They’re not renting that house, it was on rightmove SSTC and came off the day they moved which is what happens when a sale completes. Some have speculated that mama beaver bought it and they’re renting it from her which may be true, but I think a lot of people are underestimating how much equity they will have had in the shack, especially if it sold for near the asking price. I think that’s why they’ve been able to buy a house for nearly half a million £ but still don’t have much to spend day to day. For example, me and my husband have got a lot of equity in our property because we bought it dirt cheap, renovated it fully and now house prices have shot up too. So technically, we can afford to buy a property for up to £450,000 with small enough monthly payments that our two average incomes can cover. Still doesn’t mean we’d be able to flaunt the cash, shop at M&S/waitrose and buy luxury designer clothes. I’m not defending them or sticking up for them
![Face with tears of joy :joy: 😂](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f602.png)
![Face with tears of joy :joy: 😂](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f602.png)
but just saying a lot have said they can’t understand the difference between the house price and their spending habits, but it is possible that they’ve done it by themselves without input from his family. We’ll find it all out in a few weeks anyway when the info becomes public.
Obviously the sensible thing to do would be to have bought a property for around £300,000 and bought a smaller/less expensive car. They then could have invested some of the spare change for their future and extra money as a result from smaller monthly payments could have been put towards their kids - better quality clothes and shoes, money towards hobbies and interests etc. but these two are so selfish they only care about how
they look to others - 5 bed detached house with a jag and personalised number plate on the drive. They’re pathetic and they have their priorities all wrong.