of course, the FF's are the most active viewers who don't care about the scandalsThumbnail for the friendliest friends tonight. Got to keep everyone happy
of course, the FF's are the most active viewers who don't care about the scandalsThumbnail for the friendliest friends tonight. Got to keep everyone happy
They are the biggest scandal.of course, the FF's are the most active viewers who don't care about the scandals
He had poor little Alessia's bits out on the vlog before so anything goes with him. He's had Anna's bits out too on Instagram , he's sick.Oh for the love of all that is holy. How can you put a picture of your child in just a towel not just on your private social media which just your family can see but on a platform where any Tom, Dick or pweirdo can access it? He truly sickens me and the fact that Anna is complicit just makes it worse
Gotta keep his core audience happy.....He had poor little Alessia's bits out on the vlog before so anything goes with him. He's had Anna's bits out too on Instagram , he's sick.
He has been told for years and still does it. It's a choice.This comment on the vlog! glad someone noticed!
View attachment 118044
While I agree alot of the latest conversation has been purely speculation I don't think it's fair to make a blanket statement suggesting most comments on the thread are assumptions. Also even with some of the comments that could be classified as assuming something lots of those assumptions are based off 8 yrs of seeing these ppls daily life. If we've never once seen Anna playing a board game with her kids in 8 yrs it's a fair assumption that she probably doesn't play games at all or very often with her kids. We watched Anna for over a yr never once take Emilia to or from ballet. Sure there was lots of speculation she never did and we could've been wrong until she proved our assumption to be true by admitting the first time she took Emilia over a yr later she didn't even know where it was because she'd never been there. Some of the things they don't share or don't share can lead you to a logical assumption.lots of comments made in this treat are purely based on assumptions with no actual proof, we dont actually know what they do off camera if they give them milk, eat more veggies, spend more time with then, spend more time with doggies , out of sight out of mind none of us know but since we dont agree with them putting their kids online before they could ever chose to do so for money so they can live like king and queen when the kids are target for creepy people and work for the family income anything is judging material
No of course we don't but there's proof a nanny is there at the moment and we know enough about their lives from what they choose to put in public to know that is a possibility it could be them. They have a nanny for when the other 3 are in school and just Andrea home even though the two parents are home mostly 24/7. And their job is vlogging their lives, mostly the 4 little money earners. They can't cope with their 4 planned kids at the best of times but want their audience to believe they are suffering so much during lockdown having to look after their own children with 2 parents at home, when all along they have a nanny there.Can I point out we have no proof she's the nanny they are referring to, while it sounds like something they would do don't accuse without proof
most normal fathers wouldnt vlog their kids for a living quite the contraryPoor Emilia. He mustn't have any paternal instincts whatsoever. Normal, decent fathers would want to shield their children from creeps, whilst he serves his children to them on a plate. Disgusting.