the cover out of editorial interest, she was a backfill artist from the label to bulk out the cover shot and have another girl there with Little Boots, as part of a standard commercial deal.
Sorry - a long post with a lot of incidental but important info there!
In short - she was on the cover because it was paid for. Not talent or anything else.
Let's jump in a little time capsule back to 2007/2008. The dance music industry was going through seismic change as digital formats came to the fore and vinyl single sales (the dance industry's staple) fell off a cliff. Coupled with illegal downloading, all of a sudden, the money had dried up for labels and they urgently needed to monetise.
At the same time, club culture was pivoting from weekly/monthly nights to festivals - and this combined with low (zero) cost of releasing huge volumes of music from new artists presented the opportunity to claw back the lost record sales money.
Every week saw a new specialist download store open - including mixmag's own. Mixmag itself was owned at the time by Development Hell, who were part of The Guardian.
Low cost of production (by this point you didn't need a studio to be a producer, it was easy to do it all on a laptop, so Sarah's "I made the track in the bedroom" is far from exceptional - it was standard) meant that labels no longer had to carry risk in releasing music - no pressing vinyl, label artwork etc. Advances became a thing of the past, and festival organisers cottoned on to the idea of record labels and magazines like mixmag hosting arenas.
The labels therefore signed anyone and everyone, knowing a couple would make it (bear in mind the labels were typically offshoots of big labels like Sony, Polydor etc etc but kept "indy" for credibility) but the rest would be the unpaid support acts in these festival arenas to fill a lineup. Sarah Akwisombe even refers to a festival gig of 4 drunk Scottish men. Case in point. She was a filler act. Some in the industry cruelly called it "the sausage factory" - tit meat went in, a couple of bangers came out.
Why the mixmag cover? It was STANDARD that if a record label (in this instance XL Recordings / Locked On) took out a load of ads, they'd be rewarded with a cover slot for the artists in question - which in turn grew interest in the acts to drive MP3 sales in the magazine's own download store.....
Sarah / Goldielocks was just there at this moment in time, when strange deals were being done as an industry tried to adapt to a new digital world. She never got further, she wasn't on the cover out of editorial interest, she was a backfill artist from the label to bulk out the cover shot and have another girl there with Little Boots, as part of a standard commercial deal.
Sorry - a long post with a lot of incidental but important info there!
In short - she was on the cover because it was paid for. Not talent or anything else.
The operative word I noticed was ‘ I’m sweet’ not my family is sweet or my life in general just ‘I’
Like someone said upthread a young / immature soul she needs to learn some resilience and get some life experience and understand you don’t need to be top dog at everything .
I just don’t get how deluded you gotta be to chat so much tit online, in this day and age, knowing that there always will be someone who can call out your bullshit. Obviously if she was always telling the truth, she wouldn’t have to worry about that
Not to mention her music was tit. witch had no credibility in the music scene, just a YT girl wannabe, all image no substance.
I think she seriously believes her own hype, I guess you would if that’s all you’ve listened to while you blindly tried to see what stuck over and over again for 35 years
I can’t imagine she listens to feedback from anyone, that’s probably why she doesn’t have many mates
I was actually going to say that she comes across as Billy no mates, maybe that’s why she was trying to befriend her clients and be cool with them like friends and not like a (crappy) service provider
Yep - little girl lost. Desperate to belong somewhere and even more desperate to be liked.
Rather than stick at something and get really good at it, she jumps from one to the next if she gets a glimmer of recognition for it.
I'm guessing the 10,000 Hours concept is well and truly lost on her!
OMG have just heard from ‘my source’ that she did Page 3 before trying to be a pop star.
Very true - there are no friends in business!
She uses the 'mate' approach to sucker people in to buying more from her, it's all "babe" this, and "hun" that - it's all a facade to lure people in to thinking she's their friend so they trust her and purchase more from her. Classic MLM.
@Thetruthwillout really interesting stuff , I suspected that was the case . What happened to little boots too she disappeared also .
Lots of them were flash in the pan, it was the start of a new "disposable artist" era. Quite a few artists of that era were pretty smart and viewed it as a "way in" to build contacts and now are in management positions at places like Spotify etc, exec producers for big mainstream artists, or producing TV and film music. But someone like Sarah Akwisombe wouldn't be smart enough to see it was part of a career path that you have to work hard at for a long time before success. There's so many good ones like that, but we're talking about over a decade of work, development, learning and mastering their craft before success, and as we know, the one thing SA doesn't have is commitment. She wants it all now, and misguidedly thinks she's entitled to it too.
yeah she mentioned her glamour model attempt on one of her blog posts about how many jobs she had to fail at in order to become amazing. I kept wanting to add that to posts about her career history but was always pages late ha ha
- Status